Now
Fair
54°
High
86°
Low
63°

Solid revenue growth predicted for state

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Feb 24, 2007 - 05:42:50 pm CST

The state’s forecasting board made it official:  There will be plenty of state tax revenue for the governor’s meat and potatoes budget plan and his rich dessert of tax cuts.

The advisory board on Friday predicted the state will bring in about $7.054 billion during the next two-year budget cycle, or about $53 million more than previous forecasts.

That’s $53 million more senators can spend on state agencies like the University of Nebraska. Or it’s $53 million more they can send back to Nebraskans as tax cuts.

Here are some details from the February forecast:

* It raises the current year forecasts by $30 million. That money will automatically go into the cash reserve (rainy day) fund when the fiscal year ends June 30, bringing the reserve fund to $526 million. Under that forecast, net state tax revenues would be 5.3 percent above last year’s revenue.

* It raises forecasts for the next two fiscal years by $27 million and $26 million. Net state tax revenue would rise 3.9 percent next fiscal year and 5.1 percent the second fiscal year under this forecast.

Gov. Dave Heineman offered some simple advice:  Don’t spend it.

“The actions taken today by the forecasting board show the continued strength of state receipts. However, they should not be viewed as a call for additional spending,” said in his e-mail response to the Friday forecast.

 This mid-session forecast is an important number for legislators.

The Appropriations Committee will use it as members make budget recommendations. And the Revenue Committee has been waiting for the forecast number before sorting through tax-cut proposals.

“Our job probably gets tougher after today’s news,” said Appropriations Committee Chairman Lavon Heidemann of Elk Creek. The higher forecast puts pressure on the committee to give more money to state agencies, he said. “It will be tougher to be prudent.”

The committee agreed to hold spending growth to 4.2 percent in its initial budget plan that will be used in public hearings over the next month.  The committee already decided on a low-growth budget even though there appeared to be plenty of revenue, Heidemann pointed out.

The Appropriations and Revenue committees will work together to determine how much money might be available for tax cuts, he said.

Now that they have a new forecast, Revenue Committee members will begin sorting through almost two dozen tax-cut plans, including the governor’s proposal to cut taxes for middle- and lower-income Nebraskans this year and income taxes for the wealthy over the following three years.

Other plans include several methods for reducing property taxes and a one-half cent cut in the state sales tax. The total cost for all the proposals is about $1.4 billion during the second year of the two-year budget, far more than has been estimated will be available. Senators expect they may have about $200 million each year for tax cuts or additional spending.

“It’s getting to be crunch time,” said Revenue Committee Chairman Ray Janssen of Nickerson, referring to the work ahead.

The February forecast, slightly higher than the October prediction, reflects the board’s belief that current solid economic growth will continue over the next two and a half years.

The nine appointed board members — citizens with backgrounds in business or economics — use information from national economic models, advice from the Department of Revenue and the Legislature’s fiscal office and their own experiences to make their best guesses.

Members pointed to the $4-a-bushel price for corn as a positive sign and the oversupply of new homes in the Omaha area as a concern for the future.

The forecasting board will meet again April 24 to make a final forecast that will be used as the Legislature and governor make final tax cut and spending decisions this spring.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Sean wrote on February 23, 2007 7:32 pm:
" Great news! Now lower our taxes and give us our money back! "

annie wrote on February 23, 2007 8:34 pm:
" I noticed it said revenue from income tax as the leader. Why does it always have to be a tax from citizens that make an overage. How come we don't see tax on tourist or something like that. Is it because no one comes to our fine state for vacation? Thanks a lot. "

Employee wrote on February 24, 2007 12:17 am:
" Any bets on whether the State will actually come to a decent deal on State Employee pay, then? We were told that the state couldn't afford it... Oh, Heck. I'd forgo any raises if it meant I didn't pay state income tax... "

Cole wrote on February 24, 2007 8:09 am:
" Sean, it's not your money! The rest of us levied taxes on ourselves and you to pay for roads, police, fire departments and schools. You earned your money from your own hard work, but the reason you have a job is because of the benefits of national and local security, public eduction and paved roads to get you there. You have the second lowest per-capita taxes in the industrialized world. If there's a surplus, the state should put it in reserve or restore all of the social programs and UNL departments that have been cut or slashed because of earlier budget shortfalls. How long did that stupid $600 check from Bush last four years ago? Now the federal govt. is servicing trillions of dollars of debt. You'll rarely find anyone to disagree with lowering taxes, but it would be nice if once in a while those people would look past their own front doors. Older Nebraskans fleeing the state because of taxes should remember how much they benefited from the taxes of others while growing up and living here. The $75,000 spent on putting each one of your children through public school didn't all come out of your pocket. The rest of us chipped in because we're all better off having literate kids walking around. "

mike wrote on February 24, 2007 9:34 am:
" Annie - a tax on tourist would be part of the sales tax, lodging tax, etc. There's no such thing as a tourist tax so that's why you don't see it listed. "

Bill wrote on February 24, 2007 11:03 am:
" Ha ha ha ha ha!! Thats the funniest joke I've heard in my Nebraska life!! Will of course the income rises when the citizens are taxed and taxed to death. You can bet the legislators will find ways to spend every dime of it. They will probably give themselves a big raise when they already make more than the legislators in my former state that has alot more to legistate than Nebraska. Which is why my former states state & property taxes are half Nebraskas. "

Canadian wrote on February 24, 2007 4:57 pm:
" Cole, it's sounds like you would LOVE Canada. You can spend lots of your income there pitching in for all the social (welfare) programs you want. "

Hope wrote on February 24, 2007 7:11 pm:
" You watch these new senators. I am hearing they don't plan on spending this money and want to hold spending down to statory requirements (at least the newbies I've heard on Appropriations Committee). I have hope they will do as they said they would do. Otherwise, there will be better options for elected leaders out there. "