Cook calls for evaluation of Time Warner Cable
By JEFF KORBELIK / Lincoln Journal Star
Lincoln City Councilman Jonathan Cook is introducing a resolution today calling for a performance evaluation of and a legal investigation into Time Warner Cable’s new Navigator program guide and DVR software.
“There are serious problems here,” Cook said Wednesday afternoon. “I think Lincoln customers deserve better. They are not getting what they have paid for.”
A public hearing on the resolution is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. March 5.
Time Warner asked Cook to wait a week before introducing his resolution to see if its latest software upgrade, scheduled to be finished by Friday, takes care of the problems, said Ann Shrewsbury, director of public affairs for the cable company’s Nebraska division.
“This is a top priority for this division and our company,” Shrewsbury said. “It’s very important for us to make the changes needed to create a great product that will have incredible opportunities in the future.”
According to Cook, the city’s franchise agreement with Time Warner, approved in November 2005, gives the city the authority to order a performance evaluation.
Cook’s resolution calls for the Cable Television Advisory Board to conduct the evaluation. It also calls for city attorneys to review any franchise agreement violations, Federal Communications Commission violations or other regulatory infractions.
Last fall, Time Warner dropped the contracted Passport channel guide in favor of the company-created Navigator.
Time Warner changed the guide to make it compatible with other software programs coming down the line, such as TV caller ID for those who have the company’s phone and digital cable service.
The change affected 46,000 digital cable subscribers. Time Warner has 110,000 television subscribers in Southeast Nebraska.
Time Warner is the nation’s second largest cable company with more than 18 million subscribers. The Nebraska division was the first to introduce Navigator to its customers.
The new guide has been beset with problems since its introduction. Complaints have ranged from the guide itself — ugly graphics, incomplete information, etc. — to problems with slow-reacting cable boxes and DVRs after the software was loaded into them, causing some subscribers to reboot one or more times a day.
Cook said he is a Time Warner subscriber and DVR user. As the council’s liaison to the Cable Television Advisory Board, he said he received his upgrade with Time Warner employees before it was introduced to the public.
“I didn’t think it was ready,” he said. “I thought it needed more work before it was released.”
Shrewsbury said Time Warner will comply with an evaluation. She also said the company has kept city officials abreast of the situation.
“The timing of this is unfortunate because we believe this latest (upgrade) will solve the most important issues affecting customers,” she said.
Residents unable to attend the hearing can e-mail their comments to council@lincoln.ne.gov.
Reach Jeff Korbelik at 473-7213 or jkorbelik@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Brett Otte wrote on February 22, 2007 1:57 am:
roger wrote on February 22, 2007 2:07 am:
Daniel wrote on February 22, 2007 3:04 am:
BAP wrote on February 22, 2007 5:11 am:
Time Warner boo wrote on February 22, 2007 5:30 am:
Bill in Lincoln. wrote on February 22, 2007 6:35 am:
L.D. Hadfield wrote on February 22, 2007 6:49 am:
nitemare wrote on February 22, 2007 7:07 am:
it's about time wrote on February 22, 2007 7:23 am:
Time Warner Subscriber wrote on February 22, 2007 7:38 am:
Comm UnSense wrote on February 22, 2007 7:40 am:
This is cable wrote on February 22, 2007 7:53 am:
scott wrote on February 22, 2007 7:56 am:
Chris wrote on February 22, 2007 8:05 am:
Anonymous wrote on February 22, 2007 8:06 am:
J wrote on February 22, 2007 8:23 am:
SL wrote on February 22, 2007 8:29 am:
Sean wrote on February 22, 2007 8:30 am:
Mr. DVR wrote on February 22, 2007 8:32 am:
Unhappy wrote on February 22, 2007 8:34 am:
JT wrote on February 22, 2007 8:37 am:
Tina wrote on February 22, 2007 8:42 am:
Steve wrote on February 22, 2007 8:45 am:
Who are they kidding? wrote on February 22, 2007 8:46 am:
dave wrote on February 22, 2007 8:46 am:
Thank you! wrote on February 22, 2007 8:52 am:
Cook Skeptic wrote on February 22, 2007 9:04 am:
Jan wrote on February 22, 2007 9:10 am:
Economist wrote on February 22, 2007 9:13 am:
John R wrote on February 22, 2007 9:15 am:
bheer n ose wrote on February 22, 2007 9:18 am:
Bill wrote on February 22, 2007 9:21 am:
JS wrote on February 22, 2007 9:23 am:
I agree! wrote on February 22, 2007 9:24 am:
GMP wrote on February 22, 2007 9:25 am:
GP wrote on February 22, 2007 9:27 am:
You have no idea wrote on February 22, 2007 9:28 am:
Jim L. wrote on February 22, 2007 9:41 am:
Seriously Jon wrote on February 22, 2007 9:50 am:
Who has no idea? wrote on February 22, 2007 10:03 am:
do something wrote on February 22, 2007 10:09 am:
bill wrote on February 22, 2007 10:22 am:
JB wrote on February 22, 2007 10:41 am:
POLITICAL MOVE? wrote on February 22, 2007 10:42 am:
Me wrote on February 22, 2007 10:46 am:
Kevin wrote on February 22, 2007 10:47 am:
Ryan wrote on February 22, 2007 10:48 am:
Yippeee!! wrote on February 22, 2007 11:01 am:
Who cares wrote on February 22, 2007 11:09 am:
Daisy wrote on February 22, 2007 11:12 am:
Don wrote on February 22, 2007 11:30 am:
Irritated wrote on February 22, 2007 11:34 am:
LOVE DVR wrote on February 22, 2007 11:51 am:
Aisli wrote on February 22, 2007 12:23 pm:
ANSWER wrote on February 22, 2007 12:23 pm:
D-bonz wrote on February 22, 2007 12:50 pm:
JimDandy wrote on February 22, 2007 1:06 pm:
big D wrote on February 22, 2007 1:11 pm:
cguy wrote on February 22, 2007 1:12 pm:
Its horrible wrote on February 22, 2007 1:17 pm:
Joey M wrote on February 22, 2007 1:42 pm:
KDizzle wrote on February 22, 2007 2:14 pm:
jim wrote on February 22, 2007 2:22 pm:
About Time wrote on February 22, 2007 2:22 pm:
geez wrote on February 22, 2007 2:23 pm:
missing point wrote on February 22, 2007 2:27 pm:
Kellye wrote on February 22, 2007 2:43 pm:
Yes, but... wrote on February 22, 2007 2:43 pm:
I really love when... wrote on February 22, 2007 3:12 pm:
ME (FYI) wrote on February 22, 2007 3:26 pm:
cable advisory board wrote on February 22, 2007 3:58 pm:
tell me more about DISH wrote on February 22, 2007 4:12 pm:
Todd wrote on February 22, 2007 4:23 pm:
Al wrote on February 22, 2007 5:29 pm:
thanks wrote on February 22, 2007 5:31 pm:
Yep wrote on February 22, 2007 5:31 pm:
Help me understand wrote on February 22, 2007 6:41 pm:
Mark wrote on February 22, 2007 7:00 pm:
Kim and Kevin wrote on February 22, 2007 7:18 pm:
KCMO wrote on February 22, 2007 9:02 pm:
Just a thought wrote on February 22, 2007 9:16 pm:
choked wrote on February 22, 2007 10:55 pm:
Lower My Bill wrote on February 22, 2007 11:36 pm:
jr wrote on February 23, 2007 8:27 am:
Steve wrote on February 23, 2007 9:30 am:
Will not pay wrote on February 23, 2007 9:57 am:
JJ wrote on February 23, 2007 10:21 am:
Time Warner supporter wrote on February 23, 2007 10:22 am:
Dear Cox wrote on February 23, 2007 1:13 pm:
Whoever wrote... wrote on February 23, 2007 1:19 pm:
Horrible wrote on February 23, 2007 2:47 pm:
Whats the problem wrote on February 23, 2007 3:38 pm:
Cable User wrote on February 23, 2007 4:43 pm:
Tried Satellite wrote on February 23, 2007 4:53 pm:
Ed wrote on February 23, 2007 5:04 pm:
steve wrote on February 23, 2007 9:06 pm:
debbie wrote on February 23, 2007 9:55 pm:
Dean wrote on February 24, 2007 9:48 am:
Saturday Update wrote on February 24, 2007 2:37 pm:
Thankful wrote on February 24, 2007 3:25 pm:
spend spend spend wrote on February 24, 2007 6:50 pm:
TWM Customer wrote on February 24, 2007 7:01 pm:
Jeremy wrote on February 24, 2007 7:41 pm:
Jason wrote on February 25, 2007 4:37 am:
Alan wrote on February 25, 2007 8:15 am:
Jason K wrote on February 25, 2007 5:25 pm: