Now
Fair
61.0°
High
87°
Low
64°
Full Forecast

Coupon

Jobs

Cars

Homes

Rentals

Alerts

Subscribe
Home > News > Local
Bookmark Us   •   Make Us Your Homepage

Police pick up freshman senator suspected of DUI

Comments 196 comment(s)  
E-mail Story E-mail Story
Print Story Print Story
Share  Share
Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Feb 15, 2007 - 10:20:24 am CST

Lincoln police picked up a freshman senator on suspicion of drunken driving after she ran into a city snow plow early Wednesday.

Sen. Danielle Nantkes of Lincoln  was driving east on P Street in the south lane in her 1990 Dodge Spirit at 1 a.m. when she collided with a southbound Caterpillar front-end loader, according to Officer Katherine Finnell.

She said the snow plow had not quite cleared the intersection at 19th Street when Nantkes hit the right rear of it, causing $1,500 damage to her own car.

Story Photo
Danielle Nantkes

The snow plow driver, Timothy Brabb of Lincoln, called police.

Nantkes, 29, told the officer she tried to stop but couldn’t because of the snow, according to the accident report.

Finnell said the officer observed signs of impairment and said Nantkes smelled of alcohol, had slurred speech, noticeably impaired balance and bloodshot, watery eyes.

Nantkes allegedly refused to take field sobriety tests or a preliminary breath test at the scene and was taken to the police station, where she refused a chemical test, according to Finnell.

Police cited her on suspicion of negligent driving, misdemeanor driving under the influence and refusal of a preliminary breath test and chemical test.

Then they took her to Cornhusker Place detox center, which is often what police do when DUI suspects live in Lincoln, don’t have a record of failures to appear and are accused of misdemeanors, Finnell said.

By state law, police couldn’t arrest her. According to Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska State Constitution, state senators — except in cases of treason, felony allegations or a breach of the peace — are privileged from arrest during the session and 15 days before and after.

Voters in District 46 elected Nantkes, a lawyer with a nonprofit group that works on poverty issues, to the Legislature in November.

She issued a written statement apologizing for the accident Wednesday afternoon.

“I was involved in a property damage incident last night. Alcohol was a factor. No one was hurt,” Nantkes said. “I humbly apologize to my constituents, colleagues, friends and the public.”

She said she would get an alcohol evaluation and follow all recommendations.

“I intend to accept full responsibility for my actions,” Nantkes said.

Sen. Mike Flood, speaker of the Legislature, said it would be inappropriate for him to say what, if any, possible repercussions Nantkes could face in the Legislature, should she be convicted.

Nebraska doesn’t have an ethics committee, as some state legislatures do, to deal with allegations like this, he said.

Flood said he hadn’t talked yet with Nantkes and knew little about the accusations.

“We’ll let the law enforcement authorities and the court proceed as they would in any other situation similar to this,” he said.

Nantkes was set to go to court on the charges on March 26.

Finnell said Lincoln police have stopped Nantkes twice before on suspicion of drunken driving, both times in 1997.

After a stop on April 24, 1997, the then 19-year-old Nantkes was convicted of reckless driving and paid a $100 fine. After a stop on Aug. 22, 1997, she was convicted of DUI-first offense and ordered to serve one year on probation and pay a $200 fine.

Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

Post Your Comment

Standards and Rules
All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Hide Comments Hide Comments   Newest First Newest First  
TG wrote on February 14, 2007 5:23 pm:
" Umm.....oops! I feel really sorry for Senator Nantkes. She is such a wonderful person and surely a rising star in the legislature. I hope this doesn't ruin her career. "
WHAT? wrote on February 14, 2007 5:32 pm:
" "According to Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska State Constitution, state senators — except in cases of treason, felony allegations or a breach of the peace — are privileged from arrest during the session and 15 days before and after." Umm...what in the world? Privileged from arrest? Who came up with this BS? "
Concerned: wrote on February 14, 2007 5:35 pm:
" Just what we need, another good upstanding senator with potentially 2 DUI's. We dont need people like this leading in any branch of government. "
nitemare wrote on February 14, 2007 5:45 pm:
" Why should the law-makers be above the rest of us? This isn't right. They are subject to the same rules and penalties as the common man. "
Joe wrote on February 14, 2007 6:04 pm:
" Lots of waffling going on here. "
Resignation wrote on February 14, 2007 6:16 pm:
" Someone, who obviously has a problem with alcohol, should not be serving in the Legislature. It seems to me that Senator Mossey was forced to resign for the same thing. Senator Nantkes, please do the right thing and resign and take care of your problem. We need someone to represent us who can follow the law. "
Tom Issaquah wrote on February 14, 2007 6:16 pm:
" Oh Oh!!!Do we have a problem here? Once maybe, but this seems to be a chronic event!!! Catch this early and serve as an example of how to deal with making good decisions. "
Bob wrote on February 14, 2007 6:18 pm:
" “I was involved in a property damage incident last night. Alcohol was a factor. No one was hurt,” Nantkes said. “I humbly apologize to my constituents, colleagues, friends and the public.” “I intend to accept full responsibility for my actions,” Nantkes said. While I don't condone her actions it's very refreshing to see someone admit they did something wrong, apologize, and accept responsibility. Almost unheard of anymore. Particularly in polotics. "
airedale wrote on February 14, 2007 6:18 pm:
" This state definitely needs an ethics committee to oversee the actions of state officials while in office. "
TF wrote on February 14, 2007 6:24 pm:
" Hope this doesn't ruin her career? Ooops? She could have killed someone or ruined the lives of an entire family. Those who can't follow laws shouldn't be making the laws. I don't feel sorry for her at all. As a citizen in her district I feel I deserve better. "
Proud American wrote on February 14, 2007 6:33 pm:
" Well it doesn't surprise me that their is actually a Article III By state law, that Lincoln police couldn’t arrest her. According to Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska State Constitution, state senators — except in cases of treason, felony allegations or a breach of the peace — are privileged from arrest during the session and 15 days before and after, yes who wrote this BS' No one is above the Law. Now we can only hope she makes a few changes in her life too better herself, but hey what about all of you who attend the Big Red football games and tailgate parties all around town just getting shtfaced intoxicated, its a big celebration of drunks and then driving home blind and a potential hazard to anyone driving at that time.' Why do we allow this? "
She should be no different than us wrote on February 14, 2007 6:33 pm:
" Isn't refusal of the tests enough to lose your license? I don't know about ethics issues or arrest, but I hope she at least loses her license like the rest of us would if that is the case. "
JT wrote on February 14, 2007 6:35 pm:
" What's the problem with the eastern part of the state and it's Drunken State Senators? I also noticed Nantkes refused a Chemical test as well. "
former nebraskan... wrote on February 14, 2007 6:37 pm:
" so does that mean if she is out driving drunk tonight and she hits and kills someone does that mean she wont do any jail time cause she is a senator... whats good for the GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER NOW DONT YOU THINK.. bunch of b.s if you ask me "
Prior DUI? wrote on February 14, 2007 6:40 pm:
" Sounds like she is busy trying to ruin her own career to me. Just so she does not kill someone else in the process. "
The law wrote on February 14, 2007 6:41 pm:
" I think the law dates back many many years to prevent unscrupulous officials from having "friends" in law enforcement arresting senators to prevent them from voting on important matters. "
Larry wrote on February 14, 2007 6:51 pm:
" Everybody deserves a second chance, including Senator Nantkes. Other prominent politicians have had similar scrapes with the law and gotten second chances. George W. Bush was arrested for DUI back in 1976 at age 30. Moreover, Dick Cheney was convicted of DUI twice in the 1960s. If Bush & Cheney deserved another chance, then so does Senator Nantkes. "
Better be the same wrote on February 14, 2007 6:52 pm:
" Everyone on here should make sure and rip her a new one just like you did for the LPD officer! "
Dan wrote on February 14, 2007 6:53 pm:
" Here is an example of law makers creating different laws for different classes of people. I am unhappy becuase I am in the class of the hard working ordianry people that would have been arrested for a similar mistake. I have zero respect for Nantkes and she should not be in a leadership postition. I would have thought differently if she would have admiited her mistake and suffered the consequences. However, she is in that other class of society! "
Kate wrote on February 14, 2007 6:59 pm:
" It sure sounds to me like someone has a drinking problem?????? "
Bud wrote on February 14, 2007 7:01 pm:
" She will get off just like the judge in Lincoln a few months ago who hit a motorcycle rider! It's not the law when you don't administer it equally to all. "
Judge not... wrote on February 14, 2007 7:04 pm:
" She still has my vote. She was my neighbor in North Lincoln and my senator now. She truly is a wonderful young woman. I don't believe that "law makers are above the rest of us" but it is still THE LAW. Perhaps rather than judging the individual THE LAW itself should be judged and ratified and in this day and age an ethics committee is a necessity. "
Rick wrote on February 14, 2007 7:14 pm:
" well concerned why don't we just drag her out in to the street now and string her up, we need a good hanging. Right now you can walk on water (5 deg. out) but how about next may. "
D.A. wrote on February 14, 2007 7:23 pm:
" Say good bye to your political career. This will be dredged up every time she tries to run for anything or try to do anything meaningful. Hang it up...its over...the Governor should get on with it and appoint a new senator if she is convicted. "
Stand up and vote wrote on February 14, 2007 7:25 pm:
" If you don't like it then don't vote for her!! "
Hjalmer wrote on February 14, 2007 7:52 pm:
" Actually, it's no accident that it's hard to arrest a Senator when the legislature is in session. The Founding Fathers had experience with the King arresting political enemies in the legislative Branch to get them out of the way during important votes. "
tc wrote on February 14, 2007 8:01 pm:
" Sen. Nantkes is human, above all else, and this article clearly states that she was arrested and will face the same consequences as any other human. She, herself, has accepted full responsibility for her actions. Let's not be so quick to tar and feather her --- unless the rest of us are all perfect. "
double standard wrote on February 14, 2007 8:05 pm:
" If you fully intend to take responsibility then why refuse the test? Typical double speak when everyone else has to follow one rule but "not me" "
Appoint a new Senator wrote on February 14, 2007 8:06 pm:
" She should resign from her position as a senator and the Governor should replace her with Carol Brown. "
debbie wrote on February 14, 2007 8:07 pm:
" And she has a history of it to boot? If it would have been you or I, we would have been handcuffed and taken straight in for booking. What makes her so special? Judging by her record, not a whole lot. Drinking and driving is completely irresponsible and stupid, and she's supposed to be a leader? It won't be long before it's a person instead of a snow plow that she rams into. "
Nice Law wrote on February 14, 2007 8:11 pm:
" Is that a Senator Chambers law? Why in the world would they be exempt during session and 15 days before and after? That needs to be changed ASAP. "
Eric wrote on February 14, 2007 8:23 pm:
" Shouldn't a DUI (which endagers all of us on the road, or the sidewalk for that matter) come under breach of peace thus making her subject to arrest. Good God, this really is out of line. And by the way, shame on her for setting such a poor example. An apology is not good enough for me. "
privilege wrote on February 14, 2007 8:25 pm:
" She could have killed someone. It's a good thing she's "privileged from arrest." "
Good grief. wrote on February 14, 2007 8:27 pm:
" Well another child senator, and a drunken' one. Can't believe citizens that vote these "children" in to make law for a state and its people!!?? This doesn't happen in my former state. Little wonder why Nebraska is going down the drain. Boy at 29, we really know what the state history and world history are for judging and comparing. Can't even act like a responsible adult!!!!! "
lawman wrote on February 14, 2007 8:29 pm:
" A "wonderful" person? This is far from an accurate term for a person who decides to drink and drive, then refuses to take a sobriety test. Anyone else would have been arrrested and prosecuted, and at the very least, been suspended from driving for a year. This type of behavior hardly merits her the term rising star, anywhere. "
another drunk on board wrote on February 14, 2007 8:32 pm:
" Following in the footsteps of our present day administratioon?How sweet.Just like Uncle W.!! "
mike wrote on February 14, 2007 8:32 pm:
" This is why people get away with things and continue to do it time and time again. They think they are above the law. As a voter there needs to be a bill introduces that will change the way these senators get away with these type of actions and they pass bills that put people away for long lenghts of time for doing the same thing. Can i be a senator to i luv to drink and drive as long as its 15 days before or after right!!!!!!!!!!!! "
Eric Johnson wrote on February 14, 2007 8:37 pm:
" Hey, she made a mistake and she apologized for it. Let's not vilify her because she benefited from some obscure clause in the Nebraska State Constitution - she has no control over that. She is a good, bright leader and she certainly will learn from this error in judgment and continue to work hard for the betterment of the state. "
Alexis wrote on February 14, 2007 8:41 pm:
" Article III, Section 15 was put into place so that senators in session would not be put in jail on misdemeanor charges and possibly miss voting on an issue. If the issue was did not pass because of a missed vote they then could accuse the police department of arresting the senator on a misdemeanor in order to influenced the vote. This is to prevent any influence on law making. The senator will still be charge..just not during session. This is only for misdemeanors and infractions, if a senator is arrested for a felony then the arrest will happen. They are not above the law..it just gets delayed until session is over. "
drag racer wrote on February 14, 2007 8:53 pm:
" Now we know why liquor licences are handed out left and right with no argument. But when someone wants to bring in new buisiness and jobs to lancaster county roadblocks are throne out left and right. "
Stick a Fork in Her wrote on February 14, 2007 9:03 pm:
" She should be thrown out of the Legislature for this, especially since this is technically her third DUI offense. How many other times has she driven drunk without getting caught? Also, if she's 29 now, that means she was 19 or 20 in 1997... in other words, underage. Throw the book at her. "
Impeach wrote on February 14, 2007 9:22 pm:
" Her. "
Bill wrote on February 14, 2007 9:26 pm:
" There will be temptation to look at this from a political prism. It is my sincere hope that Senator Nantkes and those who support her will recognize that she has a problem. It would be a shame to see a young life full of potential to be cast aside for some political aspiration. Please get help. "
Jake wrote on February 14, 2007 9:27 pm:
" Aaawww...Eric states below she apologized for it..the DUI..error in judgement? ..well don't we all feel better now Eric. Maybe every drinker who gets caught should just apologize, then all's right with the world. No more DUI's for anyone. Get a grip on reality Eric. SHE BROKE THE LAW!!! "
WOW wrote on February 14, 2007 9:30 pm:
" Eric, You are out of touch. She is obviously NOT a "good, bright leader". She didn't learn from her LAST lesson in 1997, and she doesn't care about public safety. She's damn lucky that she didn't hurt anyone. The best thing she could do for the state now is step down. Her integrity has been compromised. "
Rhonda wrote on February 14, 2007 9:40 pm:
" "She made a mistake and she apologized for it", "she certainly will learn from this error in judgement" these are the 2 most dumbest statements I have seen on this issue. What would be done if this Sen. would have hit a car with a family or anyone in it and killed them, uh oh I'm sorry. She hasn't learned from previous times so what is different about this one. What a great example to the young leaders in this state, get to be a Sen. then you can booze it up all you want and drive like an idiot, but hey then you can go vote on life changing laws. This woman needs to step down get herself some help and really take responsibility for her actions. Next time and there will be a next time she has proven that she will kill someone, do you want it to be you ! "
how many others? wrote on February 14, 2007 9:53 pm:
" wonder how many other dui convictions of senators in the legislature? not excusing her but there have certainly been others and what happened to them? "
The smart thing wrote on February 14, 2007 10:05 pm:
" Would be if she pleads guilty rather than fighting it (and taking whatever punishment is doled out), and VOLUNTARILY goes to a treatment program on her own dime once the session is over. That would go a long way toward showing me (and others) that she is taking responsibility for her actions and is learning from her mistakes (that she obviously didn't learn from 10 years ago). That includes losing her license if that is the normal prescribed punishment for 2nd offense drunk driving (yes I know she did it 3 times but the 1st wasn't "charged" as drunk driving). Especially when you add in the aggravating factor of refusing the breath/chemical test which I'm pretty sure is an aggravating factor in charging/sentencing... "
Wow wrote on February 14, 2007 10:06 pm:
" How do you not see a snow plow enough ahead of time to slow down, change lanes etc. Maybe she needs her eyes examined too! "
Gregg wrote on February 14, 2007 10:07 pm:
" According to Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska State Constitution, state senators are apparently above the law. Senators should be setting a POSITIVE example for their constituents. "
ARF wrote on February 14, 2007 10:16 pm:
" People could have died here, she is lucky no one got hurt. She has gotten picked up two other times, she is not learning her lesson...when will she when she kills someone? "
bad behavior wrote on February 14, 2007 10:27 pm:
" This senator has some serious problems with her character. What a disappointment for her generation and district 46th. "
laura wrote on February 14, 2007 10:31 pm:
" A good leader is someone I would want my children to aspire to be like. The senator's choices are far from that mark. She needs help not only with drinking, but with decision making for the good of all. ANYONE who drinks and drives risks shattering lives. Take responsibility and remove yourself from law making until you can stop law breaking. "
KLM wrote on February 14, 2007 10:31 pm:
" I am sorry to see this happen, but I hope Sen. Nantkes will get the help she needs so she can recover from the shame this incident has caused her and get back to the important work of fighting for the working families of the 46th District. To liken Nantkes' situation to what has become of Ray Mossey - a convicted felon - shows no understanding of the law and no respect for Sen. Nantkes underlying character. She's made a terrible mistake, and I'm sure she will pay a heavy price for it. But, knowing Danielle, I also have little doubt that she will rise above this and regain the trust of her constituents. "
one of the best wrote on February 14, 2007 10:37 pm:
" danielle stands up for hard working lower and middle class nebraskans and is probably one of the best senators NE could have and frankly we are lucky to have her knowledge and experience in the Legislature. she disclosed her prior alcohol violations (which occurred 10 years ago) during her campaign and her district still voted her into office. why now has everyone changed their opinion?! she is still the same person you elected and has taken responsibility for her actions and is moving on, as everyone else should do. danielle is someone who defends these same people who are bashing on her. people screw up - get over it. "
Maybe we should increase wrote on February 14, 2007 10:42 pm:
" senator pay so she can buy a cab ride. "
Pull Over, Mamm ! wrote on February 14, 2007 10:43 pm:
" Let the justice process take it's course. Based on having had her second (+) chance and her track record, I'd expect her to pinball into property and our loved ones now and in the future. "
Scott wrote on February 14, 2007 10:45 pm:
" Get a grip, people! My god you sound like a bunch of magpies! Her last run in with the law was a decade ago! I was a dumb college kid, too! Guess what? I'm 28 years old now and still do some dumb things. You all did. Stop pointing fingers unless the rest of you are saints, too. Do Nebraskans never tire of getting joy out of other people's misery? "
how can wrote on February 14, 2007 10:46 pm:
" police ticket her for a DUI when they have no evidence of it? Sure, she refused the breath test and should be ticketed for that, but what evidence does the officer have that she was legally drunk, in essence above .08? Why do officers do this? Write her a ticket for her criminal conduct and not what you merely suspect but can never prove. "
Opinion wrote on February 14, 2007 11:00 pm:
" Clearly she has a drinking problem! Depending on how pervasive she may even be voting on legislation while impaired. Not only that but she avoided the media like a pouting baby today (saw on 10/11 news), this is not the actions of an adult I want enacting laws for me. She should resign or be censured. "
Nibbler wrote on February 14, 2007 11:16 pm:
" I understand that we are all human but give me a break! A state senator should have the intelligence to not drive home after a night of boozing on a Tuesday night. Resign from office while you still have some dignity. "
Eric Johnson wrote on February 15, 2007 12:24 am:
" It should be mentioned, first, that the Nebraska Constitution does not grant immunity from prosecution from offenses; rather, it grants immunity from arrest during certain times (i.e., during and right before/after session). In fact, unless I'm mistaken, the article indicates that Ms. Nantkes has a court date in March. Additionally, legislators are not immune from administrative license revocations, meaning that in a case like this, the driver's license can be revoked regardless of arrest, as it is not a criminal proceeding. In my previous post, I did not intend to excuse Ms. Nantkes' behavior or suggest that driving while impaired is not a serious error. However, at this point, she has not yet been convicted of anything, and like anyone accused of anything, she deserves the benefit of the doubt. I, like the rest of you, know a lot of good people who have made bad mistakes, and this is no different. Before we rush to hang her in the town square, let's give her the opportunity to atone for her mistake. "
Bluejay wrote on February 15, 2007 12:29 am:
" "Property damage incident"? That spin is right up there with "wardrobe malfunction" and "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." Let's face it "Senator", you were "plowed" and that's snow lie. What a joke. "
tc wrote on February 15, 2007 1:22 am:
" Did any of you read the article, or just the comments from other readers? The LJS article says nothing about her not being arrested due to come article of the state constitution -- that information came from a reader. The LJS article DOES state, however, that Sen. Nantkes has made it clear that she will get an alcohol evaluation and follow whatever course of treatment is recommended. Re-read the article folks, it's right there. "
ml wrote on February 15, 2007 1:45 am:
" Look at the whole issue, not only did she drive drunk but she refused a breath test and chemical test. Kind of shows what her attitude is. "I'm above the law". She has no business representing anybody. I feel sorry for the cop that had to listen to her. "
Good look... wrote on February 15, 2007 1:56 am:
" STOP and everyone take a good long look at yourself in the mirror. The state limit for "intoxication" is .08mg\dl. That for most of us is 2-3 beers or 2-3 glasses of wine. I can almost bet on the fact that %90 of everyone has driven a motor vehicle after consuming this amount. Indeed this is still wrong, but apparently you still feel the need to be on the "higher" level. As for the person who is upset at the "children" elected to office. Im pretty sure that I can give you a great run for your money on political issues and insight, along with state and national history and in your eyes Im just a kid! To that I say, some of the "old and educated" senators are not in touch with anything of the new age. That is just a dangerous! "
Jim J wrote on February 15, 2007 3:53 am:
" Sick and tired of being sick and tired? Try AA. It works. "
oak williams: activist wrote on February 15, 2007 7:25 am:
" OOOPPS! Maybe she wasn't intoxicated. However officers are trained what to look for. When some one hits the backend of a slow moving vehicle, shows signs of intoxication, and lest we forget refuses to take any intoxification test. Eeeh... If it looks like a duck, and talks like a duck. Must be a duck. And this duck was busted plain and simple. Lucky for her that "session" is close. Saved by the bell!! "
Dave wrote on February 15, 2007 7:31 am:
" Senator Nantkes got stopped twice in 1997 on suspicion of drunk driving. Now how many times do you think she drove drunk between then and now and didn't get caught? "
Reader wrote on February 15, 2007 7:31 am:
" TC: Read the article again. It DOES mention the NE constitution and the privileges of state senators. Be careful! "
addiction wrote on February 15, 2007 7:39 am:
" If she was so smart she should have seen that she has an addiction problem and quit drinking a long time ago. On several occasions I have seen her slathering down drinks. Get help for your addiction Ms Nantkes. "
C wrote on February 15, 2007 7:40 am:
" She needs to step down.... she admitted her mistake when she was a minor and has now proven that she cannot be counted on to make responsible decisions. I agree with Laura, elected officials should behave as role models to all, drinking and driving is not what I consider a positive role model. While everyone makes mistakes this one could have cost her life and the lives of others and Nebraskans cannot afford to have that kind of representation. "
Dave wrote on February 15, 2007 7:54 am:
" She refused the test because she's a lawyer and knows the law. As for being above everyone else, she didnt write that law. "
Bill A wrote on February 15, 2007 7:56 am:
" Aw, whatsa big deal here? A little error in judgment, that's all. People need to quiet prying into other people's private lives. "
Please... wrote on February 15, 2007 7:56 am:
" Feel free to judge her for her actions, but please don't stereotype everyone of "her generation." "
she's smart wrote on February 15, 2007 7:59 am:
" danielle is a lawyer and knows her rights and knew she could refuse a breath test and a chemical test...not b/c she was drunk and high but b/c she knows the law. i bet there are a lot of people out there with DUI's who are kicking themselves for not knowing the law as well as danielle. "
Terry wrote on February 15, 2007 8:13 am:
" Come on, cut the girl some slack. She wasn't doing anything her predecessor in the Legislature wasn't doing for decades. The only difference is she got caught! "
ECON wrote on February 15, 2007 8:18 am:
" Come on everyone...I put money that 90% of the people on here that commented on here has went out on the town and drove home, because either you had no other way home, you thought you were fine, or your friends were worst off than you were. She is only human like the rest of us. Come on...Everyone expect polical figuares to be perfect! "
Chris wrote on February 15, 2007 8:20 am:
" As usual the jorunal star decides not to put this on the front page of their website when this is clearly front page news .......... hum I wonder why ...... could it be her party affiliation??? nah "
Mike D wrote on February 15, 2007 8:26 am:
" I used to enjoy going out for a drink, but no more. With today's very strict laws, it's not worth it the risk of losing my license, maybe even my job, and impacting my family. That's a mature choice (even though I disagree with the severity of the laws here). Every time I see our elected leaders acting like they can't (or won't) make the same mature choices the rest of us do, I fear for our country. Yes, everyone makes mistakes, but not everyone places themselves in a leadership role like this, and I do believe they must meet and exceed the same type of self-discipline the rest of us should. "
Jason wrote on February 15, 2007 8:26 am:
" TC, go read the article, 8th paragraph. It states the article. "
umm tc wrote on February 15, 2007 8:29 am:
" Looks like you need to re-read the article (or just skip ahead to the 9th paragraph) "
Dawg wrote on February 15, 2007 8:32 am:
" We can only hope that people accept responsibility for there actions such as she has. Everyone makes a bad judgement now and then but not all of us takes reponsibility for them. "
JJ wrote on February 15, 2007 8:33 am:
" I sure hope she gets some help. I would think at this time she should have more to do than go out on a weeknight and get plowed and be out until 1am. What a way to start out a term. "
think about it "how can" wrote on February 15, 2007 8:42 am:
" Officers can write tickets for DUI when someone refuses because if they couldn't...everyone would just refuse. That's why they are trained to observe many things, not just the breath test. According to state statute they have to prove "impairment" not any certain level of intoxication ie a breath test. FYI someone can register a .030 and still get convicted of DUI if the officer/state can prove they were impaired. "
I'll Say it Again wrote on February 15, 2007 8:50 am:
" Please raise your hand (or glass) if you have not driven impaired - ever. Let's see...one, two...three of you. Pretty judgmental there aren't we now? "
hangover wrote on February 15, 2007 8:53 am:
" Out till 1 am on a Wed. nite? I hope she doesn't do that every weeknight. How can she function properly on the legislative floor every morning when she's got a hangover from the previous nite's boozing? But I think this kind of boozing is common with politicians, judges, etc. "
LeAnn wrote on February 15, 2007 8:57 am:
" Give Danielle a break! She's young and she made a mistake we all have (rich, young, old, politician, coach, etc.!) Seems if drinking is involved it seems to be a major CRIME and strong measures are taken. We need to deal with other crimes too and not just a slap on the wrist. If you rape you should be castrated the next day (I would think that would be a good deterrent!), if you murder someone you go straight to the chair (then our prisons would not be so full), if you steal start cutting off their hands. Let's not worry so much about alcohol and worry about some other crimes too. Do you remember election time where all the POLITICIANS are with their party supporters? They are usually in restaurants/bars... could their be drinking there too? Surely not? "
Jonny wrote on February 15, 2007 8:59 am:
" Bright yellow snow plows are small and hard to see. I'm sure anyone could have hit one.. "
Getting Caught wrote on February 15, 2007 9:09 am:
" I guess if she ran over a family member instead of running into a snow plow that would be alright too....she is just like her predecessors....give me a break, alot of state senators are hard working Nebraskan's that are sacrificing their time for service to their state. Toss out these "drinkers" and put in some real Nebraskans. "
connie wrote on February 15, 2007 9:10 am:
" G@D people! If we got rid of all our senators who have gotten behind the wheel with a few drinks in them we wouldn't have any left! Most are fine legisltors too, and WE elected them! get off your high horses please. "
step down? wrote on February 15, 2007 9:17 am:
" Are you kidding me? Lets open the doors to the lives of all the other senators before you cast judgement on one. Danielle is a responsible individual. She's not above the law and would never consider herself to be. Come on people, we're all human and we all make mistakes. Rise above it Danielle!!! Psalm 9:8 And he shall judge the world in righteousness, he shall minister judgment to the people in uprightness. "
Gerard Harbison wrote on February 15, 2007 9:22 am:
" "Voters in District 46 elected Nantkes, a lawyer with a nonprofit group that works on poverty issues, to the Legislature in November." Oh, by the way, that's the Appleseed Center, a left wing advocacy group. I wonder why the LJS didn't name it? "
disgrace wrote on February 15, 2007 9:23 am:
" She has disgraced the office and the people she represents, I hope her fellow Senators call for her resignation. As for the people who condone this, don't you think our elected officals in a role of importance and power should be held to a higher standard? Bill Clinton was held to a higher standard, same with Richard Nixon. I think its imparitive to hold our privledged elected officials accountable. "
Killed wrote on February 15, 2007 9:30 am:
" My mother was killed by a drunk driver when I was 11. Danielle, you could have been the one driving that car. Drinking to the point of impairment repeatedly (on a Wednesday night?) represents a serious problem and lack of judgment. Your self centered behavior maybe only damaged your car, a plow, and the public's trust in you...this time. What about next time? Please, get some help. Don't take someone else's mother, father, brother, sister, etc from them because you made a poor decision to drive after drinking so much you are staggering around. "
Ben Thar wrote on February 15, 2007 9:32 am:
" I knew of a really sorry drunk in the Legislature, she was an embarassment to the legislator's, her friends and anyone around her. She had sunken to the depths and I am sure her work suffered from it. The voters did not return her the next session which shows good judgement. Male or female, anyone who is starting down that road must get help emmediately. Especialy those who wish to serve others in a position of responsibility. If the young lady gets help right away good for her. If she fails in that or creates another incident she should have the decency and intelligence to resign for the good of the state. All of the warning signs are there for a growing problem. Take heed young lady and remember how difficult it is to be in the public eye. You are an attorney and a Nebraska legislator, behave responsibility, and with dignity. The one thing the entire nation needs now is leadership that demonstrates responsibility for ones actions. "
One word wrote on February 15, 2007 9:34 am:
" RESIGN. "
john boy wrote on February 15, 2007 9:43 am:
" I'm sure most of us have driven under the influence at one point in time or another. However we are not setting examples for others, if people in her position are breaking the law, how can they expect everybody else to not break the law? Also, it's not her first offense, apparently she did NOT learn her lesson. I think she deserves a harsh punishment so maybe she will think about her actions. "
Vern wrote on February 15, 2007 9:44 am:
" I won't even comment on drinking and driving (duh), but exempt from being arrested? There are so many things wrong with our political system, I don't even know where to start. "
RN wrote on February 15, 2007 9:44 am:
" It is not like she is the first person to make this mistake, and I am sure that she is not going to be the last. Like others have said our own President and Vice President have been convicted of the same thing and they are running this country. People need to realize that she is human and humans make mistakes. Keep your head up Danielle. "
hmm wrote on February 15, 2007 9:47 am:
" Imagine if she had been on a cell phone. Same level of impairment people, same level. Studies have proven it. If drinking and driving is a problem and is cause for outrage, then let's be consistent. "
Huh? wrote on February 15, 2007 9:51 am:
" How does "being a lawyer" and "knowing the law" justify her decision to refuse the preliminary breath test and the chemical test. By refusing the tests, she opened herself up to even more charges. She would have been better off to take the preliminary breath test AND chemical test. "
Please wrote on February 15, 2007 9:54 am:
" Before we run this young woman out of town, Lets take a deep breath and to quote some famous sage - Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "
WOW... wrote on February 15, 2007 10:10 am:
" By state law, police couldn’t arrest her. According to Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska State Constitution, state senators — except in cases of treason, felony allegations or a breach of the peace — are privileged from arrest during the session and 15 days before and after. Doesn't that kind of make them ABOVE THE LAW??? I'm guessing if any of us non-legislators were in the same position as she was, we'd be arrested, in jail and just plain out of luck!!! "
?????? wrote on February 15, 2007 10:16 am:
" And...just why doesn't Nebraska have a state ethics committee? This is her third incident. She has lost her credibility with those "no need to have the alcohol" group. "
Grow up... wrote on February 15, 2007 10:23 am:
" I think people are being awfully harsh. Who are you to pass judgement? She made a mistake, I will repeat what others have spoken, how many times have you gone out on the town and thought you were fine to drive home? People make mistakes, Sen. Nantkes is a fine Senator and she tries to get a lot more accomplished than most of the old blow hards that don't have anything else to do with their time and money than run for office. It is nice to have a senator that actually represents her constituents interests instead of their own. There have been 5 other senators convicted of DUI while in office, none of them had to resign...get off of your high horses, and start worrying about some of the issues that matter people. Higher taxes, homelessness, racisim and a war that we have no business being in. Does anyone remember the fact that our own U.S. President has an offense under his belt? I am really dissapointed in those who are saying some really horrible things about a decent person. "
Soylent Green wrote on February 15, 2007 10:24 am:
" Get a grip people! Had she run over someone or plowed into a family or one of the other numerous horrible events described below, it would be considered a felony and she would have been arrested. Also, keep in mind that just because she wasn't arrested now, Article 111, Section 15 doesn't say she can't be arrested and prosecuted later. So relax now please... "
Shocked wrote on February 15, 2007 10:25 am:
" I am absolutely shocked by people with the "it's not big deal" attitude. Drunk driving KILLS PEOPLE. "
Contact her wrote on February 15, 2007 10:28 am:
" I suggest all those blogging here exercise their rights to contact their states senator and pose your suggestions directly to her instead of each other. Her legislative email address is dnantkes@leg.ne.gov , which is also available at our Unicameral's website, http://nebraskalegislature.gov/web/public/contact/senators "
Micheal wrote on February 15, 2007 10:42 am:
" I think it's really interesting that some of you are condoning what "Senator" Nantkes did when she drove her car drunk! If this had been your average citizen you wouldn't have been so forgiving! Think about it! She could have KILLED someone--and you condone that and tell people like me to not be so judgemental and to "get off my high horse??" I don't think you'd be so forgiving if she had hit someone in your family!! "
Perspective wrote on February 15, 2007 10:44 am:
" This was a sad unfortunate incedent. We are all free to pass our own judgements, however, what good does it do to furthur push Senator Nantkes down? Feel free to have your opinion, but let's look at the real concerns facing our city and state...poverty, property taxes, water retention, economic development. I just think there is more to our legislative process than the personal lives of others.....we seem to pass over the fact that our President has some former charges of his own ;) "
Haters wrote on February 15, 2007 10:45 am:
" Why does everyone have to hate on Mrs. Nantkes? Obvioulsy some of you cannot read the article correct, as she will face the same charges anyone else would face for getting charged with the same crime. Everyone is human and makes mistakes. "
Dave wrote on February 15, 2007 10:54 am:
" Bad timing? Not! A Freshmen Senator should be on their best behavior, everybody is watching! Previous stops as well a pattern? HMMM? Give the freshmen senator a fair day in court just like the rest of us, and by the way did anyone else run for this seat? At least she stood up and is willing to take on the job of a senator with little pay. Let the system do it's job. "
bicycle mike wrote on February 15, 2007 11:13 am:
" I certainly don't condone Senator Nantkes's behavior, quit frankly I find drunk driving rotten and it makes me want to puke. Let's be honest and figure that she most likely has done it in the recent past and just did not get caught. With this in mind the Senator has learned a very hard life lesson at 29 years old (I dont give a whole lot of credit to her past issues when she was 19, at that age your just stupid anyway.) What's more I'm rather put off that she was doing this on a week night prior her work the next morning when one has to be on the ball. Here is my concern, many are calling for her resignation, her head on a platter. Individuals by nature can really make some very poor decisions. Although her infraction was very serious are we honestly ready to call for her resignation, her dismissal from our governing body? I find it a little heavy handed. Again, people make some really stupid decisions. Unless there is some deep fundamental NEED for the drink meaning a hard core alcoholic maybe just maybe she could handle this situation with a little help. What if for a moment we took a step back and instead of offering her up to the gallows a few of her fellow Senators buddied up with her and did more constructive things. We have many Senators who have apartments here in town, what if some of these Senators invited her over for a movie, or to go downtown for a coffee. I'm not saying treat her like a child but give a friend, a collegue a bit of a hand in a tough time. I'm not making excuses for her she made a very serious mistake but I'm here to tell you that I'm very lucky to have people who gave me a bit of a second chance after I did things that were really stupid. I'm willing to bet unless she is some kind of hard core alcy (which I'm rather sure she isn't) that this was a major turning point in her life and and "the streight and narrow" is probably going to be her middle name now. Lastly, remember to try and be kind and understand that we all have faults, how would we want to be treated in a difficult situation. Personally I think we should be asking the Senator what can we do for you right now, Heck my wife knows her well she can come over to our place and hang out. "
CC wrote on February 15, 2007 11:15 am:
" Just because she is a Freshman Senator does not make her any less human. As humans we all make mistakes. However, being in the position she is in, I think she needs to constantly be reflecting the values and character traits we want represented in our society. She made a mistake, but it was one that could have been avoided. I commend her on owning up to her mistake, now I pray she continues to do the right things. "
C wrote on February 15, 2007 11:15 am:
" If she isn't responsible enough to make a decision regarding her own personal safety and level of impairment or consider other NEBRASKANS on the road how can she be responsible enough to be part of decisions that will affect ALL NEBRASKANS? I don't consider that to be someone that I could trust with decisions about the changes that need to occur in this State! "
Will wrote on February 15, 2007 11:16 am:
" I am more concerned about her DUI at age 19 - she was not even legal to buy or possess alcohol then. "
W wrote on February 15, 2007 11:21 am:
" has a record, it is true. However, he didn't get picked up for DUI while in office like Sen. Nantkes did. "
Dave M wrote on February 15, 2007 11:38 am:
" There is no connection at all between .08 and "drunk" in any meaningful sense of the word. Nor is .08 an indication of a "drinking problem". Depending on weight and time elapsed since last drink ONE beer can make you over this ridiculously draconian limit based on hysteria and emotion. Even in MADD's wildest (and utterly fake) numbers, which include pedestrians, passengers, people never tested for alcohol and people on other drugs getting lumped together as "drunk drivers" the highest they can come up with is 41% of fatlaities. What causes the other 59%? Mechanical failure, weather, speed, road conditions etc. Can't they happen to "drunk" drivers too, even caused by someone else? Even if you swallow all that crap you still have MADD's own figures saying that 15% of all car trips - billions upon billions every year - are impaired, and that rises to 25% on weekends - so you would expect 15-25% of accidents to be caused by impaired drivers even if there was no effect of alcohol on reaction time, vision and balance. The difference between this and reality is not that great (remember the 41% is A) flat out LIES and B) includes all supposedly "drunk" participants regardless of whether they are at fault or even driving.) Are drunk drivers a problem? Sure they are - when they are actually driving and when they are drunk in reality, not at some absurd Carrie Nation wannabe level of .08. But even the truly ratfaced drunk drive billion s upon billions of trips while causing a few thousand deaths - usually their own (most drunk driving accidents are single car). The odds against a drunk driver hurting anyone are astronomical - speed, age and physical distractions rank WAY higher than booze in what causes accidents. Should we throw away the key on driving over 80? Should we take away the licenses of people who change radio stations while moving? Should speeding stop being a cheap citation and become a felony the second time you do it? The paranoia, false data and hysterical overreaction to moderate drinking in today's society is an embarrassment to anyone who values logic and fact-based decision making. "My XXXX was killed by a drunk driver" is not a cogent argument - it is an anecdote, and may or may not reflect an accident that would have happened without booze at all. My mother in law was killed by an itinerant worker - does that mean we should imprison all those people too? "
MAH wrote on February 15, 2007 11:38 am:
" Yes Dave - someone else did run, Carol Brown. She would have been a much better choice for the position. She is also very willing to do the job and would be a better roll model for our state. "
Jon B wrote on February 15, 2007 11:44 am:
" I am very disappointed this has happened. I have spoken with Miss Nantkes before and found her refreshing. I don't know what the correct path should be for her. She will be charged with dui and will pay for her crime. We have laws that will be used The fact she had a prior record will be considered when she goes to court. This was all public when she was voted in and the people have spoken and accepted it. Alcoholism is a serious disease and only she can determine if she has a problem and only she can correct the problem. If she does go into treatment and would stop drinking think what a role model she could become to the young. Yes, she did drink and drive but if she takes care of this problem and goes on to lead, think how much better of a leader she could be. Don't hold it against her that she knows the laws as an attorney. It's nothing that any of us wouldn't do if we were in that position. As for State Senators being held to a higher level, in theory that would be nice. But in reality they are just people, just people like you and I are. I'm not approving of this situation but just saying that we need to give her time and the legal system time make this right with society and with herself. This dui stop could turn out to be a wake up call in her life. Even if she does damage her political career, she may turn her life around and learn to live without alcohol. I wish you luck Danielle and I hope you can turn things around. "
airedale wrote on February 15, 2007 11:45 am:
" All of you who think that DUI is 'no big deal' need to do a little research into the numbers of deaths, injuries and property damage that is done each year by drunk drivers. The senator is lucky because she apparently walked away from a collision with a snowplow. The driver of the snowplow was lucky because he was driving a snowplow. It is to bad that every person who has been killed or hurt by a drunk driver wasn't driving a snowplow. Yeah, the system should take care of her like everyone else - but please stop with the 'it was only a mistake leave her alone' comments. "
Right and Wrong wrote on February 15, 2007 11:48 am:
" Thanks for the email link below. I emailed her. I think she needs to here from all of us, detractors and supporters alike. She's a public servant and publicly made a really stupid decision to drive under the influence. As for taking responsibility, what, third times a charm for her? Give me a break. Alcoholism is a disease and it sounds like she's got it. She likely does have a bright future, if she quits thinking about herself and starts thinking about others she was elected to represent. Do the honorable thing Danielle, go to AA, get help, resign as senator. "
police report wrote on February 15, 2007 11:52 am:
" It would be interesting to read the police report. It may offer more information on this circumstance and what took place. "
Darren wrote on February 15, 2007 12:11 pm:
" She didn't get special treatment. I got a DWI and wasn't arrested as in taken to jail. I was ticketed just like she was and taken to detox. I didn't have to post bail to get out and I'm sure the senator didn't have to either. It was certainly poor judgement on her part to drink and drive. None of us however can state that she is an alcoholic or that she even has a drinking problem for that matter. Does it reflect on her character, I'd have to say yes...certainly on her decision making capabilities and maybe she needs some help. Hopefully if she does need help and does have a problem she will get it and get better. If she is found guilty she needs to pay the price certainly, no less a price than the rest of us do but certainly no more either. As far as booting her out of the legislature goes maybe that judgement should be reserved until we see how she performs her duties as a senator and then let the voters of her district decide. The people that want her canned right off would be appalled at how many of our political figures are hammered on a regular basis. "
Resign wrote on February 15, 2007 12:20 pm:
" Supporters, don't you think she used poor judgement? Why would I want a senator debating and voting on bills that will affect me when she obviously used poor judgement by deciding to drink and drive on snowy streets. If she's not smart enough to figure out that is wrong, I don't want her voting. "
Bitter pill wrote on February 15, 2007 12:27 pm:
" In observing Dave M's comments below, he seems to want to fictionalize facts that have been presented. I'll conceded the point that if the facts are in error, 40 whatever percent that he states is still a huge number of alcohol related arguments. Speaking as a survivor of a drunk driving accident (I wasn't the drinker), I would certainly like to not walk with permanent limp I now have as result of someone elses decision to drive when 'they'd only had a couple'. If Nantkes was staggering as stated, that means she was having trouble controlling her 135 pound frame, but thought she could control a 1500 pound vehicle better. Danielle is a victim? No, fortunately no one else was. Resign Danielle. Your personal judgement just showed your true character. Do you even care about the district you represent or the state you're helping make laws for? Shame on you. Am I being judgemental? Darn right I am. This was just stupid stupid stupid. Guess she really learned her lesson at 20....yeah right. "
OK let's do that wrote on February 15, 2007 12:28 pm:
" Great idea airedale - let's do some research into those facts about drunk drivers! I'm sure in your research you have found that the statistics are compiled from FARS data filled out by law enforcement and that the key item is the "HBD" check box which stands for "Had been drinking or taking drugs". I'm sure you further discovered that this is based on alcohol tests less than 50% of the time and is entrirely arbitrary. I personally know officers who check that every time they report to a crash on weekend nights. It can be checked if there are prescription medications in the car, or a joint, or an empty wine bottle or beer can from cleaning out the garage or going to recycling. You'll also know that there is no discrimination on this form for the party at fault. Even in MADD's dreamworld 59% of fatalities do not involve drinking at all. Do any of those things befall "drunk" drivers perhaps? So we have "drunk" driving statistics that can be based on things other than alcohol, on people other than drivers, and are even then based on actual tests less than half the time! But wait there's more! Let's do some additional research and we find that half that half who WERE tested were under the legal limit. Plenty of .01 and .02 results on those HBD-checked FARS data that make up that 41% lie! Now it's possible to test .01 with never a sniff of a drink. .02 May have been a shot of chloraseptic for a sore throat a few hours ago. Not even the most ardent MADD partisan can point to a correlation between lower BACs like these and ANY increase in accidents (a little known fact - the studies that have been done actually show a DECREASE in risk for low BACs -probably because the driver is being more careful to drive responsibly) but they sure use them to pad their "drunk driver" stats! It's true - well over half the claimed stats are nothing at all to do with drivers who are over the limit and we STILL haven't corrected for either the "drunk" driver being innocent of blame for the crash OR for how many drivers are "drunk". If as MADD claims 15% of trips are taken impaired we would expect to see 15% of fatal accidents caused by drunk drivers, and when you really do research beyond looking for soundbites and manipulated or false pressure group data you find we're not that far off. The increased risk from drunk drivers is real of course, but is almost entirely due to truly ratfaced stonking drunk drivers who left .08 behind hours before they got in the car and are now in the .25 and up range - and even then they usually kill themselves rather than anyone else. "
think about it how can? wrote on February 15, 2007 12:35 pm:
" A refusal is worse under the law than a DUI is. THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE THAT LAW!!! It is designed so that people cannot simply refuse and get away with it. The problem I have is that she was written a ticket for both. The officer did not have her blow over .08 and therefore cannot warrant a DUI. Since an officer can bust a person for .03, can a person who blows over .08 prove that they were not intoxicated? No, the burden is always on the suspect and not the cop. Funny how people like you allow this sort of illegal activity to happen by cops. A ticket for refusal was justified. Once again, he cannot prove that she was over the .08 limit by simply saying she smelled like alcohol. Think before you type. Thank you and have a beautiful day. "
Will power... wrote on February 15, 2007 12:36 pm:
" Alcoholism is not a disease, calling it so is just a way to make the condition "not there fault". Just because she had this collision does not mean she has a drinking problem or a "disease" "
C'mon wrote on February 15, 2007 12:39 pm:
" Get it under control lady!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
Respnsibilty wrote on February 15, 2007 12:43 pm:
" Through this article i read she takes responsibilty for her actions, let alone how emabrrassing it must be for her. But also there is a pattern, I am just saying,only, to look at it, examine it. If there is a pattern take hold of it now. This is the time "
Take a look around... wrote on February 15, 2007 12:46 pm:
" I don't think what she did is right but we need to stop looking at her as "Senator" in this situation. Look at her compared to the everyday people in this state. Do you know how many people have 15-20 DUI's? Drinking is a huge problem in this state no matter who you are and I find it hard to believe that none of the people helping hang her here, have ever had a few drinks and made a bad decision,or at least annoyed the sober people next to you (Lincoln drinking ban anyone??) The truth is if she WASN'T a senator, she could have killed some people and none of us would have given it a second thought. So let's try treating her like the rest of the community she represents and not harass her. She'll get her turn, just like the rest of us. "
Hattie wrote on February 15, 2007 12:48 pm:
" A drunk is a drunk, is a drunk no matter how you spell it. But that does not have anything to do with being a Politician, other than expressing her politically correct apologies to the paper. She should resign. "
Hmmm wrote on February 15, 2007 12:53 pm:
" I guess we will have to wait and see what happens. "
Nina Rohlfs wrote on February 15, 2007 1:27 pm:
" When you're elected to serve the people, you are held to a higher standard than having only responsibility for yourself. I hope the woman gets help to abstain. But according to my brother, a law enforcement officer who has testified at several trials, one never says you could "smell alcohol" on a person's breath. You say you "smell liquor," as alcohol has no odor, and using the former term during testimony can give a sharp lawyer ammunition for getting a drunk driving case thrown out of court. "
Wow wrote on February 15, 2007 1:27 pm:
" I am speechless. Too bad she can't be arrested. Maybe then she could get some help. "
Concerned wrote on February 15, 2007 1:49 pm:
" Our children look up to the leaders of our State and Government, this is no example for them to follow. I think the punishment should be the same as any other tax paying citizen. I know Senators have a life to live like the rest of us but when they hold such an office they are in the eyes of all and should be proud of the office they hold and represent the State of Nebraska in an honorable fashion. "
dan wrote on February 15, 2007 1:54 pm:
" This is really no big deal. They should just let it go. "
yes wrote on February 15, 2007 2:53 pm:
" It's a sad situation "
M Moore wrote on February 15, 2007 2:57 pm:
" Danielle, I did not vote for you in the recent election as you do not represent my direct district, however, I am a resident of Lincoln so I feel that I am entitled to an opinion concerning anyone's actions who also reside in the same city. Shame on you for your recent actions of drinking and driving. Not only should you know better personally, but you should also be even more conscious of your actions while you inhabit a role representing others that demands responsiblity. Not have you only embarrassed yourself and the state senate, you have also managed to make it even more difficult for young women to secure a role in future representative positions. As if women have not struggled enough to this point, you will remain as a negative example of a woman in government, and doubly judged as a young woman in government. I hope that in your future consideration of important issues in the senate, that you will exhibit more control, and thoughtful consideration to the consequences of your decisions. "
Riot wrote on February 15, 2007 3:22 pm:
" I absolutely agree with Concerned.... Exactly when will our State leaders step up to the plate and start setting quality examples rather then the "ho hum.. no big deal it happens to everyone.... examples? "
jp wrote on February 15, 2007 3:39 pm:
" Why didn;t she take a cab or a bus? Those things run all the time during closing time. Everybody else downtown uses public transportation, is Senator Nantkes too good for StarTran? "
Darrin B wrote on February 15, 2007 3:53 pm:
" I don't know what exactly the people are calling for? Drinking and driving is a crime and she will have her day in court. Anyone who thinks these people aren't human and sometimes makes bad choices are also living in denial. She did lack judgement and should have called for a cab, called a friend or just stayed where she was....or a better choice would have been not to drink at all. Does this mean that she shouldn't be allowed to serve in the Unicameral? I'd say that is up to her constituents in the next election. Children do look up to our lawmakers but any parent who wants their children to think these people are above making a bad choice are setting their children up for a bigger disappointment later in life. "
Aware of the PUBLIC EYE!! wrote on February 15, 2007 4:03 pm:
" You know we all make mistakes and that is life... but when you make the choice to become a public servant your life is now part of the public eye, that is YOUR choice... Each decision you make and the consequences with that decision, good or bad, are subject to public review... It is unfortuniate that Miss. Nantkes made decision that look bad to the public and are inappropreate not to say dangerous... Drinking and driving is dangerous and she seemed to know it was wrong, because she refused to take the breathe and chemical test... by that is seems like she just admitted guilt, unfortunitly we have no proof to how much alcohol was in her system. I feel bad that Miss. Nantkes made this poor decision, but i do not feel bad for the public outcry and disappointment... She is a public figure, who will not face the same charges as the same people who elected her. Hopefully Miss. Nantkes will learn from this, but she needs to realize that her life is part of the public arena... that was her choice. And lets just remember she choose to drink and drive... she must live with that... "
rm wrote on February 15, 2007 4:03 pm:
" No big deal dan says - I'm sorry it is a big deal and the people of the 46th district should be represented by a better role model than this. Is this a role model for the people in this district. And I'm sorry to say I voted for her. She will have to prove herself worthy of holding this office or yes resign. "
think wrote on February 15, 2007 4:07 pm:
" Dan wrote "this is really no big deal". Just ponder the fact that she hit a snow plow. Who knows, she could have ended someone's life if that plow was a mini van full of kids. I feel that it is a "big deal." "
slap on the wrist wrote on February 15, 2007 4:22 pm:
" you guys seem to think that this was a one time thing and that it will change her life around ect...its all BS, she has a history of alcohol related offences! "
yikes wrote on February 15, 2007 4:26 pm:
" She needs to take the consequences of her actions and get on with her job. End of story. "
One Out In The Third wrote on February 15, 2007 4:31 pm:
" Is there any time of the year that the average Nebraskan can qualify for the same "legal invulnerabilty" this possible DUI second offender received? Maybe the Unicameral can pass a law giving us all an "Arrest Amnesty Day" or "Get Out of Jail Free Day?" Maybe have it be a day of our choice so after we head out on Nebraska's highway and byways endangering the lives of others we can be immune too. Good thing that snowplow got in the way...I don't think a pedestrian would have fared as well. The double standard lives in Nebraska. "
Rhonda wrote on February 15, 2007 4:39 pm:
" Well I can understand one mistake, maybe 2 but come on 3. Now she needs to be held at a higher standard then she was in 1997 she is a leader of this state. Mistakes happen but making them over and over again is just stupiditiy. A bright up and coming political mind making dumb mistakes like this over and over again. How would evertone feel if this was Sen Nelson or the Gov. we hold these people to higher standards and should. "
Touche' wrote on February 15, 2007 4:42 pm:
" The people of the 46th should applaud the maturity and genuine penitent nature with which Sen. Nantkes has handeled this situation. ...If only every Senator/politician with like charges could act in such a (human) manner. "
no big deal wrote on February 15, 2007 4:45 pm:
" Are you for real 'dan'? This is no big deal and they should just let it go. She hit a vehicle - luckily it was a really large vehicle and she didn't hurt or kill someone. She was drinking and then driving. Doing that kills people every day. Get real, Dan. "
Recovered Alcholic wrote on February 15, 2007 4:48 pm:
" There are all kinds of alcholics, rich, poor, all races, execs, waiters, moms, dads, business owners, and senators, they should not be held to a higher standard. The human race is a flawed being by nature she has a problem and needs help, don't look down on her, pray for her. "
Republican for BROWN wrote on February 15, 2007 4:50 pm:
" In response to Dave, Yes, Carol Brown spent day after day campaigning for that district. Many people were shocked that Nantkes won the seat. I'm a registered Republican and Carol Brown is a Democrat I'd vote for any day if I lived in her district. "
Get Real People wrote on February 15, 2007 5:10 pm:
" Resign. I don't want someone making decisions that affect me while they are trashed. "
Dave M wrote on February 15, 2007 5:24 pm:
" No bitter pill it is you who have accepted fictionalized "facts" from MADD and other pressure groups regurgitated by pandering politicians and lazy journalists, 41% is a huge exaggeration and is bandied about as if it were scientific fact. Do a quick google search and you'll see the raw data for FARS reports are far from that number, and even then not supported by actual tests of BAC level on the driver. I have an injured neck because I was rearended by a driver doing 75mph in torrential rain. He was stone cold sober. You got hit by a drunk driver and were also injured. The difference is my guy gets a $50 ticket and has his dangerous driving habits dismissed by all and sundry as no big deal. Your guy gets fined hundreds, has his insurance triple, is banned for a year and is assumed to be an alcoholic drunkard one small step up from a child molester. It's not that I support drunken driving - personally I walk to the bar - but the ridiculous disparity between the perception of drunk drivers - even real ones not this exaggerated 41% lie, and the perception of speed, age, and inattention that cause far more mayhem is frustrating. "Drunk" drivers (most of whom are miles away from drunk at .08 or even .10) are the only offenders who are punished so severely for only the RISK of harm. I'm all for throwing the book at those who CAUSE harm by drunk driving, but to me increasing the risk of an accident should be treated equally regardless of why that risk is increased. Why is it worse to risk injury to others because of booze that to do so because of any other reason? Only a puritannical mindset that is against alcohol for emotional reasons would say that there is any difference. "
RESIGN. wrote on February 15, 2007 5:25 pm:
" Resign and get help. Save some dignity. "
mydui wrote on February 15, 2007 5:45 pm:
" Hey! They should start plastering everyone who gets a dui's picture in the paper. How embarassing! Good thing I wasn't a senator when I got my DUI. And about that drinking ban - I would certainly get on that wagon - alcohol should be illegal! "
Snow Guy wrote on February 15, 2007 6:12 pm:
" Every Nebraskan should take time to write his/her state senator, demanding that Nantkes be encouraged to resign. Also, the Legislature should immediately take up a bill to strike Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska Constitution, which says state senators — except in cases of treason, felony allegations or a breach of the peace — are privileged from arrest during the session. FYI, bills in the Legislature can be introduced at any time at the request of the Governor, or by a Committee if OK'd by at least three-fifths of the full Legislature. "
curious wrote on February 15, 2007 6:38 pm:
" I agree she needs some help, but what if she would have hit a mom and her two kids at the intersetion instead of a snow plow...and refusing to do the test...why is this ok??? "
Own up wrote on February 15, 2007 6:39 pm:
" I think she should have gotten the full punishment that any other citizen would have, regardless. I think the laws should be even strickter on the people who choose to work for our State/Government, maybe then they would be more responsible for their actions/duties, and not just get a slap on the hand for their wrong doings. OBVIOUSLY she didn't learn from the first DUI, lets just keep giving her more slaps on the hand, until she kills someone. "
Fairness wrote on February 15, 2007 6:52 pm:
" She should loose her job, just like Ofc. Schenkel did. Schenkel was crusified by the public because she was a police officer. Well, if you think police are held to a higher standard because they enforce laws, by God, Senators should be even higher since they make the laws. Schenkel had NO PRIOR CONVICTIONS and she has lost her career. What's fair is fair I think. "
CS wrote on February 15, 2007 6:59 pm:
" Honestly, I doubt most of 'our children' even know any of the legislators, much less care. With regard to the .08 limit-I have back medication and cough syrup that can cause impairment or a reading of .08. Mouthwash can trigger a breathalyzer to read false as well. 2 DUIs as a minor in 1997 and a driving under impairment now do not indicate chronic drinking, the favored definition of 'a drunk'.As a lawyer, i'm sure she is well aware of what she is required and not required to do for a law enforcement officer. I don't make their lives any easier than I have to either-there are protocols they have to follow and thats it. I would refuse as well-im glad that in this country there are still a few areas where one doesn't have to cow to the State. The right to not self-incriminate is one of them. "
Val wrote on February 15, 2007 7:36 pm:
" I'm just glad she wasn't smoking and fouling up the air, killing everyone within a twenty-yard radius with her second-hand smoke. Honestly, what's a couple drinks here and there? "
Get informed wrote on February 15, 2007 8:02 pm:
" Alcoholism is a disease and people need to be more informed of the problem, besides she has had more alcohol related offenses, alcohol isn't a problem unless it causes problems in your life and it looks like it has cause her some... "
Gene wrote on February 15, 2007 8:05 pm:
" I don't understand why she wasn't given jail time on the 2nd offense, And I really don't understand how OUR Senators are above the law in the Nebraska constitution, What is the reasoning that they cannot be arrested while in session or 15 days prior and after the session.It seems like someone should look at that issue again..It was only a couple of years ago that a city worker was killed under almost the exact situation.. "
John wrote on February 15, 2007 8:42 pm:
" This woman has more intestinal fortitude than most people could hope for. I wish she lived in my district so I could vote for her. "
"No big deal?" wrote on February 15, 2007 10:06 pm:
" The 1st time maybe? 2nd time there is a problem. Treatment is a option, but I don't see how she can participate in a TX program and work a legislative session at the same time? It's really hypocritical. Resign, get better/stronger, gain some wisdom and give it another try, another time. Your not ready. "
Sam B wrote on February 15, 2007 10:27 pm:
" She hasn't even been to court yet and already some of the more hateful and small minded have convicted her. As far as I'm concerned, this DUI has nothing to do with her ability to serve as a State Senator. Comparing her situation to that of Officer Schenkel is totally ludicrous. as Schenkel's occupation, unlike that of Senator Nantkes, required her to drive a motor vehicle. I have known Danielle for about 8 years now and know her to be a fine human being who made a few mistakes. She has and will continue to have my support. Some of you sanctimonious types who are ready to throw stones at her should examine yourselves first. "
Glass House wrote on February 15, 2007 10:48 pm:
" If we paid our Senators more than a poverty pittance for their countless hours and stress of public service, maybe they would be able to afford to take a cab after a long day. "
Higher Standard wrote on February 15, 2007 11:09 pm:
" Lawmakers should be held to the highest ethical standards. This is just one local incident. Look at what is happening nationally and tell me you still think Nebraskans should let this slide. What will slide next, child abuse, campaign finance ills, and back door deals? Other people do get DUIs but other people don't hold an important public offices. She needs to go. We need to expect and demand better from our public servants. "
Resignation required wrote on February 15, 2007 11:17 pm:
" She needs to do the right thing now and resign. "
lucky wrote on February 15, 2007 11:23 pm:
" She's lucky she and the other driver get to live with her terrible decision. Where's her resignation? "
It's Sickening wrote on February 15, 2007 11:30 pm:
" I've been reading comments now for quite awhile...there are a lot here. I have to say I'm sick. I'm sick for Danielle. I've known her personally for several years and though we don't see eye to eye on things, she is a good person. I'm sick by the fact this has happened to her. But just as sick about watching someone you know deal with a major problem like this, I'm sick by the fact people are sitting here writing comments like I've read, comments which really provide no help to her and instead condemn and ridicule and bring her down. Many are uniformed comments. Many are judgmental comments. Many are by people who want to judge when they have not removed the "speck" from their own eye. Danielle, from a friend, you need help. People, from a fellow citizen, get a life. What she did was wrong. What she did was a crime. What she did violated trust in her, but unless you are a member of her voting district you have absolutely no right to call for her resignation. This is not about being left or right, being liberal or conservative, being a citizen or a senator. This is about someone, a friend, who needs others to walk along side right now and I wonder how many of you condemning her are willing to do that? Yes, people die. Thankfully not here. No, that doesn't make it right. Again, get over it. "
Bob H wrote on February 16, 2007 2:17 am:
" Look she is using the Nebraska State Constitution as it benefits her needs. She took an oath to support and defend the US Constitution and the State Constitution. If she does not do it then she can be removed from office by impeachment. So she was right, but whoa Nellie, what about the part about the part that says that the English language is the offical language that will be used in Nebraska in schools, court rooms and like. If she is using the Nebraska State Constitution to benefit her by saying that it is the law then hey maybe she needs to look at the entire State Constitution and make sure that the Constitution is followed as it is written and not follow it only when it is a benefit for her or anyone else who feels like they are above our laws. She needed to obey the police officers when they stopped her. Was she at the Legislature just before getting stopped? If not then she needed to be treated just like everyone else. "
Dave wrote on February 16, 2007 6:50 am:
" If Senator Ted Kennedy can drink his self through a political career,then I say let her serve,after all look what a great job he's done. "
Pete wrote on February 16, 2007 6:52 am:
" Resigns comment hit the nail on the head. I dont want her voting on bills that will affect my life for the next several years when she isnt smart enough to not drink and drive on roads in that condition,snow plowes were out there for a reason. I wonder how long that snow plow did nothing but sit there,for those of you who complained a while back about the bad job they were doing and by the way, the driver of the plow and other cty employes involved were being paid by us tax payers.A person who does not have enough common sense not to drink and drive in these conditions I feel should not be making our laws "
disneynebraska wrote on February 16, 2007 8:10 am:
" This is a terrible situation.....but she's no Ted Kennedy! "
voter wrote on February 16, 2007 8:47 am:
" The dui isn't the thing that angers me. It's the fact that she pulled her "senate card" that isn't even 6 months old that basically impeded police from doing their job. She go's on to say "I accept full responsibility for my actions" BOLOGNA, if she did, an honest person would want to be treated like anybody else and have owned up and took the required test's on the spot instead of preparing some pathetic statement after the fact. You'd think a politician would get dishonest through time and not right after they were elected to their first post. Sounds like a future in politics is where she belongs. "
amazed wrote on February 16, 2007 10:02 am:
" I think the truly shocking revelation in this story is the content of Article III, Section 15 of the Nebraska Constitution. I understand the intent, but it seems that there should be an allowance for legal accountability in cases such as this. On a lighter note, do you think we might get someone to sponsor an amendment to "protect" the Husker athletes from such harassment during their respective seasons??? "
Pat wrote on February 16, 2007 10:24 am:
" Interesting that this ended up on the front page. How many male senators have been picked up. Not that I'm condoning anything--anyone who is drinking and driving (regardless if they get caught) should give serious consideration to their drinking habits. "
get over it wrote on February 16, 2007 10:48 am:
" After reading some of the comments GET OVER IT. Everyday there are millions of people in this world that cause accidents for various reasons. Not only drinking and driving. She messed up and has admitted to it. What else would you like her to do. I am not saying that she should get any special treatment, but the way some of you act you would think she committed a murder. What business is it of anyones if she is out at 1 in morning on a Wednesday? I am sure she is a grown women and can make her own decisions. I have a hard time believing that all of you who have commented about her being out are innocent and have never gone out on a week night past 9 p.m. She should be punished and from my understanding will. Do any of you know the reason she was out? Could have been a birthday party? Maybe some sort of special event? Lets look at the real reason for this article. "
dale wrote on February 16, 2007 11:35 am:
" I totally disagree with Dan. This is a big deal. This should not be a "slap on the wrist". Individuals with high profile jobs need to be held assountable like the rest of us. What if it was a pedestrian she hit and not a snow plow? What message is this sending if we just "let it go"? "
Zona wrote on February 16, 2007 11:58 am:
" I say this to all of those who have DUI's or have driven drunk. STUPID FOOLS!!!! "
Former NE Officer wrote on February 16, 2007 12:16 pm:
" Does drinking and driving make someone a bad person, no.. Is it illegal, yes.. Should you drive even after drinking a little, no.. She is a public figure and people look up to her so she needs resign.. I wish her the best in making better decisions down the road! For all you non believers in DUI's.. I challenge you to go tell one person their child/mother/brother/wife/huband/father is dead because the driver had been drinking.. I know I have done too many.. "
LIsa wrote on February 16, 2007 1:38 pm:
" Yes it is and yes they should, but let's remember that she is a human being just like the rest of us. And human beings make mistakes. Before fingers start pointing, look at your own lives and if you can honestly say that you are better than her, than good for you. Most of you who are making her out to look like a loser are probably guilty of driving after a couple of drinks too. The only difference is, you never got caught. No one is better than anyone else. Instead of putting her down, give her support so she will seek the help that she may need. Nothing good comes out of constant ridicule and criticism. "
Jake wrote on February 16, 2007 4:07 pm:
" These people that say, "who hasn't had a few drinks," and "its no big deal." And" we've all driven drunk" and all the rest of stupid remarks. There are alot of people in this world that don't drink, or drink and drive. What does she think the organization "MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVERS" is trying to accomplish. 29 is too young to be voting on adult matured laws anyway. Thats the big problem, too many college graduates think they know everything in the world. We certainly don't need that kind in the legislature!!! "
E Offen wrote on February 16, 2007 5:24 pm:
" lets quit making excuses for her. She has a problem. Bad decision. "
Harsh? wrote on February 16, 2007 5:25 pm:
" People think we're being harsh? she's been caught twice, that's all we can hold her accountable for, but what about all the other times? Would you be so kind if she had kiled injured or maimed someone, because it was just a few drinks? I'm just asking her to seek some type of treatment, step down and work on getting herself better. I think that's being pretty kind. "
please resign wrote on February 16, 2007 11:50 pm:
" resign and go grow up. "
Sue Ward wrote on February 17, 2007 1:35 am:
" I suspect a thorough follow-up to the story will be revealing, although as Hattie states, a drunk is a drunk. A little humility will go a long way Danielle. Take some ownership of your behavior and shape up. You owe that to the residents of the district in which you reside and represent. (And those of you here defending the drunk drivers of the world ought to have your heads examined) "
Hjalmer wrote on February 17, 2007 6:03 am:
" As I recall, we have a President that had a problem with drinking and DUI, but that doesn't disqualify him from serving. Let the Senator take her punishment and we'll see what happens next. In four years the voters can decide if she's redeemed herself and either retain or defeat her at the polls. "
Dave wrote on February 17, 2007 9:32 am:
" Well if we didn't have term limits then maybe this would have never happen! "
Glad wrote on February 17, 2007 10:08 am:
" i don't live in Lincoln where their is no trails. Let the people give out the punishment, who obviosuly are perfect and have never done anything wrong. Get real folks! Thats what the court is for and they can handle it in march. "
Resign wrote on February 17, 2007 2:00 pm:
" She should resign. "

Ads by Yahoo!