Cable customers frustrated with change
By JEFF KORBELIK / Lincoln Journal Star
Donna Adams turned on her television at 2:54 p.m. Thursday afternoon.
Unable to bring up the recorded programs on her digital video recorder (DVR), she opted to watch live TV instead.
She pushed the button on her remote and her TV responded — eight minutes later.
Related Link(s):
Time Warner Cable is working on technical issues, including problems with the remote, as well as addressing customer concerns about Navigator, the company’s new digital cable guide.
But if subscribers are experiencing severe problems such as the rebooting of boxes routinely or not receiving guide data regularly, they are urged to contact the company.
- To contact Time Warner by e-mail, visit www.timewarnercable.com and click on the “contact us” link.
- By phone:
Lincoln: (402) 421-0300
Auburn: (402) 274-5072
Columbus: (402) 563-4511
Crete: (800) 248-8823
Fairbury: (402) 729-6494
Falls City: (402) 245-2863
Fremont: (402) 727-1271
Humboldt: (866) 611-3142
Nebraska City: (402) 873-9196
Pawnee City: (866) 611-3142
Seward: (800) 248-8823
Superior: (800) 742-7313
Table Rock: (866) 611-3142
Tecumseh: (800) 742-7310
York: (402) 362-6397 - To learn more about Time Warner’s new digital cable guide, click on the “navigator” link at www.timewarnercable.com or tune to “Answers on Demand” (channel 100).
She timed it.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, her DVR crashed after 10 viewing minutes.
Sound familiar?
It does to Tony Young, who continues to have problems with the search engines on his high-definition DVR and digital cable box.
Sometimes they work. Sometimes they don’t.
“You get used to it after a while,” said Young, who pays about $100 a month for his TV service. “But getting used to a mediocre product is a little bit … no, it’s incredibly frustrating.
“We don’t have another option for competition. This is forced on you.”
Adams and Young are two of many Time Warner Cable digital cable customers disgruntled with the company’s decision to change its channel guide last fall, dropping the contracted Passport in favor of company-created Navigator.
The change affected 46,000 digital cable subscribers. Time Warner has 110,000 total television subscribers in Southeast Nebraska.
Complaints ranged from the guide itself — ugly graphics, incomplete information, etc. — to problems with cable boxes after the software was loaded into them, causing some subscribers to reboot one or more times a day.
“We know it needs to get better,” said Beth Scarborough, president of Time Warner’s Nebraska division. “Comments are not falling on deaf ears.”
Time Warner has a “war room” set up in its offices at 16th Street and Old Cheney Road, where engineers, technicians and customer support staff work on solving problems.
So how did Time Warner reach this point in the first place?
In a letter sent to subscribers last summer, Scarborough said the cable guide was changing to make it compatible with other software programs coming down the line, such as caller ID for those who have Time Warner’s phone and digital cable TV service.
What Scarborough failed to mention in her letter was Nebraska was the first Time Warner division to introduce Navigator.
Time Warner is the nation’s second-largest cable company with more than 18 million subscribers.
“My brother in Kansas City called to say they were getting Navigator and wanted to know how we liked it,” said subscriber Kevin Thierolf, who spends about $100 a month .
He didn’t have a favorable report. One of his biggest complaints was technical — his box was no longer compatible to the DVI cables he used for his HDTV.
“I know you can’t anticipate how everybody is going to use it,” Thierolf said. “It’s hard. But there were some obvious things.”
Such as listing whether a show is a repeat or not (now fixed) or having the fast-forward function revert back a second or two after it stopped, the way Passport did.
Scarborough said Time Warner would not have introduced the software if the company didn’t believe it was ready to go. It introduced the new guide to its employees before rolling it out to subscribers.
“Our experience at that point was that it was good to go,” she said. “It was good enough to go to market with.”
Instead, the system paled in comparison with its predecessor. It prompted Scarborough to write another letter last month thanking digital and DVR customers for their patience.
“… the conversion was a highly complex exercise and was not without some inconvenience, re-educations, recalibration of settings, and for some, even downright disappointment.”
Time Warner continues to tinker with the system and urges customers having problems with the software or their boxes to call customer service.
“We knew it was going to be a challenge to implement,” Scarborough said. “Maybe we didn’t position it in the right way. We’re sorry for that. It wasn’t our intention to deceive.”
Still, it may take a while for Time Warner to get back into the good graces of customers such as Adams, who spends $200 a month with Time Warner on TV, phone and Internet service.
“They’ve lost my loyalty,” Adams said. “We wouldn’t tolerate anything else in our house performing like this. We’re stuck, and that’s what’s frustrating.”
Reach Jeff Korbelik at 473-7213 or jkorbelik@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Customer wrote on February 10, 2007 1:15 am:
Going to switch to satelite wrote on February 10, 2007 1:37 am:
Nozzleman wrote on February 10, 2007 4:24 am:
Gary wrote on February 10, 2007 4:53 am:
Dee wrote on February 10, 2007 5:45 am:
nitemare wrote on February 10, 2007 5:58 am:
Lafferman wrote on February 10, 2007 6:07 am:
KH wrote on February 10, 2007 6:21 am:
J.R. wrote on February 10, 2007 7:01 am:
AnotherDisgruntledCustomer wrote on February 10, 2007 7:02 am:
TJ wrote on February 10, 2007 7:09 am:
Doug wrote on February 10, 2007 7:11 am:
Susan wrote on February 10, 2007 7:26 am:
Try Something Else wrote on February 10, 2007 7:46 am:
Jim L. wrote on February 10, 2007 8:05 am:
Navigator Hater wrote on February 10, 2007 8:07 am:
Jim L. wrote on February 10, 2007 8:17 am:
JB wrote on February 10, 2007 8:18 am:
Duffy wrote on February 10, 2007 8:21 am:
JB wrote on February 10, 2007 8:22 am:
Kay wrote on February 10, 2007 8:26 am:
nitemare wrote on February 10, 2007 8:26 am:
Vic Timm of Time Warner wrote on February 10, 2007 8:31 am:
angela wrote on February 10, 2007 8:34 am:
Joe wrote on February 10, 2007 8:35 am:
Glad I don't have TWC now. wrote on February 10, 2007 8:48 am:
Brian wrote on February 10, 2007 8:49 am:
WCG wrote on February 10, 2007 8:56 am:
thanks for the article wrote on February 10, 2007 9:08 am:
JT wrote on February 10, 2007 9:12 am:
Jason wrote on February 10, 2007 9:14 am:
New Satellite Customer wrote on February 10, 2007 9:15 am:
RD wrote on February 10, 2007 9:21 am:
RBD wrote on February 10, 2007 9:30 am:
AJ wrote on February 10, 2007 9:31 am:
Bigmike wrote on February 10, 2007 9:31 am:
TWC stinks wrote on February 10, 2007 9:35 am:
Pay more wrote on February 10, 2007 9:36 am:
st wrote on February 10, 2007 9:37 am:
TiVo Customer wrote on February 10, 2007 9:52 am:
JJ wrote on February 10, 2007 9:53 am:
Sean1 wrote on February 10, 2007 10:03 am:
Jim wrote on February 10, 2007 10:08 am:
iconoclast wrote on February 10, 2007 10:10 am:
Colt Roberts wrote on February 10, 2007 10:22 am:
ramod wrote on February 10, 2007 10:23 am:
James wrote on February 10, 2007 10:24 am:
Go Satellite! wrote on February 10, 2007 10:27 am:
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH wrote on February 10, 2007 10:29 am:
brandon wrote on February 10, 2007 10:35 am:
need competition! wrote on February 10, 2007 10:44 am:
Bill wrote on February 10, 2007 10:48 am:
JE wrote on February 10, 2007 10:51 am:
AJ wrote on February 10, 2007 11:07 am:
Satisfied wrote on February 10, 2007 11:08 am:
Kelly wrote on February 10, 2007 11:15 am:
TV Watcher wrote on February 10, 2007 11:18 am:
ted wrote on February 10, 2007 11:22 am:
MP wrote on February 10, 2007 11:25 am:
TG wrote on February 10, 2007 11:31 am:
Ryan wrote on February 10, 2007 11:35 am:
Kevin wrote on February 10, 2007 11:52 am:
Pull the Plug! Are you with me? wrote on February 10, 2007 11:53 am:
Kearney Resident - Schroeder wrote on February 10, 2007 12:23 pm:
Dennis_Fremont wrote on February 10, 2007 12:25 pm:
Megan wrote on February 10, 2007 12:26 pm:
CS wrote on February 10, 2007 12:43 pm:
James Maldegen wrote on February 10, 2007 12:46 pm:
Aaaargh!! wrote on February 10, 2007 12:49 pm:
ET wrote on February 10, 2007 12:50 pm:
Comm UnSense wrote on February 10, 2007 12:53 pm:
I'm with ya wrote on February 10, 2007 1:05 pm:
Bheer N Ose wrote on February 10, 2007 1:11 pm:
jb wrote on February 10, 2007 1:22 pm:
ConsumersKnowBest wrote on February 10, 2007 1:57 pm:
I'm in wrote on February 10, 2007 2:01 pm:
JL wrote on February 10, 2007 2:03 pm:
Brandon wrote on February 10, 2007 2:03 pm:
TWC (The Worthless Company) wrote on February 10, 2007 2:05 pm:
If it wasn't for RoadRunner Internet wrote on February 10, 2007 2:24 pm:
Steve wrote on February 10, 2007 2:47 pm:
Here's an idea! wrote on February 10, 2007 2:48 pm:
Joe wrote on February 10, 2007 2:50 pm:
TWC fired wrote on February 10, 2007 3:04 pm:
russ wrote on February 10, 2007 3:41 pm:
Wow wrote on February 10, 2007 3:42 pm:
programmer for 20+ years wrote on