Now
Overcast
56°
High
72°
Low
52°

139 Nebraskans now OK’d to conceal weapons

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Feb 05, 2007 - 08:40:09 am CST

One month after Nebraska started accepting applications for permits to carry concealed weapons, 139 people across the state have the permits.

How that may change traffic stops for local law enforcement hasn’t become clear just yet.

“It’s still relatively new for everybody,” said Jim Peschong, assistant chief of the Lincoln Police Department.

He said officers definitely are aware Nebraska’s Concealed Handgun Permit Law went into effect Jan. 3. Officers have to be much more aware now that people they stop for normal traffic issues could end up having firearms.

Granted, police always have that concern in the back of their minds, he said, but now it’s different.

“Now you’ve got a whole different class of people that may be carrying them.”

Concealed weapon permit holders who get stopped are required to inform officers if they have their weapon concealed.

But Peschong worries that some permit holders might forget what they’re supposed to do and pull out their concealed weapon to show the officer.

“That’s apt to cause a whole different response,” he said. “There’s this learning curve.”

Should permit holders forget to tell police they have a concealed weapon, which is required by state law, police may still find out. But not necessarily.

Peschong said the information will be included in driver’s license checks — if an officer runs one. Officers typically run a check for arrest warrants instead.

But police may have access to the information another way.

By law, names of permit holders are not public record, although they are to be available upon request of law enforcement agencies.

In time, Peschong expects to get a list of the county’s permit holders from the Nebraska State Patrol, which is issuing the permits.

“We’re hoping, as I understand that, yes, we probably will,” he said. “But I think right now it’s kind of chaotic.”

Peschong said the patrol is busy processing permits, trying to meet turnaround deadlines.

Lincoln police already have an idea of who may be getting them. Peschong said the patrol asked local agencies to run the records of those who applied in their county, checking for city ordinance violations that might exclude someone from being approved but might not show up on a statewide search.

He had a spreadsheet with 25 or 30 names on it of people who applied.

“We definitely do want to know,” Peschong said.

He said if police get called about a person who is suicidal it would help to know if he or she carries a concealed weapon.

Peschong suspects the names are something people in the community would want to know, too.

“A lot of this stuff just doesn’t make sense,” he said. “Why is that not public?”

In pages detailing debate of the concealed carry bill on the floor of the Legislature, a passage suggesting the names be confidential was barely mentioned.

On March 10, 2006, then-Sen. Jeanne Combs of Milligan said part of the idea was that people don’t know who has them and who doesn’t.

“So that might provide some modicum of safety,” she said.

Last week, Combs asked why anyone would need to know who was carrying a concealed weapon.

“Information should be confidential unless there’s a good reason to give it out,” she said.

Sex offenders could be a danger to their neighbors, so there’s a list. But, Combs said, permit holders haven’t been proven to be a danger so far. And, if the information were public, permit holders could be targeted by burglars looking for expensive guns, she said.

“I see more harm than good from releasing a list,” Combs said. “It boils down to, this is America, this is not communist China.”

She said she thinks things are going pretty well so far.

“I’m just glad it got passed.”

Apparently, so are the 346 people who have filled out the paperwork to carry concealed.

State Patrol Spokeswoman Deb Collins said 139 have gone through the required training and background checks and have their permits to carry their handguns in their waistbands or in holsters beneath their coats.

The other 207 are waiting for their requests to be processed.

Collins said the patrol hired four full-time and 10 part-time workers to process all of the state’s permits in the criminal identification division in Lincoln.

Requests are taken at the patrol’s six troop area headquarters across the state — in Omaha, Lincoln, Norfolk, Grand Island, North Platte and Scottsbluff — although the State Patrol doesn’t yet have a way to break the information down by county.

Collins said they’re getting questions as people navigate the process and seeing fairly steady numbers following the population base. The Omaha and Lincoln areas have the most requests so far.

“It’s going as expected, I believe,” she said.

Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Confidential wrote on February 5, 2007 1:24 am:
" The names of the people who have concealed weapons should not be made public. I feel that we as police officers should have this information but to suggest that it become public knowledge is crazy. The whole idea behind having a concealed weapon is for it to be concealed! So why do we want to announce that so and so has a gun? I can't imagine why anyone would want that information released to the public. "

Mr. Obvious wrote on February 5, 2007 5:52 am:
" Well Chief, the reason folks don't want it to be public record is so whackos can't easily find out they are gun owners and try to steal thier iron. Duh??? "

the martins wrote on February 5, 2007 6:10 am:
" How on earth did Peschong rise to assistant chief? That should be a concern. He frets about traffic stops and a "new class" of people carrying weapons. What kind of background checks are being done? He makes it sound as if spelling their names correctly and being able to distinguish between a .38 and a machine gun, they are good to go. He says it would be nice to know if someone suicidal potentially carries a concealed weapon with a proper permit. Huh? I assume the average thug would like to know the same about his potential victim. Who knows, maybe if has the list he might not commit the crime once he has asked for ID and realizes his mark might have a gun. Hence, less crime overall. I would hope the folks who acquire the permits are just a tad more stable and law-abiding than the average carjacker. As Combs said, it isn't Communist China, nor is it Nazi Germany. Get a grip already, Peschong. "

Jim wrote on February 5, 2007 7:00 am:
" I'd like to know who the paranoid whacko's that think they need to carry a concealed weapon are ... oh, excuse me ... carry'n ther iron! And why do you care - I thought all the criminals were going to be too afraid to confront any Nebraskan now, on the off chance they migtht carry'n ther shoot'n iron? "

Bob wrote on February 5, 2007 7:27 am:
" If our assistant chief of Police truly doesn't understand why concealed carry permit holders should remain confidential, then he's definitely in the wrong business... "

az wrote on February 5, 2007 8:18 am:
" what a great idea...I feel safer already "

Lindsay wrote on February 5, 2007 8:27 am:
" Well, I don't think too many drug addled burglars are going to be checking the internet for the concealed to carry permit holders. Anyways, you have a gun at home...if someone tries to rob you use it. I love the irony of Sen. Combs comment about "this being America, not communist China" in regards to naming the permit holders. Quite an awful analogy, seeing as in America we would be much more likely to release the info of who has the gun. Anyways, I agree on many points with Officer Peschong, only I see carrying a concealed weapon as being more of a liability to the owner rather than them using it on society. "

CSS wrote on February 5, 2007 8:34 am:
" It boils down to, this is America, this is not communist China.” That is probably the best quote I've ever read in the Journal Star. Who in the world is this guy and what decade does he think he's living in? Laugh of the morning. Only in Nebraska. "

Jeff W. wrote on February 5, 2007 8:43 am:
" “Now you’ve got a whole different class of people that may be carrying them.” Yeah, law abiding ones....it's the ones who don't bother with a permit that should concern l.e.o.'s . The untrained or the bad guys. And the bad guys, I'm told, feel reassured that there are places they don't have to worry about running into an armed citizen such as banks, bars, etc. If some police officials are worried about the effects of a legally armed public, simply contact other states with carry laws already in practice. "

JB wrote on February 5, 2007 8:46 am:
" Making the permit holders public record would be dangerous to them. Quite honestly, making domestic assault convictions would make more sense. They are hundreds of times more likely to hurt someone than a permit holder. If anyone bothers to do sny research, they will find that permit holders in every state are significantly less likely to commmit any crime. Peschong needs to work the street again for a while to realize who the real dangerous people are "

Jason wrote on February 5, 2007 9:02 am:
" 139 people out of 1.7 million Nebraksans...EVERYBODY PANIC!!! "

Dan wrote on February 5, 2007 9:04 am:
" Fair is fair. Let's go ahead and also print where the cops live, what their phone numbers are and their shift schedules. "

Mike wrote on February 5, 2007 9:32 am:
" Hi, I am a paranoid whacko! Nice to meet you. I need to carry my "iron" in case Nebraska is attacked by evil space monsters and I need to defend my family against the Gorgon commander and his space fleet while they try to extract our gray matter to be used in their soup. Oh wait, thats not it...I just like to have that right. Just because we don't feel the way you do, doesn't mean we're wacko. "

Confused wrote on February 5, 2007 9:40 am:
" Before commenting about the whacko's who get a permit, become aware of how to obtain one yourself. If you have a spec on your record, you cannot obtain one. You must pass written and gun range tests as well. Personally, I found the extensive background check and FBI finger/palm printing intrusive. However, worth the tradeoff. In the CCW class I took, I would not be concerned with anyone who took the class carrying concealed. In fact, many were retrired security, law enforcement over the age of 50 who had lawfully handled guns their entire life. In fact, no one in the class actually figured they'd carry very often. The majority wanted to be able to carry the weapons to and from the gun range in their vehicles and when hunting or traveling. Given I practically had to sign over my first born to the State Patrol, I figured all law enforcement would know I have a permit. As a law abiding citizen, I am fine with that. "

info lacker wrote on February 5, 2007 9:40 am:
" The patrol doesn't yet have a way to break the information down by county?? are they not using computers for the information?? they are not providing other law enforcement with names i.e. LPD?? They provided them a spreadsheet?? Who runs their data processing and why are they so lacking that things are not being done by computer?? Sure scares me about the accuracy / extent of the background checks, was this thing rushed into and not given enough thought?? "

Why wrote on February 5, 2007 9:43 am:
" The public has a right to know who is carrying a concealed weapon. Unless there is some ulterior motive for carrying a concealed weapon. This is America where public information is public and not hidden from the public. Just like you apply for a building permit, that is public knowelege, why shouldn't CCW permits? Ore are they hiding something? Only criminals need to hide things, not law abiding citizens. "

CKG wrote on February 5, 2007 9:49 am:
" So if the gun permit standards and background checks are as high as previous commentors say, why are concealed weapons banned by law in certain places? A properly trained law-abiding citizen would behave no differently in a bank, in a bar, or on school grounds as he would in Walmart, his own vehicle, or walking down the street. Seems to me that gun owners don't have enough confidence in the process to allow people to be trusted. The police are correct in being very skeptical of this law. "

TS wrote on February 5, 2007 9:56 am:
" Jim Peschong says "Now you’ve got a whole different class of people that may be carrying them." I do not think we need to worry about this class of people. But I do worry about the paranoid whacko's who think we should live in a police state. "

Gregg wrote on February 5, 2007 10:01 am:
" '..a whole different class of people carrying weapons...' - yes a class of people that were able to pass an FBI background check and a criminal record so spotless, they would qualify for a Law Enforcement job. And the comment about drivers whipping out their gun at a traffic stop...THAT'S COVERED IN THE TRAINING COURSE YOU'RE REQUIRED TO TAKE. It sounds like the police are just as mis-informed about CCW as the media. I carry a concealed weapon because I can't carry a police officer in my pocket. "

Malkore wrote on February 5, 2007 10:05 am:
" 'Sex offenders could be a danger to their neighbors, so there’s a list. But, Combs said, permit holders haven’t been proven to be a danger so far.' Sex offenders violate the laws, and therefore get put on a public list. Lawful Carry Conceal permit holders are ADHERING to the law, and thus their privacy is sacred. If you print the names of CCW holders, that's not only illegal, but it tells criminals that they should lookup my address and watch for me to leave so they can steal the guns that I don't carry. "

joe neighbor wrote on February 5, 2007 10:19 am:
" Would a sign in front of my home "Warning I'm packing heat" deter criminal activity ? If so, put me on that list. "

KS wrote on February 5, 2007 10:27 am:
" Sure... lets go back and do it like the old west... This society is becoming more uncivilized...I thought we're a civilized superpower, why don't we have gun battles on O Street? like we did back in the 1800's...would I have time to take cover? KS "

Big Chief wrote on February 5, 2007 10:35 am:
" The obvious solution would be to require all citizens to put a bumper sticker on their car or a sign in their front yard with one of three messages: 1. We own guns 2. We do not own guns 3. I am a criminal & I have a gun. Wouldn't that make it easier for everyone? "

curious wrote on February 5, 2007 11:07 am:
" I don't get it. Can someone explain to me why one would want/need to carry a concealed weapon? I can't think of any situation that I've been in during my 30-some years of life where I was thinking later, "Dang, I wish I had a gun on me when that happened." Seriously, I'm asking, why? "

Mike Honcho wrote on February 5, 2007 11:15 am:
" Sure, let's go to any state bordering Nebraska and look at all of the gunfights going on in the streets! Surely, with all of those states having come form of a CCW law, there must be bullets whizzing by your head constantly! Oh wait, that's not happening...strange. Sounds like some on here are missing their tin-foil hats. How about this for a compromise...if/when a CCW permit holder commits a crime...we make THAT information public record...because now he/she is a criminal (and no longer able to carry a concealed weapon). "

Communists? wrote on February 5, 2007 11:21 am:
" What's wrong with communist China and what does that have to do with this issue? Glad we have articulate, well-spoken senators in NE. "

Dawg wrote on February 5, 2007 11:52 am:
" "Hi, I am a paranoid whacko! Nice to meet you. I need to if your carrying my "iron" in case you decide to shoot up the neighborhood, I need to defend my family against the law abiding Nebraska citizens and not against the rapest that enter my house and the kidnappers that take my children by force. Oh wait, that's not it...I just like to have that right to say how helpless I am when some gang banger shoots my wife while robbing us.. Just because we don't feel the way you do, doesn't mean we're wacko." "

BS wrote on February 5, 2007 12:08 pm:
" To the Asst Police Chief and Lincoln Journal Star, I just completed reading your interview. Shame on you for you comments on CHG permit holders. To villify and pre-judge LAW ABIDING citizens is the epitomy of irresponsibility. These are the good guys. Common sense should dictate that. One simply needs to look at the states where CHG permits have been legal for many years and see that in NO instance has law enforcement EVER been harmed or threatened. In fact, I personally know troopers from three states south of us who comment that they feel much better knowing that they have pulled over a CHG permit holder. As for the Journal Star commenting that Sex Offender lists are public, so should CHG permit holders is even more horse hockey, and extremely offensive. Again, to "criminalize" people who taken the steps to obtain what they have a legal right to is sheer idiocy. Finally, law enforcement is already (or should be) aware that Nebraska is an open carry state. Should the fact that a permitted LAW ABIDING citizen cover his handgun with his shirt make him "insane, violent, etc."? "

sam wrote on February 5, 2007 12:15 pm:
" Nobody made you go get a permit to carry a gun if you want to carry a gun it should be public knowlege, if you dont want that made public, dont get one! If some one gets your address to break into your house b/c you have a gun they probably are so messed up even if you had a chance to get to your gun they will have one also, then what a shoot out that sounds pretty smart, just give them what they want and report it to the cops no one gets hurt. If you get into a shoot out with them you, your family, and possibly more people are in danger, Guns shouldn't have be made ok to carry they just make thing worse. "

Chris wrote on February 5, 2007 12:31 pm:
" Calm down everyone. I think due to the Police chief and the Mayor's out and out mischaracterization of this people have rushed to judgement. Permit holders as I understand it have to take a class that emphasizes de-escalating conflict. Not escalating conflict, hence drawing your weapon. And like it or not, this is a constitutional right. The Bill Of Rights isn't just something you can decide how you want to look at it and chuck out what you don't like. Sadly much of what has been written reflects not only profound ignorance of our system and why it is the way it is, but American history in general. A word of advice, if you don't really know what you are talking about its probably best to refrain from opining. "

Curiosity didwhat? wrote on February 5, 2007 12:45 pm:
" For those who just can't see why...please understand that not everyone lives a life exactly like yours. Some members of society have a profession that requires them to be closely involved in the lives of dangerous felons. Probation "officers", corrections "officers", judges, and criminal lawyers all interact with dangerous individuals, some of which tend to hold a grudge. Victims of stalkers and survivors of domestic abuse also have lives and families who are worth protecting. The uncertainty of whether or not you are going to meet your stalker/abuser on your way home from work, while you get gas, or while you change a flat tire on a dark road is enough to make you consider getting a permit. 9-1-1 and restraining orders are great tools, but do little to stop the cycle of abuse and even less to stop an enraged attacker. "

Nametags for all wrote on February 5, 2007 12:51 pm:
" Honestly, what does it matter if they publish a list? If you see in the paper that Jack Thompson owns a gun does that mean anything to you? If you already know Jack, you probably already know he has a gun, or you don't care. If you don't know who Jack Thompson is, you're not going to know not to attack him unless he's wearing a name tag. Therefore the only thing to be prevented by not printing a list is to keep your acquaintances from knowing you carry concealed so you can surprise them if they attack you. If you are worried about this, perhaps you should find some new friends. "

al wrote on February 5, 2007 1:00 pm:
" It is obvious that Combs, and most of the rest of the people posting here have not been, or do not know anyone who has ever had a weapon pulled on them. I can tell you from experience, it was all I could do not to shoot first and ask questions later. My police training told me to. This is a dangerous situation, and there is NO need for concealed weapons. At teh very least, the law enforcement community must have access to the list at all times, and the info needs to come back with your plates, driver's license, or whatever else they may run your name or vehicle for. I suppose it will be the cops fault when someone does exactly what Deputy Chief Peschong says in the article. Let's see how much money the city has to come up with then to settle a lawsuit. "

Jed wrote on February 5, 2007 1:08 pm:
" The list is private, and should stay private. People have passed a background check, much stronger than most people in this state will EVER go through. Heck, most will never have to prove they have no criminal record to anyone. Now that permit holders have proved it, you think they are potentially dangerous and people NEED to know who has a gun? Why didn't you try to pass laws making it known what criminals were carrying guns? They are the dangerous ones. And on the communist china comment. What's wrong with it? This is the USA. We have freedoms, we have right to privacy.. we don't need everyone knowing our business all the time. Sex offenders are made public because they ARE dangerous and have proven it. Concealed permit holders, passed a check to show they are not a dangerous person... there is NO worries with them. you will pass them on the street many times and never even know. And you will not be any less safe. "

It's about time wrote on February 5, 2007 1:10 pm:
" Thank you Jeanne Combs! "

Jed wrote on February 5, 2007 1:20 pm:
" Why would anyone want to carry a concealed weapon? You've never been in a situation in your 30 years that you've needed it? I'm happy for you, really. that's great news. But, SOME people.. good people just minding their own business, have found theirself in dangerous life threatening situations, and either been badly hurt or killed. None of us will carry because we THINK we might run into danger. That's not the purpose. Do you wear a seatbelt because you plan on having a wreck? I've never been in a wreck, but I wear my seatbelt just in case. A gun is no different. If someone uses deadly force against you, you don't have much other choice than to use it in return if you can't safely get away. You just don't understand it. For TOO LONG only criminals were allowed to carry concealed firearms. And hollywood sure doesn't do a good job of showing guns in a true way.. so people have this negative view of anyone carrying a gun. Times have changed... good guys can carry to protect their life, their families life. Hopefully they never have to. But should that time come, they have a way now. Imagine cowering in a corner of a diner while a madman comes in and starts shooting. Watching your parents be murdered, others being murdered. This is one of the situations where having a concealed firearm is useful. And this is a situation that did happen. A lady watched this happen to her parents. She had to leave her weapon in the car in the glovebox because at the time Texas didn't allow them to carry on their person yet. "

Jed wrote on February 5, 2007 1:28 pm:
" also remember this being public information, would allow employers to discriminate based purely on the fact that someone has a permit. how is that fair? "

One Out In The Third wrote on February 5, 2007 1:30 pm:
" It takes 14 new hires to process the applications and maintain the records of CCW permit holders? What are the 4 full-time people going to do during the last 7 hours of their 8 hour shift each day??? This is hilarious. I can't leave Nebraska...I have to stick around and see what happens next. "

huskerbob wrote on February 5, 2007 4:14 pm:
" Lincoln seems to be backwards on this. Remember that a backround check is done. These are law abiding citizens getting CCW permits. Better to have and not need it....then need it and not have it. Pull your head out of the sand. "

No concern wrote on February 5, 2007 4:29 pm:
" If you are willing to go through all you have to in order to carry a concealed weapon, I am not worried about you. I am worried about the same people I was before all of this. The people who carry a concealed weapon in order to do harm. No one who's intent is to do harm will bother to go through this process. This is a non issue. "

Tim wrote on February 5, 2007 4:49 pm:
" You darn betcha there's a steep learning curve involved here and it appears to me anyway that the steepest curve of all belongs to Jim Peschong. "

Trisha wrote on February 5, 2007 4:58 pm:
" It's not logical to think the information would be used criminally. If I were to burglarize someone, I certainly think I would avoid a person concealing a weapon. "

Noah wrote on February 5, 2007 5:16 pm:
" Isn't it our job to make this a more perfect world? And how would more guns on the street accomplish that? The 2nd amendment does not give anyone a gun. Read it outloud. I say get rid of all bullets and let them run around with their empty iron. How civilized are we? "

Gun nuts are just that wrote on February 5, 2007 6:31 pm:
" The Legislature made sure that even when, and I do mean when, a CCW permit holder goes off the deep end and shoots his cheating wife, or her boyfriend, or just another citizen for no reason, we won't know about it. That's right, the Legislature made sure that the police can't tell us when a person arrested for a violent gun crime is a CCW permit holder. Texas made this same adjustment to their CCW law after they were made to look like fools because of permit holders being arrested for violent gun crimes. Believe me, I feel better knowing police officers are carrying concealed weapons more than some gun nut that went to an 8 hour class and paid a fee. Don't give me the FBI background check bologna either, or that every CCW permit holder has passed enough of a check that he/she could be a police officer. That's just a lie. More guns on the street only means more gun violence. Gregg feels that because an instructor tells his gun nut students in class that they shouldn't pull their concealed weapons during a mutual road rage incident, it won't happen. Gregg, you're seriously wrong. If people did what they were told all the time, you wouldn't need to carry a weapon, would you? Get a clue gun nuts, you are creating a much larger problem that you can ever solve. "

Jim J wrote on February 5, 2007 6:46 pm:
" I dont even tell my family about having a concealed weapon. It makes no equation, hence the word CONCEALED. "

Fred wrote on February 5, 2007 6:58 pm:
" Why do some people want to carry concealed handguns? Because, contrary to popular misconception, the police are not responsible for protecting individual citizens from violent criminals. That's right, the police are not responsible for protecting you. Numerous court decisions have ruled this to be true. Think it's different where you live? Call your local police and ask how many officers they have on duty at any given time. Divide that by the total area the agency is responsible to patrol. Now figure out, or ask, what the average response time is to emergency calls or how long it would for an officer to reach where you may be at any given time. How long is too long? Twenty minutes? Fifteen? How about five? Five minutes isn't that long, is it? Surely you could reason with a criminal who may be set on violent assault, robbery or rape for five minutes? Couldn't you? Couldn't your child or loved one who may be with you? Some people choose to have other options available to take the responsibilty for personal protection under their own control. "

Rick wrote on February 5, 2007 7:40 pm:
" What a moron... Trust me... No one who is carrying a concealed weapon is going to take it out out to show to an officer that has him or her stopped. Are you serious?? "

Mike Honcho wrote on February 5, 2007 7:58 pm:
" Good question...how civilized are we? I think a look at our society shows we have a ways to go before we reach utopia...and in the mean time, the evil-doers will continue to spread their bad will and act upon their bad intentions. Are we...as a 'civilized' society, merely going to abide the crimes of evil people, and accept crimes upon our persons as a fact of life, or do something about it? I know how I answer that question...do you? "

L.E.O. wrote on February 5, 2007 8:56 pm:
" I am in favor of CCW, the law abiding citizens are the least of my worry. It does matter if someone has a CCW permit. They are required to inform the officer. CCW or not will not make a difference in how we do our jobs. As far as compiling "lists of CCW permit holders" sounds like a load of manure. Why have a list, unless you plan on 'watching' them. Wake up Peschong, LPD and LJS. Tabloid Jouranlism is sold in the supermarket isles. Sensationalism is unreal, unless your a politician and you want your agenda announced. Come out of the little political glass bubble and see how the REAL world functions once in awhile. "

Jim wrote on February 5, 2007 9:52 pm:
" A whole different "class" of people carrying??? Unbelieveable. How in the world did this person rise to the rand of assistant chief? Where has he been "serving" the citizens of Lincoln? Obviously behind a desk for too long. I thank Jeannie Combs and the rest of the Unicameral for finally dispensing some logic that the rest of our nation has for some time. To the Lincoln Police Dept; focus on the "class" of people who refuse to abide by laws, not the ones that do. I promise you, MR. ASSISANT chief, I will never "pull" a gun on one of your officers who hopefully, posses more common sense than you do. To those who fear concealed carry permit holders: What are you truly afraid of? Those who abide by laws, or those that don't???? "

Jed wrote on February 5, 2007 10:28 pm:
" gun nuts? Are you kidding? You think me carrying a gun is going to make me want to cause violence? Guess what, just today someone cut me off in traffic and I had a weapon. You know what I did? I just ignored it and kept driving. Open your mind. If I felt so inclined to go shoot someone over a traffic incident, to shoot my girlfriend because she made me mad.. I need no permit to do such a bad act. If I am that type of person, I am going to do it regardless. I would have been carrying an illegally concealed weapon for years if that was the type of stuff I wanted to do with a gun. I don't know about you, but I.. and all the people I know who own guns do NOT EVER want to shoot someone or even have to come close to thinking we might have to. Do realize even if you are justified in shooting someone... little bobby who chose to try to shoot you for your wallet.. he was going to turn his life around next week.. I swear he was. His family will try to sue the life right out of you.. when all YOU did was defend yourself against deadly force used against you. For far too long the only people you know carrying weapons, were criminals. So you think we operate like they do with guns. YOu also need to quit believing the stuff you watch in movies. They do not portray gun useage true at all. We aren't going to be flashing our weapons every time we walk into a room to command respect.. get with the picture people. You're a sheep, living under a rock and you expect your shephard to protect you.. it's not going to happen. You are oblivious to the truth of law abiding gun owners. "

Tracy C. wrote on February 5, 2007 11:14 pm:
" There does seem to be a considerable amount of fear and inexperience all the way around in NE about this. Law Enforcement and citizen ignorance is rampant. I carried in Texas for 8 years before I moved to NE and found it’s viewpoint on firearms surprising. Texas seems to always get called out, and a random fact applied to complete an argument, that usually isn’t correct. There is no judgment by an officer for a CCL. An officer has a refreshing stance since a citizen is confirmed to not be a criminal if they do have a CCL. Officers do not get gunned down by permit holders, this stance is absurd. A stop in Texas works like this, place hands at 10 and 2 on wheel and keep hands visible, puts officer at ease, light on at night wins points immediately, “Officer here is my CCL as well as my driver’s license” “Where is your firearm?” “In between the seat and center console” “Okay, for your safety and mine, sir, I would like to separate you from your weapon, and if you could just stand outside the vehicle, I would appreciate it…” done. No gunbattle. No Shootouts on O street. Omaha and Lincoln have more violent crime than Austin. There are more Rapes and Assaults in Lincoln and Omaha, and Omaha has more murders than Austin. Look that up on Crime Rate Comparison. Austin wins on Burglaries, not violent crime. Concealed Carry Laws do not generate new gun violence, try to look at Texas for that, or any of the other of the 35 Shall Issue states. That may be a disappointment to many of the folks in this string who don’t know what they are talking about. "

Ms. Parks and Recreation Professional wrote on February 5, 2007 11:35 pm:
" "A whole different class of of people?" It's unfortunate to classify all people carrying weapons into one negative category. Once upon a time shooting sports/hobbies were linked to healthy family activities (I grew up in rural NE, guns were an everyday part of our family), larger high schools had indoor shooting ranges and held competitions. Then a handful of terrible school-related mass murders involving guns and the anti-gun media hysteria that gave all legal gunowners and shooting sports a bad image among the general public. Once highly-prized and honored, shooting skills were suddenly equated with criminals and terrorists. Fortunately, there has been a concerted effort to restore the shooting sports to their once honored status. It is our hope that it will not be as difficult many adults think to find places where young and old alike can learn safe and responsible gun handling, marksmanship and the joys of structured shooting. It's a step in the right direction for those of us participating in shooting sports to be able legally transport weapons to and from sporting locations. "

Lisa wrote on February 6, 2007 10:10 am:
" Please don't put all of us into the wrong catagory here. We are law abiding citizens and it is our right to bear arms. And before all of you do gooders get hot under the collar, remember, guns don't kill people, it is the irresponsible people handling the guns that kill people. Any way you look at it, this isn't going to change the fact that there will still be the "criminals " with guns. Those are the ones that you should be scared of, not us. "

Stanley wrote on February 6, 2007 11:31 am:
" Regardless of the personage portrayed by Assistant Police Chief Jim Peschong or Jim Lisec, the concealed carry license (CHL) holder is a law abiding citizen, obeying the law and exercising his God and constitutional right to protect his person, those dear to him and his property from criminals who would ravage him, his dear ones and steal their property. Remember, concealed carry means concealed carry, so the average person will be totally unaware of CHL holders much as they are of people carrying pocket knives. The bad guys, as national crime static’s have documented, will presume that anyone may be armed and therefore select people and bussiness who advertise they are anti-gun and anti-CHL to prey upon. The hysteria and fuss are moot issues since a law abiding citizen in Nebraska may carry a handgun in an "open manner" non-threatingly. I'm really surprised the numbers for CHls are so small. It would seem the "vulnerable" numbers would be high and easy pickings for the Bad Guys. Think about it! "

Just wrote on February 6, 2007 12:12 pm:
" Just because someone took a class and passed a background check does not automatically make him the safest person to have a concealed gun no matter what someone says. Does the background check include a mental test to check to see if you are mentally stable? Most psychiatrists will tell you that some people that aren't mentally stable show no signs. Are you supporters are going to guarantee that no one who is mentally unstable will get a permit? What about that guy last year in Seattle, a CCW permit holder, walks into an office and opens fire killing people. Can you guarantee that won't happen here? Get real folks, that kind of thing is just waiting to happen here. I thought this was a civilized country. If it is, why do we need to carry a gun wherever we go? Look at England,lower crime rate and guns are banned. Maybe we should take a look at our neighbor across the pond and learn from them? "

garrison wrote on February 6, 2007 2:49 pm:
" Tracy has it exactly right. I've held a permit for several years, and carried regularly when I travel where my permit allows. When interacting with law-enforcement, it is not a burden to calmly state: "Officer, I need to inform you that I have a permit to conceal a firearm, and that there is a firearm in the vehicle (or on my person as the case may be). How would you like me to proceed?" Passing through the odd "sobriety checkpoint" I have never once "forgotten" to disclose that information because it is my duty and I am a law-abiding citizen. Oddly enough, a gun battle has never ensued, only friendly discourse. Assistant Chief Peschong is simply another talking head trying to make points for somebody with an agenda down at city hall...I wonder who...who could it be? "

What the point? wrote on February 6, 2007 3:19 pm:
" If you have to carry your piece in "waistbands or in holsters beneath their coats" there is no fun in it. I wanted a permit so I could carry my piece on a holster like Marshall Dillon. By my leg. So everyone could see it and respect me for it. I already bought my chaw and my ten gallon hat. Good thing they don't know I am suicidal or they might take away my permit. I want to walk down the street feeling that iron in my hot fist... makes me feel like a real man, you know? Tells the world I am somebody. Like my big tall pickup truck 4-wheeler thats big as a building. I need those things. "

Tim wrote on February 6, 2007 5:19 pm:
" We can't trust trained individuals complete with criminal background checks with concealed firearms? Then how on earth can we trust the general public with alcohol? "

WHAT? wrote on February 6, 2007 5:51 pm:
" Guns were around long before this law was passed. People who are suicidal, or imbalanced, and bent on committing suicide/violence with a gun...why would they need a permit? There is no permit required to commit a crime! Some of you will be waiting with baited breath for the first news of permit-holder to do something...anything... so you can shout triumphantly! You are the people I worry about. Civilized? I think not. "

Douglas Novak wrote on February 6, 2007 5:57 pm:
" Upon reading, I see the real nuts. Should the LJS provide a list of the commenters to the police? Those who have no experience handling firearms are screaming the loudest and motivated by ignorant fear. I have no desire to carry because it is just another liability to my time but I certainly hope that every person in this state who can pass the test and is experienced with fire arms does so. Somehow I feel at a disadvantage when only the lawless are armed. Am I whacko? A sincere Thank you to Senator Combs. PS I reserve the right to change my mind. I may want to legally carry a gun someday if I have to rely on law enforcement like the man interviewed for this story. "

Joe wrote on February 6, 2007 7:50 pm:
" My worries are not the people with the permits, it's all those that carry without permits. Those people are breaking a law and know it all to well, that also makes them a concern for the rest of us. I am affraid that is not the most peacful country and guns have caused problems but as a hunter I will say that people with permits carry for their own reasons. I will get a permit after the dust settles and everybody gets their ducks in a row, the only reason I will get the permit is for my car when travleing to and from a hunting location. "

Tracy C. wrote on February 6, 2007 11:57 pm:
" According to a report by the United Nations, England and Wales have the highest crime rate among the world's leading economies. According to the comparison of international crime statistics produced by the UN's Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, England and Wales had 9,766 crimes for every 100,000 people. America had 8,517. The UN reports also shows that England and Wales are the second-worst places in the world for assaults. I understand many folks are going to make up facts to support an arguement, but the comments are typical of folks that are unmindful and disregarding on a firearms topic. Imagined statistics are common place on this subject, and always assumed, because it deals with something that gleans a negative connotation and an assumed mantle of goodness if a person is against a firearms culture today. "