Now
Fair
62°
High
81°
Low
62°

Community members share their visions

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By HILARY KINDSCHUH / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 - 12:22:54 am CST

The talk wasn’t about 2015 Vision’s ideas for Lincoln, it was about Lincoln’s visions for the group.

As 11 people filtered into the classroom at Lincoln North Star High School, group facilitator Chris Andersen wrote on the marker board the question of the evening: How would the 2015 Vision help Lincoln as a community?

About 130 people came to North Star on Wednesday night for the third of four community conversations about revitalization projects proposed by 2015 Vision, a group of local leaders that is proposing projects it says are necessary to keep the city’s economy growing and to keep its best and brightest young people from moving away.

One session left

Vision 2015 has held three of four community conversations about ideas for Lincoln’s future. The fourth talk is Wednesday at Scott Middle School, 2200 Pine Lake Road. Doors open at 5 p.m., presentations begin at 5:30 p.m., and the session will end by 8:30 p.m.

The projects include building a new arena, convention center and hotel in the Haymarket; establishing a research and development corridor stretching from downtown to the UNL campus; and moving the State Fair to the grounds of the Lancaster Event Center to give UNL room to grow.

Members hope to accomplish the group’s goals through public-private partnerships, much like the one among the city, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Nebco that produced the Haymarket Park baseball stadium and softball complex.

The group is partnering with Leadership Lincoln and several community leaders for the meetings, which include an overview of the projects, followed by small-group discussions and a one-hour question-and-answer session.

Back in the classroom, the group discussed various aspects of the projects.

Mike Stroup said he thought the proposal for a new arena, convention center and hotel would have the biggest impact on the city.

“I hope people see past the word ‘concerts,’” Stroup said. “It’s not just about concerts — it’s about the whole package.”

The arena could also bring in conventions, sports functions and other sources of revenue for the city by bringing in visitors, who would spend money while they’re here, he said.

“They stay in our hotels, eat in our restaurants, buy in our shops,” Stroup said.

Lyle Bigley said because many of the proposals would depend on tourism for revenue, focusing on bringing a research and development corridor to UNL “seems to be the only way money would come in for sure.”

The small-group discussion also raised a lot of questions.

Dean Barrett wanted to know whether there would be adequate parking in the Haymarket and downtown.

Lincoln Deputy Fire Chief Pat Borer wondered whether the city has the population and infrastructure to support the project.

Richard Esquivel asked whether John Q. Citizen would be able to afford the events that would come after the projects were completed.

Barrett asked how the city would keep housing affordable and attractive so people would want to live here.

As the end of the discussion nears, Andersen posed a final question: “Five years from today, if we look back on this ... how do we measure success?”

Earlier that evening, before the meeting began, 2015 spokesman Kent Seacrest praised the questions people had been raising at the community conversations.

“We’re not getting any broad sense at all that any of the pillars are wrong,” Seacrest said. “It’s more a question of ‘how?’”

And that’s a great question, he said.

“They’ve given us our assignment to go do our homework and get some answers.”

Reach Hilary Kindschuh at 473-7120 or hkindschuh@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
russell wrote on February 1, 2007 8:31 am:
" Everybody is excited about sports/conventions but the fact is that industry hires minimum wage employees on a as needed basis & the hotels etc. send their profits out of town. However the research industry requires high wage employees (like UNL grads) & they are here 365 days a year who own homes (property taxes) plus they will shop here (sales tax). Lincoln must invest in the research area. "

Cheryl wrote on February 1, 2007 9:07 am:
" R&D is a cost.... it is the end product that may or may not generate revenue. Why are drug costs so high, companies try to recoup huge investments? The cost of R&D isn't inexpensive and is this an attempt to subsidize another project to manipulate the taxpayer? It might make more sense to work with potential partners rather that build without a clear vision. "

Billy wrote on February 1, 2007 9:12 am:
" Build first and apologize later. It strikes me as curious the pillars are suggested before getting an idea of what the client wants. Are the architects placing the horse ahead of the cart? "

J wrote on February 1, 2007 9:42 am:
" Five years from now they will still be having meetings! "

Pillared Out wrote on February 1, 2007 9:51 am:
" Still looks like a sub committee for and of local Republicans. It also looks like the primary beneficiaries are the handful with the vision who are trying to market plans to build their business interests through more property tax initiatives. "

Geo wrote on February 1, 2007 9:54 am:
" Lincoln always places the cart before the horse, hasn't anyone noticed? Its funny to read the articlessss in my former city/state and they build memorials, roads, interstate bypasses & you name it and its always PRIVATE DONATIONS. Never do you see "public" funds, which means sock the taxpayer again and again!! These 2015 meetings are to twist & turn and suck the taxpayers into whims or their desires. Lincoln seems to have a record of saying yes and voting for anything then growl when their tax bills show up and they wonder how they are going to live!! Lincoln & Nebraska already soaks everyone for whatever they buy. For years and years when I came back to Nebraska I'd look & look for a reasonable motel and finally end up in a undesirable one. Finally learned to gas up & eat & stay in a motel over the border. Alot of people had told me the same thing, "don't buy in Nebraska" When you don't see a packed baseball park or packed concerts or packed state fair, it seems theres a problem that people can't afford to come here, not to mention its common knowledge that Lincoln is NOT a place of welcome or fun. Its a place of, stick it to them and get all their doe like we do the property taxpayers. "

Mike wrote on February 1, 2007 11:28 am:
" Lincoln is way behind the times when it comes to arenas and entertainment venues. Take away UNL...what is there. It's about time someone stepped up and wants to do something progressive for this city. The State Fair has no business where it is. Move it to Grand Island. "

CJ wrote on February 1, 2007 12:58 pm:
" I am relieved that the business leaders in this city are taking action on these issues. Currently our city is so broke that we must turn to the private businesses for expertise and assistance. I commend the efforts of these busy people for volunteering their time and taking initiative. "

Darla wrote on February 1, 2007 1:43 pm:
" Too long obsructionists have sought crippling perks for developers. Costs kept being shifted to the public and property taxes became excessive and have drained cash that could have, should have been generating economic growth and sales tax revenue. The same movers and shakers behind this initiative have been able to stand up for better governance in the past decade. It isn't a surprise they have a roll out that takes us nearly two mayoral terms into the future...that is near sighted, not a long term vision. "

Janet Poley wrote on February 2, 2007 3:11 pm:
" The lack of business and financial analysis relative to 2015 is quite shocking. Lincoln has lots of problems, particularly with respect to infrastructure including the airport and poor telecommunications services. Some of the projects stuck together in 2015 are already underway and will continue. The big public price tag issues require a lot more analysis. Also at the North Star meeting there was no discussion of who pays for removal of railroad tracks and the environmental clean-up that will be required in that area. I suggest not holding any more meetings until leadership has done its homework. "