Now
Fair
83°
High
82°
Low
63°

Immigration reform needs Nebraskans

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Thursday, Jan 25, 2007 - 11:56:09 pm CST

All of Nebraska’s congressional delegation should join Sen. Chuck Hagel and President Bush to finally enact real immigration reform.

Prospects that the long impasse on the controversial topic finally can be broken are the brightest in years.

House Republicans torpedoed reform attempts last year in a failed attempt to exploit anti-immigrant sentiment in the November election.

Bush put the issue on the table again this week in his State of the Union speech when he identified immigration reform as one of his top four domestic priorities.

True immigration reform must be comprehensive, including better security at borders, tougher penalties for employers who hire illegal immigrants, a guest workers program and a path to citizenship.

Congress took a step forward toward one of those goals last year when it approved a 700-mile fence at the U.S.-Mexican border. The U.S. Border Patrol also is in the process of being doubled in size.

But piecemeal solutions aren’t enough. It will take years to build the fence, and even when it is completed, it will cover only a portion of the border, which is about 1,951 miles long.

Bush put the issue succinctly: “Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border — and that requires a temporary worker program. We should establish a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis. As a result, they won’t have to try to sneak in, and that will leave border agents free to chase down drug smugglers and criminals and terrorists.”

The November election may have provided the congressional support needed to fully address the problem.

Support for comprehensive reform is fairly strong in the Senate, which passed a reasonable bill last year. Last year, House leadership was intransigent on reform as it pursued its shortsighted and ultimately futile election strategy.

Now Democrats say they need support from 50 to 60 of the 202 House Republicans in order to win passage.

Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who supports comprehensive reform, predicted that “a good section of my party” will join in the reform effort.

Nebraska’s three House members and Sen. Ben Nelson should be among them. Immigration reform has been stalled too long. It’s time for Republicans and Democrats to work together for a realistic comprehensive solution.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
OK wrote on January 26, 2007 8:20 am:
" Path to citizenship for people who broke the law - shame on LJS. "

john doe wrote on January 26, 2007 10:09 am:
" Yes Congress did approve the fence, but no money to build it. "

OK OK wrote on January 26, 2007 11:43 am:
" OK, what is your solution. Illegal immigrants are here regardless if you want to label them criminal or not, and they are not about to just pack up and leave. So something must be changed to restore some sort of order in the situation. What is with this "stay the course" mentality that has people fearful of new ideas? "

Bryan wrote on January 26, 2007 11:46 am:
" Not sure that "reform" is what is needed, why can't we just enforce the laws already on the books? How novel an idea is that! "

john doe wrote on January 26, 2007 2:26 pm:
" Fine the immigrants that are here, let them stay as long as they have no criminal records in their home countries. If they do Deport them. No drivers licenses until they can read and speak English, (it only makes sense they signs are in English). And actually enforce the border, build the fence/wall whatever its going to be, and of course enforce the laws. "

Kenneth H. Zike wrote on January 26, 2007 3:40 pm:
" Hagel, is really proposing amnesty for the illegals already here. You can dodge around the word, and suggest, recommend and propose. The truth is still there. Hagel, and I'am sorry to say most politicians, who receive large sums of contributions from the employers of the illegals, are leaning towards giving the millions here a pass. If and when they enact a new law, they probably will not enforce it any better than they have enforced those currently on the books. I would vote for the devil if he'd really do something about the immigration problem. How do you know when a politician is lying ? ' When he starts talking'. "

Pedro wrote on January 26, 2007 3:48 pm:
" Bush seems to be ignoring the rule of law and has a backdoor approach to cheap labor and exploitation of humans for corporate gain. Is that the reform moral Christians really want? It is not "liberation theology" of the Catholic church I grew up with. "

joke wrote on January 26, 2007 3:51 pm:
" So they come with a work permit and then won't leave and the law will not remove them. You will have ten times as many here now with paper work so they will be able to get goverment aid. Great idea. "

Dave wrote on January 26, 2007 7:47 pm:
" If I hear Bush say one more time "No Amnesty" I'll puke. He says learn english get a job and go to the end of the line! What line,they get to stay here and wait until their name comes up? That's AMNESTY.Do you really think that the ones that come over on a guest worker program will leave when their suppose to? I think not! If you let the 12 million stay that are already in the country,that will only encourage another 12 million to to slip across the border.The bottom line is they broke the law. "

Joe wrote on January 26, 2007 8:16 pm:
" Line jumpers should not be rewarded. Follow the legal process of immigrating to the USA. It's not rocket science. "

Sean1 wrote on January 27, 2007 5:08 am:
" Enforce the law. Deport those who are in this country illegaly. No amnesty. Period. To do otherwise is to exploit immigrants with wages that amounts to nothing more than slave labor. "

Jerry wrote on January 27, 2007 8:33 am:
" Illegal, this word keeps being omitted from all of the immigration reform dialogue. Additionally, who is going to police those who are temporarily working here to ensure they go back? "

Tim wrote on January 27, 2007 10:25 am:
" Why do Nebraskans harbor so much hatred and intolerance? "

Islander wrote on January 27, 2007 11:33 am:
" I've got an idea: Let's deport all the intolerant and hateful Nebraskans and Midwesterners! Then this state could really get on a progressive path toward a more diverse, fulfilling and productive future! "

Granyhuskr wrote on January 27, 2007 1:12 pm:
" No freebies for anyone here illegally..no free medical..no free education..no free aid of any kind...as any good parenting book states...don't make rules you aren't going to enforce..same should apply for government.. "

islander wrote on January 27, 2007 1:34 pm:
" It is not being intolerant or hateful to ask people to follow the law. "

unbelieveable wrote on January 27, 2007 5:34 pm:
" We should be intolerant of those who break the law. Problem is people don't see illegal immigration as a criminal act - which it is. If legal citizens broke the exact same laws, they would be held accountable - not so for illegals. Hypocrisy in action! "

Jared wrote on January 28, 2007 2:15 pm:
" Forget the fence. If every employer would take a digital picture and copies of their paperwork, and send the stuff to INS, where they would have a digital picture on file of anyone who "legally" entered the united states. If everything checks out, hire them, if it doesn't check out, they must have illegal reasons to be here so charge them with breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, sentence them to some jail time, then deport them. Any employer who helps catch illegal immigrants could be rewarded a couple hundred bucks, which would encourage their cooperation. This would be much cheaper then a darn fence. Don't confuse strictness with untolerance. I don't tolerate murder, rape, robbery, or many other crimes, why should any of us tolerate "illegal" immigration? "

whatever wrote on January 29, 2007 5:03 am:
" Upholding our laws and expecting people to obey them is not hateful or intolerant. I think most people would be just fine with immigration as long as it is legal and as long as their is a requirement to assimilate into this country. Refusing to learn English and expecting preferential treatment is the height of arrogance. "