Now
Fair
77°
High
86°
Low
55°

Kids could drink communion wine, after all

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Jan 17, 2007 - 12:47:23 am CST

Sen. Lowen Kruse has decided to sidestep a controversy created by his proposal to eliminate all instances where teens can legally drink. Kruse will offer an amendment to assure teens can drink wine at communion.

But his bill would still ban minors drinking at home.

The Omaha senator said he welcomed the uproar around his bill, LB261, because it meant people were paying attention to teen drinking.

Developments on the ninth day of the first session of the 100th Nebraska Legislature, Jan. 16, 2007:

ON THE FLOOR:

SMOKING BAN: — Some state lawmakers are calling for a statewide smoking ban. Sen. Joel Johnson of Kearney introduced a bill (LB395) that he said would impose a ban modeled after the one in Lincoln. The Lincoln ban prohibits smoking in all indoor workplaces, including bars and restaurants. Johnson said a statewide ban would improve the health of residents and prevent competition between cities and businesses that have different smoking laws. Omaha also has a smoking ban, but it is less restrictive than the one in Lincoln. State lawmakers have failed in the past to impose a statewide smoking ban.

WITEK BILL: — A legal avenue that led to Kate Witek being nominated as a candidate for state auditor would be blocked under a measure (LB394) brought by Sen. Carol Burling of Kenesaw. A judge ruled last year that Witek could be nominated by the state Democratic Party for her old job — state auditor — after the primary election. The bill would prevent such nominations. Instead, they could only occur in cases where nominations were vacated, or in special elections.

PUBLIC RECORDS: — Currently, people can ask government bodies for all documents produced within certain time frames. But residents would have to get to the point under a measure (LB391) introduced by Sen. Mick Mines of Blair. The bill would allow officials to deny requests that lacked descriptions of specific subject matter being sought. The bill would also put new regulations on what the public can speak about during open meetings. Mines wants comments made by the public to pertain to agenda items “as allowed by the individual presiding over the meeting.”

LOTTERY MONEY: — A portion of lottery proceeds could be used to fight drug crime and catch violent criminals. A proposed constitutional amendment (LR11CA) would divert 3 percent of lottery proceeds from the Nebraska Environmental Trust Fund to a fund benefiting the Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. The money would be given by grant to local law enforcement. The first $500,000 of lottery proceeds goes to the state’s Compulsive Gamblers Assistance Fund. After that payment, 44.5 percent goes to the environmental trust fund, 44.5 percent to education, 10 percent to the State Fair and the remaining 1 percent to the compulsive gamblers fund. Under this legislation, the environmental fund would receive 41.5 percent. The environmental trust fund awards nearly $10 million every year in grants for conservation, recycling and pollution control. Sen. Mike Flood of Norfolk introduced the resolution.

TAX BRACKETS: — A bill (LB436) from Sen. Ron Raikes of Lincoln is a counterproposal to the income tax cuts being pushed by Gov. Dave Heineman. Raikes wants to reduce from four to two the number of tax brackets and increase both standard deductions and personal-exemption credits, among other things. The plan could reduce taxes by a total of roughly $150 million to $175 million annually, which is about $100 million less than Heineman’s plan.

INCOME TAX CREDIT: — Sen. Tom White of Omaha introduced a bill (LB453) that would provide an income tax credit. The credit would be based on property taxes paid the previous year and couldn’t exceed $500.

PROPERTY TAX LEVY: Sen. Chris Langemeier of Schuyler is also eyeing property taxes, but with a different plan. He wants to drop the maximum property tax levy school districts can set without a lid override from the current $1.05 per $100 of valuation to $1 beginning next year.

EDUCATION LOANS: Another bill aimed at reducing taxes, (LB459) from Sen. Tim Gay of Papillion, would provide income tax deductions for interest on education loans.

AG PLATES: — A bill introduced by Sen. Philip Erdman of Bayard would create license plates “reflecting support for agriculture in Nebraska.” The agriculture plates would carry an extra $15 fee, or $40 for personalized plates. Most of that money would go to an Agricultural Research Fund, which the bill (LB419) would create to be administered by the Department of Agriculture.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “I’ve given my life to this, and I’d like to see some things change,” said Sen. Gwen Howard of Omaha, who is pushing legislation to limit social workers’ caseloads. Howard worked as a child welfare case worker for 34 years and said she sometimes had as many as 50 cases.

And he never really intended for teens to be arrested for sipping wine as a part of communion when he proposed all exceptions to teen drinking be removed from state law, he said.

Kruse said he assumed common sense would prevail — and the tiny amount of alcohol offered at communion would not rise to a criminal offense.

But people responded as if the senator intended no minor should be allowed to take wine with communion.

His revised version would likely allow minors to consume up to two ounces of alcohol as a part of a religious ceremony.

That would expand the exemption to Jewish ceremonies conducted at home, said Kruse, a retired minister in the Methodist Church, where grape juice is used in ceremonies.

It would accommodate the little glasses Lutherans use, he said, and the communion cup for Catholics.

But Jim Cunningham, who represents the Nebraska Catholic Conference, said the simplest solution is to keep the current language allowing youth to use alcohol at a place of worship in a religious ceremony.

“I cannot imagine there is a shred of evidence that young people receiving holy communion have caused any problem relating to consumption of alcohol,” he said. “Without any evidence of that I cannot fathom on what basis there is a need to eliminate that exception.”

“It is a reasonable, respectful accommodation that has a long history behind it, and it ought to be left alone,” he said.

Kruse said his amended bill would still ban minors drinking in their own home, even with their parents’ permission.

“What remains is a well-supported effort to stop teen drinking,” he wrote in an opinion piece supporting his stand.

Kruse also pointed out a companion bill, LB336, increases penalties for adults who procure alcohol for minors.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
whatever wrote on January 17, 2007 5:33 am:
" Well, it's nice to see that Sen. Kruse has backed off a bit on his crusade to interfere with religious practices of the non-Methodists out there. While the rest of his bill is well intentioned, it will only serve to drive teen drinking further "underground" and will likely enhance the use of illegal drugs. When a society continues to criminalize behaviours and actions it only increases the efforts people make to get around the law. It makes people more secretive and "dishonest". The only "positive" thing that comes of over regulation is an increase in the prison eligible population and the increased stress placed on law enforcement. This is a "positive" because it forces "law enforcement" the "judiciary" to further dilute it's resources and ability to enforce laws. This in an environment where there simply are not the funds to enhance these "organizations", nor enough qualified individuals to take on positions in these organizations due to the increased "criminalization" of our population. "

Grateful for term limits! wrote on January 17, 2007 7:06 am:
" Over the past several years, opponents of term limits, including the editorial writers for the state's 2 largest newspapers, have done considerable hand-wringing and worrying about the mayhem that might befall the legislature with so many new, inexperienced senators making law for the state. Take another look. Senator Lowen Kruse introduced a bill that would have infringed on the right of a church to use wine for holy communion for young adults. Kruse is a veteran senator, elected in 2000. Look at another senator, Ray Aguilar, from Grand Island. He has introduced a bill to give illegals, repeat illegals, the right to drive without showing a valid SS number, and he has also introduced a bill to mandate that 8 year old children be forced to sit in a child seat! Ray Aguilar is also a veteran senator, elected in 2000. So it appears that all of the dire warnings issued by opponents of term limits were scare tactics. Nebraska voters knew what they were doing when they overwhelmingly voted for term limits...not once, not twice, but three times. Thank you, voters!! "

Amazed. wrote on January 17, 2007 7:28 am:
" One of the more rediculous things I have heard... "

Eric wrote on January 17, 2007 7:42 am:
" Just a few days ago, Kruse was suggesting Churches just substitute grape juice (something totally not allowed for many faiths), but now he supposedly never intended for communion wine to be affected? That is contradictory to the specifics of his legislation and his own statements. Are we really going to let this guy get off the hook for such a dumb move? "

MIP's wrote on January 17, 2007 9:26 am:
" Sen. Kruse ought to be aware that a minor can be arrested for MIP by having alcohol in their system. If a minor had just been to communion and consumed wine and shortly thereafter was contacted by an officer who smelled the odor of the alcoholic beverage, a preliminary breath test could confirm the alcohol and the minor would be cited for MIP. Let's just keep the alcohol out of the minors hands until they are of legal age. I could just see the amount of court cases forthcoming from all those teens saying they had just had communion. "

Jim J wrote on January 17, 2007 9:40 am:
" We do not have ANY alcohol in our home. This is another attempt to chissle away at our freedom, get out of our homes govt and quit turning our state legislature into a dictatorship. "

1stonesongod wrote on January 17, 2007 11:00 am:
" The people of Lincoln were completly freaking out about the thought of allowing adults to drink at a Security controlled event at a park, what about allowing kids to drink???? No matter how much it is the kids will be thinking about what they are doing. Either make this a dry town or let the booze flow, I am tired of hearing arguments of stupidity from immature adults that would rather ban it then try to teach or learn about dangers and common sense, its only been around for hundreds of years, try to type in alcohol on google you might just find something! "

ditto to the poster 'whatever' wrote on January 17, 2007 11:09 am:
" Further criminalization and further impediment to a rational transition to responsible adult drinking. When we criminalize these activities we push them into the corners and once they've broken one law and found it enjoyable, it's easier to feel OK about breaking other laws. "

School House Rock wrote on January 17, 2007 11:25 am:
" Did this particular Senator ever here of a little thing called the Constitution? Its a pesky document that contains lots of obstacles for government, including infringment upon religion. Heck, that mean old Supreme Court also has allowed things like peyote and other mind altering substances in religious ceremonies. Gosh, I'm sorry this may get in the way of this Senator's attempt to revamp 2000 years of relgious tradition in various churches. "

Parent wrote on January 17, 2007 12:05 pm:
" If I wish to allow my child to consume alcohol under my supervision and within my household, that should be my perogative, not the government's. It simply overstepping the bounds of government. Same goes for religious ceremonies. This bill is poorly thought-out from the getgo. "

Brad Boyer wrote on January 17, 2007 12:22 pm:
" Can anyone point out to me when seeing if people were "paying attention" (Sen. Kruse's words) is solid legislative practice? That's the equivalent of a school-yard bully thwacking kids on the head, then saying, "Oops, sorry! Just seeing if you were awake!" Our representatives are supposed to represent us, not play silly mind-games. As a retired Methodist minister, Sen. Kruse could hardly have known better exactly what he was doing in explicitly removing only the relgious exemption (among the professional exemptions, leaving the doctors and dentists with a free hand). So why was Sen. Kruse picking on (non-teetotaling) pastors (and parents)? Are they the only ones who are responsible for the dissolution of youth? I have a hard time, having read over LB 261 word-for-word, believing that Sen. Kruse's move was merely an oversight. The proposed deletions were too obvious, not buried deep in footnoted minutiae. I applaud Sen. Kruse's pledge to not mess with the religious exemption. But I wonder if he can ever be trusted again. Rev. Brad Boyer St John & Zion Lutheran Churches Chester & Hubbell, NE "

Are you kidding me? wrote on January 17, 2007 1:31 pm:
" Seriously? This is just another example of someone trying to get government into the home. If my child wants to have a drink under my supervision in my house that I paid for with my money....that is MY choice. Again, we are not talking about sitting around letting my child become intoxicated. This is about letting my child have a sip of wine and it is a situation where you cannot allow the government to start legislating what happens in your own home. Where will it stop? "

wow wrote on January 17, 2007 5:17 pm:
" How did this guy ever get elected? Another "out of the closet clown" in the legislature. "

JJ wrote on January 17, 2007 10:31 pm:
" Is there any common sense left in our society or has eveything be taken over by the INDIVIDUALS that think they know best (government). Maybe next time it will be a law that makes it illegal to not brush your teeth for the full two times thru the birthday song. This counrty is beginning to suck REAL bad. Maybe we should ask all of the folks buried in Arlington if this is what they were fighting for. I wonder what they would say? For the love of God, some things just don't need micro-regulation. "

big D wrote on January 17, 2007 10:37 pm:
" no wonder our legislative body can't get any serious work done. they have to deal with the frivolity of bills like this and a new state song. there should be a law against this kind of nonsense. "

Hadrian wrote on January 17, 2007 10:45 pm:
" Part of the 1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Enough said. "

Who Cares? wrote on January 17, 2007 11:06 pm:
" What's the big deal? We had grape juice at communion. You privileged people love to invent problems in your lives. "

huh? wrote on January 18, 2007 5:28 am:
" I would expect a little more truth and lot more ethical behaviour from someone that claims to be a man of God. "

common sense wrote on January 18, 2007 7:31 am:
" Come on! I can see it now... 1 am on a Friday night a teen is pulled over, tests positive for alcohol, and says, "But officer, I just came from communion!" "

Hattie wrote on January 18, 2007 9:22 am:
" Good Grief Charlie Brown: Wine with communion, the Blood of Christ. Senator, go back to your hole and hide. You do not need to be dictating from the pulpit. When will common sense prevail. I grew up drinking wine at every sunday meal with all of our family. That was the way it was. It never even came close to creating any drinking problems for all of the kids in our neighborhood. In fact, we had a better understanding of what the reason was for the wine with the meal. "

Should care wrote on January 18, 2007 12:14 pm:
" I think this is what your suppose to learn in Sunday School and Church, obey your parents, which is what the Bible teaches. There was a day when the parents said no, you obeyed. Now the parents obey the kids!!! Contrary to Bibical teaching. The Bible says "unfermented" wine, that means grape juice. One again, there are those that are going to "shows" the Bible they'll do as they please. There are churches that serve both grape juice and wine, what ever you fancy. Think that is called liberal, and the attitude, who cares what the Bible or God's teaching is. Simple as that, obey the Bible's teaching or continue the path our country is now on, down!! I don't think Christ's Blood was alcholic wine!!! "

honza wrote on January 20, 2007 6:50 am:
" In heaven there is no beer, that's why we drink it here. "

AngryAl wrote on January 23, 2007 1:35 pm:
" And we wonder why our kids never learn to drink alcohol in sane amounts until they've killed off a good portion of their brain cells in college...Europe has few such problems with drinking precisely because the children learn limits and proper usage at home. Puritanical laws governing alcohol usage lead to greater numbers of alcoholics. "

Jean wrote on February 5, 2007 3:55 pm:
" So, if I let my kids sip some Christmas wine or a toast on any occation, its illegal. If this passes, we're back to the temperance movement of last century with all its stupidness. "