Now
Overcast
62°
High
73°
Low
56°

Report: Poverty is top concern for state's children

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ERIN ANDERSEN / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Jan 17, 2007 - 02:33:49 pm CST

To do right by its children and future generations, Nebraska needs to end the cycle of poverty affecting 178,000 of the state’s children, says Voices for Children in Nebraska.

Wednesday, the statewide child advocacy organization issued its 14th annual Kids Count report,  which looks at the well-being of Nebraska’s children in terms of family income, health insurance, graduation rates, dropout rates, juvenile crime, foster care, teen pregnancy and other statistical data.

“We firmly believe poverty is the underpinning of so many other problem areas,” Moore said.

Story Photo
Students pick up backpacks filled with food a spart of the Backpack Program at Everett Elementary in this September 2006 file photo. Fifty children from Everett participate in the program, which gives students food to take home for the weekend. (LJS File / Jill Peitzmeier)
What is poverty?



2006 federal poverty guidelines for number of people in a family:



1 person — $9,800 annual income

2 people — $13,200 annual income

3 people — $16,600 annual income

4 people — $20,000 annual income

5 people — $23,400 annual income

6 people — $26,800 annual income

* For each additional person add $3,400.

Minimum wage

Using the current federal minimum wage rate of $5.15 per hour, one person working full-time year round can earn $10,712. That’s $2,488 below poverty level for supporting themselves and one child.

The government considers "near poverty" at 185 percent of the poverty level, that is an annual income of $37,000 or less for a family of four.



Myths, facts on poverty

Myth: Low-income working families do not work hard.

Fact: Each parent in a low-income working family works on average 2,500 hours a year -- the equivalent of 1.2 full-time jobs.

Myth: Low-income working families are headed by single parents.

Fact: Fifty-three percent of low-income working families are headed by a married couple.

Myth: Low income working families are headed by immigrants.

Fact: Seventy-two percent of low-income working families have American-born parents only.

Myth: Low-income working families have very young parents.

Fact: Eighty-eight percent of low-income working families have parents between 25 and 54 years old.

Myth: Low-income working families are overwhelmingly minority.

Fact: Forty-seven percent of low-income working families have white, non-Hispanic parents only; 28 percent have a Hispanic parent; and 20 percent have an African-American parent.



Source: KidsCount in Nebraska 2006 and the 2006 national report: "Working Hard, Falling Short: America's Working Families and the Pursuit of Economic Security."

Twelve percent of Nebraska children live in poverty, as poverty is defined by federal guidelines.

Another 22 percent of Nebraska children live on the brink of poverty, according to Kids Count.

Children whose families live at or near poverty more often are born to mothers who lacked prenatal care. These children often are born with low birthweights, receive poor quality child care, lack adequate nutrition, live in unsafe neighborhoods, have parents who abuse alcohol or other drugs, are more prone to abuse and are more likely to drop out of school, get in trouble with the law and end up in foster care, according to Kids Count.

“Child poverty rates have been creeping up over the past five years,” said Becky Gould, director of low-income self-sufficiency programs for the Nebraska Appleseed Center.

“Although we have programs in place to help families, we are still not doing enough to really address the problem,” she said. “To move children out of poverty we have to move the whole family out of poverty."

What the state legislature and its citizens need to do is invest money up front to help families out of poverty, rather than take a reactive approach putting money into fixing the problems often exacerbated by poverty including incarceration, untreated mental illness, dropouts, teen pregnancy and unhealthy babies.

Among the steps being proposed by both Voices for Children and Nebraska Appleseed are:

* Increasing minimum wage from $5.15 an hour.

“That would have a very direct effect particularly in Nebraska where so many of our jobs are retail, fast food and seasonal part-time jobs with hourly rates,” Moore said. “When you raise minimum wage you are raising the earning power of those people in particular.”

* Strengthening work support programs that allow families to continue receiving government assistance benefits as they work toward self-sufficiency.

* Expanding eligibility for the child care subsidy program. Right now the state provides the subsidy for families at 120 percent or below the federal poverty guideline (or $24,000 for a family of four).

Prior to budget cuts in 2002, the subsidy was offered to families earning 185 percent of the poverty rate or lower ($37,000). Using child care rates at Lincoln’s YWCA a family spend $6,500 a year on child care for a toddler, and $5,720 a year for a pre-schooler — or one-quarter to one-third of their annual income just for child care.

Senator Amanda McGill has introduced a bill to expand bring the subsidy up to 185 percent.

* Expand the Nebraska earned income tax credit from it current rate of 8 percent. Some states offer has high as 20 percent of the federal earned income tax credit which is designed to help low and moderate-income families retain more of their incomes.

“It (earned income tax credit) has been found to be one of the most effective anti-poverty strategies. It puts money in families’ pockets in March and April when they have high utility bills and need that money,” Moore said. “It has been found to be the source that puts the money most quickly and directly back into the economy, as they pay bills and buy clothes for their kids.”

Simply put if a family gets $100 back in federal earned income tax credits, they now receive $8 back from the state in earned income tax credits.

Moore contends that Nebraska would be better off using this year’s budget surplus to expand public assistance programs.

“Instead of taking tax cuts in amounts that will not change the day-to-day living of people in Nebraska,” she said.

Reach Erin Andersen at 473-7217 or eandersen@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
LD wrote on January 17, 2007 5:20 pm:
" Well, I just can't imagine how so many children are victims of poverty. Just a few months ago, the state of Nebraska was sooooo proud because they had just paid out their 1 Billionth dollar of child support. Huh. OH!!! Wait!!! The money doesn't go to th kids...the money is for mommy!! OK, now it makes sense! "

1/3 wrote on January 17, 2007 6:04 pm:
" 1/3 of our children in poverty or the brink of poverty? Sorry, hard to believe. I know that makes me a bad person who must not pay enough in taxes even though about half of my gross goes to taxes of some sort. You know, some people make money off these kind of reports and some people can hide income so they look poor and don't have to pay taxes. The earned income credit is not a tax or lack of a tax. It is a form of income from the taxpayers. People who get earned income credits pay little or no taxes. No matter how much we pay in taxes, donate, and add new programs: it is never enough. Just like the war in Iraq, we aren't winning the war on poverty so I guess just like the war in Iraq we should give up. "

LeRoy wrote on January 18, 2007 7:11 am:
" Your lack of compassion will be judged someday........... "

LeRoy wrote on January 18, 2007 7:25 am:
" The lack of compassion and selfishness of many Nebraskan's amazes me.........we will all be judged by our deeds and lack of deeds someday..... "

CC wrote on January 18, 2007 8:26 am:
" what do you mean the money is for mommy. I recived child support for my 5 year old, and all that money goes to her care. Weather it be clothes, daycare, food, a roof over her head, or gas to get to her activities. All the money goes to her. And how dare you say otherwise. I know that there are lots of moms who use it for other things, but please don't group up all together. Also my daughter comes home from kindegarden and she talks about her friends who don't have a home or food. Also when I go to her school for lunch I can tell the kids who come from poverty. Don't judge, for ye be judged in the end. "

Hemet wrote on January 18, 2007 1:33 pm:
" I have always thought that poverty was prevailent in Lincoln because of our endless recession economy. I doubt if most of the subsidies, tax cuts, raise of minimum wage are anything but rearrangement of chairs on the Titanic. A re-thinking of the economy is necessary. Instead of begging outside manufacturers to come here this town should look at creative ways to take advantage of the Ethanol boom going on and the corn demand. As usual, it all seems to be happeniing in Omaha. Are our "leaders" just lazy or are they confused? What ever happened with our technology incubator? With the cheap labor available here why can't some smart entrepunear start a tech company that hires low cost professionals to do the work that would cost 10 times as much in California. Come to think of it, the Universities in California contribute big-time to the start of new companies their. what is the U of N doing? Not much. "

Barbara McCall wrote on January 19, 2007 12:02 pm:
" Poverty is a very real problem in Nebraska. If you know of an individual or family living in Lincoln, Nebraska, with income at or below 140% of the Federal Poverty Level, please send them to the People's City Mission Distribution Center at 21st and N Streets. We distribute food, clothing, personal care items and furniture, free of charge, to individuals and families in need. "