Now
Overcast
54°
High
66°
Low
43°

State looks at calls during congressional race

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NATE JENKINS / The Associated Press

Friday, Dec 22, 2006 - 09:54:46 am CST

The Nebraska Public Service Commission is investigating allegations about automated phone calls targeting former congressional candidate Scott Kleeb during the last days of the campaign.

The investigation ultimately could lead to allegations that federal laws were broken.

Kleeb, a Democratic ranch hand, lost to Republican state Sen. Adrian Smith in the race for the 3rd District seat.

Story Photo
Scott Kleeb

Kleeb’s offices were flooded in the final days of the race with complaints from people upset about receiving repeated, automated phone calls with poor-quality recordings of Kleeb’s voice.

Kleeb and his supporters believe that someone recorded a legitimate automated call of Kleeb’s targeting voters and then used it to flood some homes with dozens of calls. The theory is that such a flood of calls would anger the recipient and steer them away from voting for Kleeb or casting a ballot at all.

“Based on the calls we got in our office from people saying they were not going to vote, did it influence the election? Absolutely,” Kleeb said.

The PSC requires that people who use so-called autodialers get permits, make calls only during certain hours of the day and clearly identify the source of the calls.

In a tape recording of one of the calls obtained by the PSC, where Kleeb’s voice is heard, the source is not identified, according to an official involved in the investigation.

“If it’s intentional, it looks bad,” said Gene Hand, director of telecommunications for the PSC.

Derek Brown of Kearney said he received about a half-dozen calls with Kleeb’s voice throughout the course of a Saturday just before the election. The first call came at about 7 a.m. and he did not recall sources of the calls being identified.

“It was like I was getting yelled at,” Brown said of the recordings. “I wasn’t going to vote either way, but I thought it was really annoying.”

The PSC is trying to track down the source of the calls. Fines could be levied if it is found that rules were broken.

Victor Covalt III, an attorney working for the state Democratic Party on the issue, said the findings of the PSC investigation could lead to legal action, including a complaint that the calls violated a Federal Communications Commission rule that says automated calls must identify their source at the beginning of the message.

Depending on the results of the investigation, he may also complain that the calls violated a state law against deceptive trade.

“We’re serious about it, and we’re serious about elections being honest,” Covalt said. “If behavior like this is not illegal, it should become illegal.”

Smith said his campaign did not place automated calls using Kleeb’s voice and is not ruling out the possibility the calls were placed because of a technical malfunction caused by a vendor used by Kleeb.

“I hope they get to the bottom of it,” said Smith, a Republican.

Hand also said it’s possible the calls were caused by technical problems.

But Hand said one troublesome aspect of the case is that it appears people such as Brown received a barrage of the poor-quality recorded messages.

“It looks like they called people time after time after time,” Hand said.

The National Republican Congressional Committee used automated calls in at least 53 competitive House races nationwide, and campaign reports show the NRCC helped pay for phone banks used in the Smith-Kleeb race. According to Federal Election Commission filings, the NRCC paid a Florida firm nearly $3,500 for phone banks to oppose Kleeb, but it is unclear whether the money helped pay for the calls that spurred the complaints to the PSC.

Kleeb did not file a complaint with the PSC, nor did his campaign. He said phone calls from people complaining about the automated calls overwhelmed a Hastings campaign office and forced the campaign to stop placing its own calls in the final days of the campaign.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Ban them wrote on December 22, 2006 6:05 am:
" Easy solution to this stupid problem. Ban the use of automated calling devices...........for any purpose! "

Skeptical wrote on December 22, 2006 8:17 am:
" I've seen it before. Sure, Smith didn't pay for the automated calls but one of his political operatives talk to a friend of a friend and someone made it happen. That way Smith can deny it and have no legal repercussions. It happens all the time. "

tim wrote on December 22, 2006 9:21 am:
" everytime a democrate losses and election they file a lawsuite or call for an investigation. sour grapes from a party that's totally out of touch with the people. "

Sour policies wrote on December 22, 2006 10:07 am:
" This isn't sour grapes--it's a legitimate issue. Maybe during the next election a recorded "Newt Gingrich" can call tim about 300 times a day. "

Loser wrote on December 22, 2006 10:16 am:
" Kleeb's dem cronies are sore losers. Hey, your candidate didn't win, get over it. You did take over the house and senate anyway, so rejoice, we'll all have more bureacracy. "

Sick and Tired wrote on December 22, 2006 11:17 am:
" Why is it that every time a Democrat loses someone broke the rules. Take the loss and go about your business. "

lost touch? wrote on December 22, 2006 11:52 am:
" I have more in common with Demacrats than I do republicans. I don't hate everyone who is different. I'm by no means rich or even middle class. I am getting poorer because of the republicans. "

Different vintage wrote on December 22, 2006 11:54 am:
" Sour Grapes is right. Filing a lawsuit or calling for an investigation is no way to win an election. Everyone knows the way to prevail in American democracy is to have your family buy your brother the governorship of a populous state with a sizable number of electoral votes. Then you have your brother and his friend the Secretary of State skew the voting and stop counting while you are ahead. Then you run to the conservative-laden Supreme Court to have this process given the rubber stamp of approval. That way, you don’t need a majority of the popular vote to drive the country into debt, make a shambles of anything remotely requiring a competent foreign policy, and drive gas prices through the roof to your Texas oil buddies can post record profits. That’s the American way! "

bj wrote on December 22, 2006 1:27 pm:
" I wish these groups would adhere to the Do not call list. Some of us put our phone numbers on there for a reason then we got these annoyance calls that fill our phone voice mail to the point we can not receive messages for things we actually want or need to hear about. "

Actual 3rd District resident wrote on December 22, 2006 5:09 pm:
" Yes, Kleeb is a Democrat. No, he is not a ranch hand. Right after the election, Kleeb was asked what he planned to do since he lost the election. His answer was that he would have to find a job. If he were really a ranch hand in Dunning, he would not have to find a job. And if he really were a ranch hand, he would be a Democrat ranch hand, not a "Democratic" ranch hand. It appears that the PSC really has nothing to do to accomplish the investigation. It appears to have already been settled by the news reporter. "

Julia wrote on December 22, 2006 6:01 pm:
" When Osborn was running I spoke to real people three times and asked not to be called again. They all promised to take me off of their list. They all lied. I got nine calls from the Osborn campaign. I voted against him. "

Scott wrote on December 22, 2006 10:12 pm:
" Right...it's the Dems who complain when there is an election loss. I seem to remember a campaign in 2000 where a certain G.W. Bush lost the election and was bailed out by his brother in Florida (along with Katherine Harris and the Supreme Court)...or maybe it was all a nightmare. "

Zoomie wrote on December 26, 2006 1:47 pm:
" So I guess you guys don't care about Federal law violations? FEC requires all such calls START with an identification of who made the call. These calls NEVER identify who made them. And its a good bet to blame the GOP, since they have been caught doing this exact thing in at least 20 states last November (in fact, in Indiana, where its a crime to make robocalls, they are facing potentially MILLIONS in fines for making robocalls)! There is no record of the Democratic Party using the same tactic, ever. So, yes, it is only the GOP and they are breaking rules every chance they get! "

Chris wrote on December 26, 2006 4:07 pm:
" Automated calls should be banned by Nebraska election law, since they have been abused (and will be again). The straw that breaks the camel's back is they're not not originating in Nebraska. "