Now
Fair
64.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

Readers respond to 'Oughta Be A Law'

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Dec 18, 2006 - 12:14:02 am CST

How many times have you heard a disgruntled friend say, “There oughta be a law,” when confronted with a frustrating dilemma. For a couple of months the Journal Star has been collecting ideas from readers for new laws.

Now, we pass on those ideas to readers and state senators, including the 22 brand-new senators who will stepping into office for the first time.

In less than three weeks, the state’s 49 state senators will begin their six-month session. And during the first 10 days they will introduce new bill ideas.

Nebraskans have plenty of ideas for new laws, touching areas from driving to garage sales.

And we don’t always agree with each other on what the best solution for a problem would be.

During their longer, six-month session, senators generally introduce between 800 and 900 bills and pass about 250.

Many bills fail to run the entire legislative gamut, never becoming law because there isn’t enough time, because they face opposition or because they are not needed.

Two years ago, the Journal Star solicited ideas for new laws and followed two of them through the Legislature.

One (we called it the Hallam bill) would have provided some property tax relief on homes destroyed by a natural disaster. The other (dubbed the Lorelee Byrd bill, after the former state treasurer) would have required statewide elected officials, such as the governor and treasurer, to follow personnel rules created by the Legislature. It was proposed as a constitutional amendment.

Both bills were quietly controversial. The Hallam bill would have cost the state money, sending revenue to local subdivisions for the lost tax revenue.

Other constitutional officers quietly opposed the Byrd bill because it also would have limited their power to hire and fire.

Neither bill made it out of committee.

This year we’re simply offering the ideas readers have given us.

If senators decide to tackle any of the ideas, we’ll let you know.

Here are the ideas:

Outlaw ticket scalping: I feel there should be a law against “scalping” tickets to sporting events, concerts, etc. If people have tickets but cannot go, they should sell them for face value or less. The people who profit from this are crooks, in my mind. A few years ago a scalper was pressuring a young boy to sell him his ticket to a Nebraska football game. I conferred with law enforcement officers outside the stadium and they said there was nothing they could do.

Vote outside party affiliation: Registered voters should have the freedom to vote their choices, regardless of party affiliation, in the primary election. Restricting voters to a party affiliation is actually denying the voters the right to vote for who they believe is the best candidate for the office.

Post food allergens: I hope to get a law passed in Nebraska and eventually across our fine nation that all eating establishments (restaurants, delis, vendors at all events, cafeterias and anywhere food is served to the public) must post a full and updated sign regarding what food allergens are contained in their food or may have been processed with their food.

The information should be available at eating establishments and on their Web sites. They also should make employees aware of what allergens they are serving in their food.

I have a 5-year-old who has a severe peanut allergy, and many times when we ask if there are any sort of peanut products at their establishment or if any of their food is processed with peanuts, we are told, “ I don’t know” or “I don’t think so.”

That’s not good enough. We need to know for sure so we can sit down and enjoy our meal without having to worry about him having a severe reaction that would require a dose of EpiPen and a trip to the emergency room or worse.

We are limited to a handful of restaurants we know are safe.

Let’s make this country a little more safe for these children diagnosed with food allergies, or at least begin with our own state of Nebraska in hopes others will follow.

Raise the minimum wage: I look at the minimum wage being a pathetic $5.15 per hour and look at the cost of living being much higher. Something really needs to be done about it. We need a proposal to increase the minimum wage.

Move the State Fair: The Nebraska State Fair should be in the middle of the state, not on one edge. In other words, give Kearney or Grand Island a chance and have Lincoln and Omaha do the driving for once.

Add tax advantage to cars sold privately: How about a law that removes some of the price advantage on trade-in vehicles from car dealers? Currently if you sell your vehicle privately and then buy another one, you pay sales tax on the total purchase price.

If you trade in your vehicle on another, you pay sales tax only on the trade difference. On a $10,000 trade-in, the sales tax difference is about $700.

So how about a law that allows you to count the private sale of your vehicle (within 30 days either side of the purchase of another vehicle, as you have 30 days to license the new vehicle) as the equivalent of a trade-in for sales tax purposes?

The law could set the requirements, such as a notarized bill of sale, for such a transaction to be valid.

Wipers on, lights on: My suggestion for a new law is that it be mandatory when driving in the rain that you have your lights on! Several states have wipers on, lights on laws. California and Florida are two of them.

Protect landowners from trespassers suing: My husband and I own an acreage in Pawnee County. When renewing our liability/property insurance last year, our insurance agent suggested we buy umbrella coverage because we would be liable for personal injury should a hunter trespass and get hurt while on the property.

This is crazy! Why should a landowner be responsible for a person’s injury if he or she is on your property without permission.

It is my understanding that Kansas has already passed a law protecting landowners. I think Nebraska should pass one, too.

Keep track of guilty party in small-claims judgments: I won a small-claims case, but now I am having a difficult time collecting the money owed me. I have to take the guilty person back to court to find out where he lives, what assets he has and where he works before I can file liens or garnishee wages.

Part of the law should be that when a judgment is made, the guilty party should have to provide that information when the verdict is handed down.

Advertise the before-rebate price: Everybody I know despises the use of mail-in rebates — and especially when the after-rebate price is used as the main price in the ad, as it usually is.

I would like to see requirements regarding mail-in rebates, including not allowing companies to limit their rebates to one per address.

It should also be illegal for any company to sell or otherwise share personal information given on rebate applications.

Stop early and last-minute over-the-air campaigning: There should be a law forbidding any over-the-air (television, radio, satellite, etc.) campaigning for a statewide office until 120 days before primary election day and 90 days before the general election.

Candidates could buy as much print ad space as they desire. There would be no limit on fliers, brochures sent through the mail, door-to-door campaigning or outdoor signage.

In addition, there would be no over-the-air campaigning for 72 hours prior to election days.

Candidates would be welcome to buy all the air time they can afford on election days.

Reason: Give us a break!

Allow votes from outside city on city issues: Allow residents who live within one mile or three miles of a village or city to vote on that city’s election issues. They must live by the codes and laws mandated by the city, and they should have the opportunity to have a say in the way the city is run.

Make changes in child support laws: The courts need to recognize that fathers (and mothers who have shared custody) also pay for things like clothes, food, medication, etc., when children are at their house. All that is taken into consideration is how much the noncustodial parent makes.

The parent receiving child support should have to keep track (receipts, credit card, etc.) of what he or she spends the money on and after a certain amount of time adjust child support to that.

They also need to look at debt, so that the person paying does not go into worse debt and then looks like a deadbeat when he or she cannot pay.

Don’t require legal notices in newspapers: There should be a law that removes the requirement that public notices be printed several times in a newspaper of general circulation.

In this day and age, with the technology of the Internet widely available, it makes sense that state, county and local Web sites could be expanded to include a section devoted to the publication of any public notice.

Power companies should offer discounts: There should be a law requiring municipal and retail public power companies to provide steep discounts to schools, libraries and hospitals for their usage of electrical service.

State needs a safe haven law: I was watching “The Oprah Winfrey Show,” which stated that Nebraska, Hawaii and Alaska are the only states that do not have safe haven laws. Safe haven laws enable mothers to take babies to hospitals, fire stations, police stations, etc., and leave them in the care of the state, with no questions asked.

Extend health-care coverage on children: Health-care costs are a concern for all of us, and yet there is a large group of uninsured or Medicaid-covered individuals in the 19-25 age group. Typical family policies drop children at 19 unless they are full-time students.

Some people cannot handle a full class load for many reasons, including academic ability, the need to work to pay tuition or other responsibilities to the family.

Other states have taken the lead and required employers to cover children to age 25 without regard to their student status. This helps reduce the number of uninsured and Medicaid-covered individuals while giving them time to establish education and a work history until they can secure their own health-care benefits.

Reform petition initiative process: After watching the spate of petition-driven constitutional amendments and other signature-driven ballot initiatives in recent years, it has occurred to me that the entire petition process is tremendously one-sided and heavily biased toward the initiating side.

In addition to this, it is becoming increasingly obvious that outside interests with large coffers of money are using this process to further their agendas. The petition process should be an avenue for the affected citizens to promote change and not a means for other entities to sidestep established legislative and judicial procedures.

I would propose that only volunteer (unpaid) registered voters be allowed to gather signatures. They would only be allowed to gather signatures within the boundaries of their precinct.

The petition itself must have the full, legal wording of the initiative clearly visible in a type size no smaller than 12 points.

There will be two clearly marked signature options: one for and one against, which would be used to determine whether an issue would go on the ballot.

Don’t burden taxpayer to provide proof: The Nebraska Department of Revenue should not be able to assess penalties or interest to a taxpayer who in good faith paid a vendor (with nexus in Nebraska) and an error is later discovered through an audit.

Now, when the Revenue Department audits business taxpayers for sales and use tax, it puts the entire burden on the taxpayer under audit to prove the proper sales tax was collected by every vendor with which he or she did business.

Control premiums on high-risk health insurance: I would like to see the Legislature revise statutes that force the Comprehensive Health Insurance Pool Board to raise premiums dramatically. This year the average increase was 25 percent on this program for Nebraskans who can’t get health insurance anywhere else. Premiums for my actual plan based on my age and gender rose 40 percent in 2006.

Tenants should have to pay meth lab cleanup bill: If a person is renting a home and has a meth lab in the house, the tenant should be held responsible for all cleanup and repair costs.

No property owner should have to pay for damages caused by tenants and their drug use.

Limit number of people who serve on multiple boards: There needs to be a limited number of village board members who are on other village entities such as fire department, rescue and water boards. When the village board is loaded with fire department members, for instance, there is no fair vote to others involved in the village. They monopolize the vote for their own agenda.

No plea bargains for meth users: There needs to be a law that there are no plea bargains for people who use or make methamphetamines. The ads on television say Nebraska is tough on meth labs, but authorities make plea bargains every day and let drug users back onto the street. If Nebraska says it is tough, it should follow up on its word.

Vehicle lights on all the time or pay high fines: All drivers on any road in Nebraska should be required to have their headlights turned on regardless of the time of day. In other words, when you turn the key to start your vehicle, the headlights must be turned on.

 There are way too many accidents caused by unconcerned drivers who drive in fog, misting rain, snow, clouds without turning on any headlights.

There should also be high fines. For first offense, $200; $500 for second; $1,000 for third offense.

When you hit a person in the pocketbook, they will abide, or they will have to pay.

Allow public policing of handicapped parking spots: Allow concerned residents to call in license numbers of vehicles illegally parked in handicapped slots and allow police to issue citations to the offenders based on this information. Too often, offenders have left by the time police get there.

No cell phones while driving: Outlaw the use of a cell phone while driving. We have had numerous close calls involving drivers talking on cell phones. 

Offer health benefits to longtime state employees: Nebraska should join 47 other states and offer a health insurance benefit to their state employees who are retiring with 25-plus years of service.

No driving until 18: Raise the age for getting a driver’s license to 18.

Get rid of downtown bike lanes: I think the bike lanes downtown are dangerous. Not only do they make drivers nervous, but the bikers themselves think they don’t have to obey speeding laws, traffic lights or or any other laws that apply.

How many bikers are going to get seriously injured or killed before they decide just how stupid that idea was in the beginning?

Require 911 callers to stick around the scene: I am a firefighter/paramedic for Lincoln. I also often interact with police, sheriff, state patrol and numerous volunteer agencies in the area.

I feel there ought to be a law that if you feel the need to call 911 you should stay in the area until someone from a responding agency can make personal contact with you.

People do not have to get out and render aid or approach a “scene” if they don’t want to. They can just stay in the area until someone from a responding agency makes contact with them.

I feel this would make for a more legitimate use of the 911 system.

W-2s due by Dec. 31: There oughta be a law that all employers must have W-2 forms to their employees by Dec. 31 every year.

I’m one of those who likes to get their tax refund as soon as possible, and it drives me crazy to have to wait until the middle of January or beginning of February to get my W-2.

No doggies on lap: I would like to see a law outlawing operating a motor vehicle with a pet in your lap. I see this all the time, and it has to be distracting.

Limit election advertising, spending: Allow election advertisements only in the 60 days before an election. The money spent should not exceed the yearly salary for the elected job.

Ban concurrent sentences: There ought to be a law against judges sentencing people to concurrent sentences. What is the point of even taking someone through the whole legal process if they aren’t going to have a sentence to serve?

No bicycles on roads without paved shoulders: There ought to be a law to prohibit or outlaw bicyclists from using two-lane paved roads that do not have paved shoulders.

I live out near Denton and several bicyclists use West Denton Road, which does not have a paved shoulder. This is dangerous not only to the riders but also to the motor vehicle drivers, as most times the cyclists do not ride single file but side by side on this hilly road.

Stiffer penalties against child predators: There oughta be a law protecting our children from being abused, misguided or taken advantage of by people of trust.

Should it only be a misdemeanor crime, when our teachers, counselors, group leaders, faith leaders (people of trust) begin a sexual relationship with one of our children when they are 16, 17, 18?

These relationships happen more often than people think and are sometimes hidden by the employer of the adult.  

Always allow right turns on red: Prohibiting right turns on red by placing signs or other traffic control devices is becoming so common the benefits of a right turn on red are all but lost in many areas.

The use of electronically controlled signals that prohibit right turns at various times and allow them at others are expensive and seldom function with any degree of logic.

We should add or amend state law to make right turns on red legal at all times, at all intersections, providing the original restrictions are followed (complete stop and yielding to other traffic and pedestrians).

Need ‘Clean Election’ reform: I would like to see the Legislature implement a “Clean Election” reform law.

Clean elections laws provide voluntary public financing of elections. These laws reduce the influence of powerful lobbies and rich individuals and make running for office a possibility for a much larger segment of the public.

These laws encourage discourse and grass-roots campaigning by making money a less important part of the election process.

Exempt military retirees from taxes: I recommend a law where military retirees are tax-exempt, so we can have our full military retirement. I earned mine by serving 22 years in other countries, war zones and other states, but now that I’m retired I must pay Nebraska taxes on it. Fair it is not.

Require licensing to run for office: I would like to see a law that would require all politicians to obtain a license to run for an elected office and maintain that license while in office. Politicians should have to pay a yearly maintenance fee, with the money used for a scholarship fund or other charitable purpose. We could also require such qualifications as testing.

Lower tax burden for seniors: Nebraska needs some new law helping seniors with our taxes, so when we retire we are able to stay in Nebraska instead of leaving for a more tax-friendly state.

Impound uninsured drivers’ cars: Having recently been involved in an auto accident with an uninsured driver, I would like to see new legislation that would be proactive regarding proof of financial responsibility.

I would like to see legislation that if you allow your registration and/or insurance to lapse, you would have a seven-day grace period following the expiration date, after which the vehicle is subject to impoundment.

Outlaw smoking in cars with children: I strongly believe smoking in cars where children younger than 18 are present should be outlawed.

No lobbyists near senators: Bar any special-interest group or lobbyist from within 100 feet of a state senator. And any state senator who takes money would end up in jail and lose his or her seat.

Audit state budget: Require an out-of-state accounting firm to audit the state budget. Let the people of Nebraska see any pork or fat.

Election ads 30 days out: There should be a law limiting the time candidates for office can pollute the television airwaves with political ads. I think 30 days before an election is plenty long.

Sell beer in smaller quantities: We need to combat the binge drinking problem. Most establishments serving beer on tap offer only large mugs holding 14 to 16 ounces or more. Such an amount when consumed by a person of low body weight leads to rapid intoxication. Many people would prefer 8 to 10 ounces, but servers say these are not available. I propose a law to require beer-on-tap be offered in smaller quantities than we now see.

Abolish the death penalty.

Offer driver’s ed in schools: We need to put driver’s education (with defensive driving) back in the schools. The 50-hour law (requiring teens to log 50 hours with an adult driver in the passenger seat) is a comedy of errors. No parent should be teaching his or her child to drive.

Force vehicle inspections: We need to reinstate the vehicle inspection law. Many car and truck headlights are out of adjustment. Taillights are out. Turn signals are out. It is terrible.

Review all laws: How about making a critical review of all laws on the books? Those that are weak, not being enforced or obsolete should be dropped.

Fingerprint discarded beer bottles: Most of the beer-bottle litter on city streets is from people drinking and driving. Have police dust the beer bottles littering the streets for fingerprints and start arresting people who have thrown them out.

Make candidates comply with no-call lists: Make it against the law for electoral candidates to call people registered on national no-call lists.

Give parents school vouchers: There is more and more information on immorality being fed to children in public schools. Give parents school vouchers that could be used for public or private schools. Children would be required to take a state standardized test to verify that each is receiving an adequate education for the money spent.

Make everyone speak English: All immigrants should have to learn the English language, including school-age individuals. And anyone applying for a job or inquiring about renting property should have to have an interpreter if he or she is not fluent in English.

Help college students financially: Create a scholarship program like the Georgia HOPE Scholarship program, which stands for Helping Outstanding Pupils Educationally and rewards students with financial assistance at eligible Georgia public and private colleges and universities and public technical colleges.

Ban discrimination: There should be a law that people cannot discriminate against people they think are gay when they aren’t.

Gather DNA on all criminals: Require everyone convicted of a felony and any person currently incarcerated in any penal facility in the state, including juvenile detention centers, to submit to a DNA test, and have the information entered into the national DNA database.

Enact political spending limit: Politicians should have a $100,000 spending limit for the primary and $100,000 for the November election. We the people don’t need the mudslinging that goes on. We just need to hear what they are going to do.

Require garage sale signs to be taken down: Garage sale signs should be taken down a day after the sale, or the offender should be fined.

Make sure laws are equal: Enforce the laws we have equally. For example, mufflers are required and enforced on all vehicles except trucks and motorcycles.

Immigration laws vary by country and by nationality.

The USDA had beginning-farmer loans for socially disadvantaged people. Everyone qualified except for the white male.

Ban cell phones in public: Cell phones should be outlawed in all public places and while driving cars. They distract people, even at hockey games.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Kiki wrote on December 18, 2006 1:35 am:
" Good Lord! Some of these ideas are so idiotic, I suggest we make a law making it harder to make new laws. Smaller glasses of beer? Are you kidding me? Outlaw scalping? Why? If someone buys the ticket, they have the right to sell it for what it's worth. Ban cell phones in public because they distract you at a hockey game? How about we ban hockey, or maybe just mullets. "

Mycroft wrote on December 18, 2006 1:48 am:
" There are some good ideas here. Still I wonder, do we need more laws. I would like to propose a 3-for-1 Law. For every new law, ordinance, regulation enacted, 3 existing laws, ordinances, regulations of equal level should be repealed. We are over burdened by the government and the police "it's the law" state. Our government thinks it exists to impose new laws upon us. Citizens buy into this idea until they find themselves in trouble as they ultimately will. IT'S THE LAW!!! We have to many laws and many are poorly thought out. In so many cases we just need to get along and for that we don't need laws, police with guns (doing jobs they don't want to do), and worthless lawyers making these laws and making money off them. 3 for 1. At the start it will be easy to find stupid laws to get rid of. Eventually, some quality of life, whose really responsible, how much do we need this decisions will have to be made. The answer to every problem is not a new law and relegating a new group of citizens to members of the criminal classes. “It’s The Law” sounds good until someone finds a new way to apply it, inflexibly, to you. Then it’s just a bad idea. And you, previously a good citizen, are now a criminal. "

Jeff wrote on December 18, 2006 1:52 am:
" We already have too many laws. Nebraska is a Republican state. Repulicans normally are thought of to want less government....less laws. Democracy and freedom are limited by too many restrictive laws. "

Outlaw religion wrote on December 18, 2006 4:31 am:
" Save the human race. Make illegal the beleif in imaginary beings in the sky. "

nitemare wrote on December 18, 2006 5:50 am:
" Ban cell phone use in public. Hmmm... Doesn't make any sense. None at all. It would be like banning guns. Guns don't kill people. PEOPLE kill people. Cell phones don't disrupt things. It's the peoples phone habits that disrupt things. NOT the cell phones. It's all etiquette. WAKE UP. "

Justin, wrote on December 18, 2006 5:56 am:
" I'm impressed! Almost ALL these suggestions have at least SOME merit, and some I expect will actually be introduced in some form. Unfortunately, a lot just aren't practical. I'm sorry, but we're not going to be able to put the cell-phone genii back in the bottle. We have to pay for the convenience of them with a little annoyance at times. Too many people are allergic to too many things to put the burden of posting them all on restaurants. My father, for example, was DEATHLY allergic to eggs, to the point that as children, we accidentally put him in the hospital blowing the insides out of eggs for easter. The fumes in the air were enough. He took resposibility for seeing that he didn't eat anything containing eggs. If a restaurant didn't know, he didn't risk it. As far as child support goes, I recognize the fact that my child support goes into the pool with the rest of my ex wife's money, and that when she buys gas, pays a utility bill, a credit card bill, or makes a house payment, my children benefit as much as they do when she buys them clothes, or pizza, or takes them to a movie. Expecting her to keep track of receipts, and then expecting someone else to keep track of HER keeping track of receipts....well, imagine the avalanch of paperwork! Leave it alone, it's working MUCH better now than it used to. I'd be afraid to mess with it now. "

Dick wrote on December 18, 2006 6:55 am:
" Some of these are good. But some are just kind of a little stiff. If you want to get that tight on stuff just because you don't like it, go to Russia and try to get the USSR back up in running. "

Mike wrote on December 18, 2006 7:18 am:
" I wish I knew about this submission. I would have liked to give a few of my ideas. One specifically, the city ban of alcohol sale on Sundays before noon seems to me to be unconstitutional. It is about seperation of church and state and if someone wants to buy liquor or beer on the so called "God's day" we have that right. This needs to be lifted. "

Great Idea wrote on December 18, 2006 7:43 am:
" Looks like a list of give me everything for free, remove any responsability, protect me from my own self even if I don't ask you to laws to jack up the cost of living complaints and wish lists "

connie wrote on December 18, 2006 8:10 am:
" Many, maybe even most, of these are good suggestions, although some, while good ideas, are just not practical. I think the most important is the lack of a 'safe-haven' law in this state. This is a TERRIBLR oversight on the part of our legislature, and I hope to see it addressed. Also, to the (obvious) man who wants to make child support a bureaucratic nightmare...just pay your child support and stop whining! It, rightly, comes before all your other obligations! "

Roger wrote on December 18, 2006 8:18 am:
" Wow, a lot of people have too much time on their hands! Some of this stuff is pretty funny, thanks for the laugh! "

Don't let the gov't control your life wrote on December 18, 2006 8:29 am:
" Something that is a little nuisance to you does not need to be a law for everyone. If you want to let the government control your life we could create a little zone out in the middle of the state where no one wants to live anyway. Don't you think the police have better things to do than fingerprint trash or give out tickets for not taking down a garage sale sign? How petty are you? A lot of the proposed laws are really things that people should take care of themselves. You don't need or actually want the government dictating your daily functions. "

Small claims judgment wrote on December 18, 2006 8:37 am:
" Good idea, but many people don't show up to court, so even if it is required to state assets at time of judgment, it will be impossible if a no-show. "

hmmm.. wrote on December 18, 2006 8:44 am:
" Ban discrimination against gays when they aren't? What about when they are indeed gay? Hypocrite! It has to go both ways not just one way. "

Tim wrote on December 18, 2006 9:01 am:
" Thank God our founders set up a system where everyone with a complaint can't enact a law. A system for the majority, not the minority (this in no way refers to race, only opinion). "

Tom wrote on December 18, 2006 10:06 am:
" Maybe we need a law to require people to read the constitution. Seems like about half of these laws would be unconstitutional. "

H wrote on December 18, 2006 10:37 am:
" Every Fire department has a "Safe House" sign outside. It's already in play. "

Lincoln Has become Whiners.. wrote on December 18, 2006 10:53 am:
" Ok so now I'm completely convinced that the American citizens have nothing better to do with their time than to complain. When did the people of this country become a bunch of sniveling Wussies? Banning Cell phones in public, don't let people's dogs sit on their lap when Driving, Outlaw smoking while there are Children in the car, Vehicle lights on all the time, ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALITY (I see more taxes to keep murders alive in my future) ....COME ON LINCOLN! It takes Maybe .50 cents to reload a shotgun shell to exicute these people but ever wonder how much you have to pay in taxes to keep those on Death row alive? I've know Murderers, and I've know the Victim. Eye for an Eye! And I don't even want to hear about Capital punishment being Cruel and unusual punishment! Raping and murdering someone is Cruel and Unusual punishment....The Electric chair is a trip to hawaii compaired to what the Murderer did in most cases! If I was president I would tattoo "Child Molester" on the Forehead of Everyone that commits the crime. Let them see how the humiliation for the rest of their life feels. "

Mike wrote on December 18, 2006 11:04 am:
" Wow. Some people have way to much time on their hands.... How about a law that says you have to have an IQ over 80 to vote or initiate new laws. "

A wrote on December 18, 2006 11:39 am:
" You may want to check your research on the costs of the death penalty. "In its review of death penalty expenses, the State of Kansas concluded that capital cases are 70% more expensive than comparable non-death penalty cases. The study counted death penalty case costs through to execution and found that the median death penalty case costs $1.26 million. Non-death penalty cases were counted through to the end of incarceration and were found to have a median cost of $740,000. For death penalty cases, the pre-trial and trial level expenses were the most expensive part, 49% of the total cost. The costs of appeals were 29% of the total expense, and the incarceration and execution costs accounted for the remaining 22%." "

steve wrote on December 18, 2006 11:53 am:
" I think I would increase that IQ requirement to about 110. "

donnie wrote on December 18, 2006 12:07 pm:
" They need to require civics class in school where one would learn that the U.S. is a form of liberal democracy called a constitution republic. In such a system, majority rule is tempered by minority rights protected by law. "

You have got to be kidding... wrote on December 18, 2006 12:21 pm:
" "No parent should be teaching his or her child to drive." What the?? In other words, you want no responsibility to teach your children? I agree, let's put Driver's Ed back in schools, however, it's still your responsibility to teach your child on any given number of subjects. I guess I wouldn't expect my daughter to learn about "womanly things" from the school nurse. Grow up and get responsible! "

C wrote on December 18, 2006 12:28 pm:
" Safe house is not the same as the Safe Haven. Sounds similar, not at all the same thing. "

John wrote on December 18, 2006 12:48 pm:
" Make tax decreases as easy to get on the ballot as tax increase. "

chode wrote on December 18, 2006 1:35 pm:
" That school voucher law needs some serious consideration. If the legislature is going to force consolidation onto schools, then they should at least allow vouchers to provide for school choice. "

John wrote on December 18, 2006 2:00 pm:
" First of all I think that the phrase, There oughta be a law, was in a joking reference! Much like most of the above responses. Get a life and quit complaining about things that really do not matter. "

M wrote on December 18, 2006 2:24 pm:
" Some of these laws are ridiculous. Some are not! I agree with the one of having your pets in your lap while driving. You may want to risk your life, but please do not risk mine or my family's. "

Barb wrote on December 18, 2006 2:32 pm:
" I can't believe no one mentioned the outrageous fees we pay to license our cars! Both my vehicles are over 10 years old but every year I have to pay over $200 to license them. In SD it's $30/year to license your car. At the time you buy it, it's $300 but every year there after it's $30. Of course, they also allow casino's in their state, which would be fine by me too. "

bg wrote on December 18, 2006 2:52 pm:
" How about a law that would require any business receiving a state contract to also have a labor contract that extends past the conclusion of the state contract. "

SB wrote on December 18, 2006 3:03 pm:
" to H - "Safe House" does not mean "Safe Haven"!! Nebraska does not have a safe haven law. This idea for a law is the only one that is intelligent and worthwhile. "

Tina wrote on December 18, 2006 3:21 pm:
" I think we need to educate ourselves a little more about taxes around here. Asking employers to have W-2 forms to employees by December 31st each year is impossible, and ridiculous to request. Is the accounting person supposed to stay until you are off of work on the 31st of December and then figure out what you've earned that year and then print it out for you as you head out the door for the day? That's a lot of work to be done in a few hours, what about the person who gets off work at midnight on Dec 31st? Does their employer receive a fine for non-compliance or do they have to close the business early to do W-2s? Please remember to think before you speak, or in this case, think before you blog. "

Sylvia wrote on December 18, 2006 3:43 pm:
" We don't need more laws or more things to budget, we need to get rid of the STINKER laws. Let me buy booze on Sunday at 10AM, as a Non-Christian, I should be allowed to purchase beer while everyone else is in church, or Irish cream at 8AM so I can bake my grandmother a cake. I make my alloted 200 free gallons of beer/wine, now let me distill my own liquor. Let me buy allergy medicine without ID, (if you want a real solution make everyone who buys drano have to show ID instead). Repeal Lincoln's inane teenage dance laws. Repeal laws that criminalize topless women, but not topless men. REPEAL REPEAL REPEAL! The only law I would add is for the state to fully disclose how much we give to corporations every year due to LB 775. "

dish wrote on December 18, 2006 3:48 pm:
" requiring a 911 caller to stick around the scene is rediculous. All this would do is cause a delay in response time. A person would think... hmmm ill be late for my appointment if I call so ill let the next person who passes by call. It would soon turn into a wrong place wrong time kind of deal. If anything just require the callers name and contact them later. "

Chef wrote on December 18, 2006 4:00 pm:
" Way to go. It is a pretty impressive list of IDEAS! It is amazing that some of the more common sense ones are not already in place in Nebraska. PLease do a follow up on the Sixty Suggetions after the Legislative Session ! "

SS wrote on December 18, 2006 5:46 pm:
" No driving until you're 18? I am a junior at UNL, and I wouldn't have been able to drive until I was a sophomore in college! I would have been unable to have a job, which means I would not have been able to pay for school. Maybe if Lincoln had more reliable public transport... "

Gene wrote on December 18, 2006 6:45 pm:
" A law offering smaller glasses of beer? Most of us consuming a 14 oz container of beer don't consider that "binge drinking." Instead of banning cell phones in public, I think we should ban some of the people that submitted these laws from being in public with the rest of us. "

S wrote on December 18, 2006 9:21 pm:
" Thank you 'A' for finally showing people that it would cost taxpayers more money to execute a person than keep them alive. If we're going to talk about getting frivolous laws, lets get a law that castrates closed minded people. "

Receipts for child support? wrote on December 18, 2006 11:20 pm:
" You cannot possibly be serious about that? You really think that the custodial parent should be providing receipts for expenses related to providing for the child? That is absolutely NUTS!!! Yes, nuts! First of all, when you have a child that child is your first priority in everything you do. Financially and otherwise you must make sacrifices to provide for their daily needs. I can tell you that as a child support receiving mother, I am not by any stretch of the imagination getting rich or living high on the hog. I am working hard to make ends meet and keep my child in clothing, a roof over her head, fed, and provided all the basic things a child should have. Sure she is allowed entertainment, and has friends over and all of the normal things that kids do, but we do not have a mansion or drive limos to school. We drive a 12 year old car without a payment and spend carefully, while the father who pays child support has a brand new home, a brand new vehicle, and all the online adult activity he can stand. So guess what, you who complain about child support.. suck it up, take care of your children and the next time you want to complain because you think that your ex is getting rich off of child support, think again and perhaps cut back where you can, as I am certain the single mom of your children has done. "

sam wrote on December 19, 2006 9:15 am:
" I agree that immigrants should learn to speak the language, if we are in another country that the primary language is not english we are expected to speak their language, there are not signs in all languages, it should be done out respect for the country you are in. "

SEth wrote on December 19, 2006 10:11 am:
" The only reason executing people costs more is because of all the appeals. if they could find away to limit them to 1 or 2 appeals, killing them would be a lot cheaper. "

kirk patrick wrote on December 19, 2006 10:14 am:
" I was in a home improvment store last weekend and I had a question about a product. The only employee I could find could barely speak english. After 10 minutes of trying to figure out what he was saying, I left and went to a different store and made my purchase. You may all think the guy was speaking spanish, but he wasn't. I just don't think I need to learn french, spanish, german, chinese or any other language to buy a bag of nails. "

Soylent Green wrote on December 19, 2006 10:18 am:
" How is it that cyclists riding side-by-side on paved, unshouldered roads is dangerous to anyone? I assume that the reason behind this thinking is that the driver of the vehicle who passes them illegally because they are late to some soccer practice or hair appointment is worried that they might lose control and wreck their precious SUV. Please remember that it is legal to operate a bicycle on most of the State's roads but it is illegal to blow past a group of cyclists in a no passing zone just because they are going slower than you are... "

VS wrote on December 19, 2006 10:33 am:
" The fingerprinting the discarded beer bottles on the city streets would be absolutely ridiculous. How many people do you think have touched a beer bottle from manufacturer to stock clerks and so on. Besides do you even know what it entails to have to process a finger print at the Lincoln Police Dept?? Or how much time and money it would take to do this? I think we need to worry about more serious crimes than this. "

Cyclists wrote on December 19, 2006 11:54 am:
" Having them ride on the highways with no shoulder is dangerous for everyone. I am willing to be the average speed for the cyclists is 15mph. Now, class, can anyone tell me how long it takes a vehicle going 60mph to stop or slow down to 15mph? Long enough for the bike rider to be hit and ran over. I have no problem with cyclists if they want to ride, but there is no reason for bike riders to try take up an entire lane of a highway. Also, as far as city riding goes, if the cyclists wouldn't pass people when they are stopped at a light just to get back in front of the crowd, we wouldn't have to try to pass them 3 times on the trip across town. That's illegal for the cyclists to do that. "

KW wrote on December 19, 2006 12:15 pm:
" I don't know how many times I have called about something and have gotten a foreigner and I can't understand. The other day I called my credit card company fearing something might have been charged to my account, and over and over I kept saying to the person, "I can't understand you". To this day somebody could be charging on my account because I never could understand what she was saying. It should be a law that everybody legally in the U.S learn ENGLISH. "

fathead Neuman wrote on December 19, 2006 12:47 pm:
" I love the story comments. Nothing like two extremes duking it out over moral supremacy. I personally agree with the "Advertise the 'before-rebate' price" and "Add tax advantage to cars sold privately" suggestions. "

NR wrote on December 19, 2006 2:37 pm:
" Many companies now are outsourcing overseas for customer service. Also, it just drives me crazy that people think everyone in the U.S. should speak English. Has anyone tried to learn a new language? It's not something that comes to you overnight. Many people are faced with not only learning a new language, but also learning unfamiliar customs and acclimating to a new lifestyle. Speaking a native language can make a person more comfortable. Imagine if you went somewhere and were looked down on for speaking English. Times are changing and knowing a language OTHER than English may become necessary. "

fellow lincolnite wrote on December 19, 2006 3:12 pm:
" Wow, it seems we are a bitter town! You have to remember that there are reasons that the laws we have are laws to begin with. Many times silly laws are in place because some silly person did something to prevoke that law being made in the first place. Kinda like funny little warnings about hot coffee in coffee cups. DUH!! Lets all just start using the common sense that is in those brains somewhere and suck it up when the lack of it causes problems! "

JM wrote on December 19, 2006 4:51 pm:
" There already is a law on the books for 'talking on your cell phone' or having a pet on your lap' while driving your car. It's called Negligent Driving and tickets are written for these violations when officers see them affecting a person's driving abilities. It can also be applied to people reading, applying makeup in the mirror, talking to their friends in the car, or looking for CDs while driving. If these things inhibit the driver's ability, distract them, and/or make them a danger to themselves or other citizens then they can be cited for Negligent Driving. When it comes to fingerprinting beer bottles it would never be worth the time. It would take hundreds of man hours and commonly not result in an arrest. Fingerprinting doesn't always result in a good print, there can be too many other prints involved on a bottle to narrow the suspects, and unless the person was previously lodged in jail their print wouldn't be in the fingerprint system anyways. It would not be a cost effective solution to the problem. We would all love to see people that park in fire zones and handicap stalls get tickets, but the logistics of regular citizens reporting the crime and officers writing a ticket would not work. All it would take is one person to be upset with someone and falsely report them. The best options are to hire more public service officers or for citizen's to call the violation in. Officers can write a ticket if a complaint is made. The car may be gone by the time officers arrive, but that's no different than any other traffic ticket. We are already stretched thin for officers in Lincoln. "

No Right On Red..... wrote on December 19, 2006 5:11 pm:
" If we allowed right turns on red anywhere anytime do you think people are actually going to look for pedistrians or anyone or anything else for that matter?????? Drivers here are bad enough. This would just give the a license to be even worse! "

right on red wrote on December 20, 2006 6:38 am:
" There are several intersections in the city where you can't see if a car is coming towards the intersection. 27th and old cheney is a good example. If you are trying to turn north on 27th off of west bound old cheney, you can't see if a car is coming because a hill leads up to the intersection. That's why you can't go left there. But, it's not like people adhere to that sign anyway. "

Limit Appeals wrote on December 20, 2006 9:53 am:
" I think we should limit appeals. If you want to make the judicial system more affective why not make a law that limits how many times they can appeal a case. Really how many times do you need to be announced Guilty? "

Brian wrote on December 20, 2006 10:31 am:
" Outlaw talking on cell phones while driving. I can't stand it when I see cops driving around talking on cell phones. Someone is going to get ran over one of these days. Promote bicycle useage as much as possible! Save the ozone, reduce dependance on foreign oil, save $ and get in shape. ...just look out for that mini van with soccer mom, 4 screamin kids and a cell phone attached to her head driving like a drunk behind you. "

Holy Crap wrote on December 20, 2006 10:35 am:
" As expected, some of these suggestions were thought-provoking - and some were just ridiculous. Garage sale sign fines? Gosh, if my life were that worry-free... "

Bottles wrote on December 20, 2006 11:03 am:
" If a citizen complained of littering and then insisted that the litter be collected and fingerprinted and the officer did not do as instructed by the citizen he/she could be written up and disciplined. "

Felma wrote on December 20, 2006 11:10 am:
" I agree. Receits for child support based expenditures should be required. The non-custodial parent is held accountable for providing the monthly welfare. The custodial parent should be held accountable also, and be able to prove that the money is being spent on the child and the child only. There are too many cases documented where mom is getting her hair cut or going to the liquor store or entertaining a potential new boyfriend/revenue source and not spending the money on the child it is intended for. "

crazy wrote on December 20, 2006 2:44 pm:
" Child support isn't just made to give Sally a new dress. It is to help pay for stuff that benefits the child. House payment, health insurance, car payments, groceries. all of that stuff directly effects the child. You try to make all the money be spent on the kid, think where that could leave you. "

SB wrote on December 21, 2006 11:30 am:
" I'd like to see people learn to speak and write properly. This comment is not in reference to the other comments posted here about those who don't speak English as their first language. I'm referring to those who speak English as a first language and still cannot seem to speak or write properly. Just read many of the comments here. There are all sorts of misspellings, words left out or misused, poor syntax, and capital letters erroneously used where none are appropriate. It's difficult to take a person seriously who can't seem to put together a coherent sentence, and it makes the writer appear to be ignorant and uneducated. And it doesn't matter that this is an informal posting—bad writing is bad writing. "

NO SMOKING IN CARS WITH KIDS wrote on December 23, 2006 9:21 am:
" i think that the law about not smoking in cars with the kids is the best one there, it is said that the smoke has the same stuff in it as rat poison and if you feed your kid rat poison you would go to jail for child abuse why should you not go for smoking in closed rooms or cars with them since you are making them breath rat poison!!!!! "

AF wrote on December 23, 2006 9:53 am:
" Thank you, SB!! Whenever I have a couple of extra minutes, I enjoy sitting down to read the comical postings in the LJS. I was discussing with a co-worker the other day how truly amazed I am with the number of spelling and grammar errors from 'writers' who then go on to say they are college students! I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who has noticed this! No, this site is not intended for an essay competition, but when individuals are trying to get a serious point across they should make some attempt at sounding credible. "

Mark wrote on December 25, 2006 10:48 pm:
" If the cost of a death penalty case is predominantly in the trial and appeals phases, we need to reduce the number of appeals and simplify the trial process so every defendant can't file motions on cruel and unusual punishment. That issue has been heard and decided by the Supreme Court. Get over it and get to the execution phase. "

Kevin wrote on December 28, 2006 10:01 am:
" I think if you can start voting at 18 that is when you should be able to get a drivers license and purchase alcohol. If this is too young it should be at age 19 when most people are out of High School and can't use the excuse that they are kids in school. If the minimum wage gets increaded then I am in trouble because my employer won't give me a raise at my hourly rate which is $14 per hour. If the minimum wage does go up lets say a buck an hour do you think my employer would raise my hourly rate a buck? I would bet my yearly salary they wouldn't. How is that fair. There ought be a law about that! Can we stop calling people who live in Lincoln "Lincolnites"? How about "Lincoln Nation"? Yep they are both rediculous. "

becky wrote on December 30, 2006 8:57 am:
" Forgot one. Make a law that requires a vote of the taxpayers before legislature can raise the tax on anything. Some other states have such a law. This would stop the frivilous spending with the taxpayer having to cough up more in taxes. "

Jess wrote on December 30, 2006 1:31 pm:
" As an parent and a former CASA, I think we need stiffer laws against child abuse. Nothing hurts more than when i read about a parent who MURDERED their child/infant and then gets charged with only manslaughter. Let's call it what it is. Taking the innocence and the life of a child is the most heinous crime and it should be punished as such. "

Vicky wrote on December 31, 2006 8:43 am:
" Mandatory IUDs for mothers who give birth to Alcohol Fetal Syndrome babies or meth moms, and/or if you've been convicted of child neglect, endangerment, or death of a child. "